Page 67 - AC-2-4
P. 67

Arts & Communication                                                Culture as a drive for art and architecture




            A                             B                                      C
















            Figure 3. Local sanctuaries in Ugarit. (A) Sanctuary of Rhytons, city center. (B) The New Sanctuary, old royal zone. (C) Royal Sanctuary, new royal zone.
            Images produced by the author using AutoCAD software and based on the author’s fieldwork in 2013

            character as landmarks visible from a distance.  It is   A
                                                     16
            believed that they served as significant beacons for sailors
            arriving at the port of Mahadou (Minet el-Beida), located
            < 1 km west of Ugarit.  On the other hand, the discovered
                             15
            sanctuaries had a more local character; they accommodated
            everyday religious and, probably, social activities for civic
            or royal communities. Moving forward, this article  will
            analyze  examples  of  main  temples  and  local  sanctuaries
            in Ugarit to articulate the influence of political, cultural,
            religious, and social dimensions on the architectural and
            urban aspects of these buildings.

            2.1. The symbolic temples on the acropolis
            The  two  main  temples  excavated  in  the  city  are  located
            in the Acropolis area (Figure  4). Based on Callot and
            Monchambert’s systematic surveys of the two temples,
            between 1988 and 1990, and again in 2005, along with the
            study of some discovered texts – especially the poems and
            myths found in the House of Great Priest – it has been
            highlighted that the Acropolis area, with its two temples, is   B
            important for understanding this ancient civilization and
            the city’s urban morphology throughout its lifetime. 15

            2.1.1. The main temple of Baal
                                                               Figure 4. The morphological settings of the City of Ugarit. (A) Ugarit’s
            The two temples show striking similarities in architectural   topography showing the location of the Acropolis and its morphological
            design, arrangement, form, and building techniques, which   settings. (B) The general section of Ugarit showing the city’s topography
            have informed the interpretation of the temples’ ruins   and the morphological settings of the Acropolis area. Drawings prepared
                                                               by the author using AutoCAD software based on topographic information
            where excavation or prolonged exposure had destroyed   and the author’s filed analysis and observation in 2013.
            the evidence; therefore, in this article, the Temple of Baal is
            analyzed as a case study of the main temples in the city. The   enclosure  had  a  monumental  gate  opening to  the  west,
            temple occupies the highest point where all routes end; its   facing the Royal Palace. A direct street probably connected
            ruins occupy a fortified island yet fully integrated with the   the temple with the palace, with 70% of this street excavated
            urban context, as can be seen in the layout of stairs, ramps,   so far (Figure 5). This connection is not surprising, bearing
            and streets (Figure 2). Following the original excavation   in mind the palace-temple economy that existed in Ugarit
            (1929–1932) by Schaeffer, 11,13  a comprehensive systematic   during  the  Late  Bronze  Age.  The  temple  and  the  palace
            analysis was conducted by Callot and Monchambert   had equally empowered the development of various
            in 1988.  Excavation works revealed that the temple’s   aspects of life in the city. The temple’s important role in the
                   15

            Volume 2 Issue 4 (2024)                         4                                doi: 10.36922/ac.3132
   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72