Page 8 - AJWEP-v22i3
P. 8

Iroegbu, et al.

                scientific,  industrial,  and  regulatory  discourse.  For   Furthermore,   this   work   challenges   present
                example,  the  interchangeable  use  of  terms,  such  as   perceptions and misconceptions  surrounding plastic
                “plastics,”  “polymers,”  and  “macromolecules”  has   pollution, urging researchers and policymakers  to
                contributed to ambiguity in understanding the scope of   adopt  contextually  appropriate  definitions  that  reflect
                plastic pollution, its classification, and the implications   the material  properties,  environmental  impacts,  and
                for policy formulation.  This is critical because we live   regulatory requirements. By refining the language used
                                    4-8
                in a language-driven world where the usage of words   in plastic pollution discourse, this study seeks to promote
                and their  symbolic  representations  shapes thoughts,   a  more  accurate,  informed,  and  unified  approach  to
                influences  interpretations,  and  ultimately  defines   addressing one of the most pressing environmental
                approaches to conventional issues.  Therefore,  in   issues of our time.
                                                 1,9
                scientific discourse, precise definitions play a crucial role
                in shaping policies, guiding societal  perceptions, and   2. Methodology
                determining responses to environmental challenges.  It
                                                              1
                is unarguable that establishing clear, accurate, and well-  To systematically assess the inconsistencies in polymer-
                founded definitions that authentically reflect the subject   related  terminology and propose a standardization
                matter  is  essential  for  effective  communication  and   framework, this study employed a structured literature
                informed decision-making.                           review.  The methodology was designed to ensure a
                  The  advent  of synthetic  polymer  production  has   rigorous, transparent, and reproducible analysis of the
                ushered in a pervasive environmental challenge in the   definitions and classifications of plastics, polymers, and
                form of plastic pollution. 2,3,10-12  This issue has garnered   macromolecules within scientific, industrial, and policy
                increasing attention over the decades, as evidenced by   contexts.
                the vast literature that varies in scope, scientific rigor,   A comprehensive review of peer-reviewed literature
                and tone. 2,13-20  For example, a search in Google Scholar   was conducted by searching databases, such as
                using the term “plastic pollution” yields an enormous   Scopus, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect, focusing
                collection  of  literature  on  this  subject.  Given  this   on publications  from 2020 to 2025 to capture  recent
                significant  volume  of  reports,  vital  questions  emerge.   advancements and policy discussions. Selection criteria
                For  instance,  “Why  has  the  scientific  discourse  on   prioritized studies that directly addressed terminological
                plastic  pollution  persisted  over  the  years?”  “Are  we   inconsistencies,  environmental  implications  of
                addressing  polymer  or  plastic  pollution?”  “Are  there   misclassification, and the role of standardized definitions
                comprehensive  solutions  to  address  this  challenge?”   in regulatory frameworks. Key data points were extracted
                This  paper  critically  examines  the  persistent  issue  of   to identify patterns of inconsistencies,  assess  their
                terminological  inconsistencies in plastic pollution   impact on scientific discourse and policy, and evaluate
                discourse. By systematically  reviewing the literature   existing  classification  models.  The  findings  informed
                from  2020  to  2025,  we  assess  the  extent  to  which   the development  of a standardization  framework
                terminology  variations  influence  scientific  research   aligned with the IUPAC principles, ensuring scientific
                and policy frameworks. Unlike previous reviews      accuracy and practical applicability. A summary of the
                that primarily  discuss plastic pollution from an   methodological approach is presented in Table 1.
                environmental or technological perspective, this study
                highlights the definitional challenges that hinder effective   3. Terminology ambiguity of plastic
                communication and problem-solving in the field.
                  To address this challenge, we propose a standardization   Macromolecules  are  fundamental  to life  and
                framework  aligned  with  the  International  Union of   technology.  From  DNA  and  proteins  to  advanced
                Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) principles. This   synthetic materials, they underpin biological structures
                framework provides clear distinctions between plastics,   and industrial  innovations  alike. 5,21-28  The  evolution
                polymers, and macromolecules, thereby ensuring greater   of polymer  science  has enabled  the development  of
                precision in academic research, industrial applications,   countless materials with tailored properties, propelling
                and policy-making. The study advocates the integration   progress across multiple  domains. 5,29  Despite their
                of standardized terminology into the scientific literature,   centrality,  the  terms  “macromolecule”  and  “polymer”
                environmental  policies,  and  industrial  regulations   are  frequently  used interchangeably  in  the  literature,
                to enhance  clarity, improve data harmonization,  and   often  without  clarification,  leading  to  scientific
                support evidence-based decision-making.             ambiguity.  While  common,  this  conflation  deviates



                Volume 22 Issue 3 (2025)                        2                            doi: 10.36922/AJWEP025200158
   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13