Page 22 - AN-3-3
P. 22

Advanced Neurology                                           Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease rodent models



               doi: 10.1002/mds.23637                             doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.04.034
            58.  Dehay B, Bourdenx M, Gorry P, et al. Targeting α-synuclein for   69.  Perez FA, Palmiter RD. Parkin-deficient mice are not
               treatment of Parkinson’s disease: Mechanistic and therapeutic   a robust model of parkinsonism.  Proc Natl Acad Sci.
               considerations. Lancet Neurol. 2015;14(8):855-866.  2005;102(6):2174-2179.
               doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(15)00006-X                 doi: 10.1073/pnas.0409598102
            59.  Chesselet MF, Fleming S, Mortazavi F, Meurers B.   70.  Paul S, Pickrell AM. Hidden phenotypes of PINK1/
               Strengths and limitations of genetic mouse models   Parkin knockout mice.  Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj.
               of Parkinson’s disease.  Parkinsonism Relat Disord.   2021;1865(6):129871.
               2008;14 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S84-S87.
                                                                  doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2021.129871
               doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2008.04.004
                                                               71.  Kitada  T,  Tong  Y,  Gautier  CA,  Shen  J.  Absence  of  nigral
            60.  Blesa J, Przedborski S. Parkinson’s disease: Animal models   degeneration in aged parkin/DJ‐1/PINK1 triple knockout
               and dopaminergic cell vulnerability.  Front Neuroanat.   mice. J Neurochem. 2009;111(3):696-702.
               2014;8:155.
                                                                  doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2009.06350.x
               doi: 10.3389/fnana.2014.00155
                                                               72.  Noda S, Sato S, Fukuda T, et al. Loss of Parkin contributes to
            61.  Lin X, Parisiadou L, Sgobio C, et al. Conditional expression   mitochondrial turnover and dopaminergic neuronal loss in
               of  Parkinson’s  disease-related  mutant  α-synuclein  in   aged mice. Neurobiol Dis. 2020;136:104717.
               the midbrain dopaminergic neurons causes progressive
               neurodegeneration and degradation of transcription factor      doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2019.104717
               nuclear receptor related 1. J Neurosci. 2012;32(27):9248-9264.  73.  Wallings R, Manzoni C, Bandopadhyay R. Cellular processes
               doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1731-12.2012                associated with LRRK2 function and dysfunction. FEBS J.
                                                                  2015;282(15):2806-2826.
            62.  Kitada T, Asakawa S, Hattori N, et al. Mutations in the parkin
               gene cause autosomal recessive juvenile parkinsonism.      doi: 10.1111/febs.13305
               Nature. 1998;392(6676):605-608.                 74.  Zimprich A, Biskup S, Leitner P, et al. Mutations in LRRK2
               doi: 10.1038/33416                                 cause autosomal-dominant parkinsonism with pleomorphic
                                                                  pathology. Neuron. 2004;44(4):601-607.
            63.  Zhang Y, Gao J, Chung KK, Huang H, Dawson VL,
               Dawson TM. Parkin functions as an E2-dependent      doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.11.005
               ubiquitin- protein ligase and promotes the degradation of   75.  Volta M, Melrose H. LRRK2 mouse models: Dissecting the
               the synaptic vesicle-associated protein, CDCrel-1. Proc Natl   behavior, striatal neurochemistry and neurophysiology of
               Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97(24):13354-13359.           PD pathogenesis. Biochem Soc Trans. 2017;45(1):113-122.
               doi: 10.1073/pnas.240347797                        doi: 10.1042/BST20160238
            64.  Dawson TM, Dawson VL. The role of parkin in   76.  Lee Y, Dawson VL, Dawson TM. Animal models of
               familial and sporadic Parkinson’s disease.  Mov Disord.   Parkinson’s disease: Vertebrate genetics.  Cold Spring Harb
               2010;25 Suppl 1(1):S32-S39.                        Perspect Med. 2012;2(10):a009324.
               doi: 10.1002/mds.22798                             doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a009324
            65.  Kin K, Yasuhara T, Kameda M, Date I. Animal models for   77.  Dovonou A, Bolduc C, Soto Linan V, Gora C, Peralta Iii MR,
               Parkinson’s disease research: Trends in the 2000s. Int J Mol   Lévesque M. Animal models of Parkinson’s disease: Bridging
               Sci. 2019;20(21):5402.                             the gap between disease hallmarks and research questions.
               doi: 10.3390/ijms20215402                          Transl Neurodegener. 2023;12(1):36.
            66.  Narendra DP, Jin SM, Tanaka A, et al. PINK1 is selectively      doi: 10.1186/s40035-023-00368-8
               stabilized on impaired mitochondria to activate Parkin.   78.  Ramonet D, Daher JPL, Lin BM,  et al. Dopaminergic
               PLoS Biol. 2010;8(1):e1000298.                     neuronal loss, reduced neurite complexity and autophagic
               doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000298                  abnormalities in transgenic mice expressing G2019S mutant
                                                                  LRRK2. PLoS One. 2011;6(4):e18568.
            67.  Schneider SA, Alcalay RN. Neuropathology of genetic
               synucleinopathies with parkinsonism: Review of the      doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018568
               literature. Mov Disord. 2017;32(11):1504-1523.  79.  Chasseigneaux S, Allinquant B. Functions of Aβ, sAPPα
               doi: 10.1002/mds.27193                             and sAPPβ : Similarities  and differences.  J  Neurochem.
                                                                  2012;120(s1):99-108.
            68.  Dawson TM, Ko HS, Dawson VL. Genetic animal models of
               Parkinson’s disease. Neuron. 2010;66(5):646-661.     doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2011.07584.x


            Volume 3 Issue 3 (2024)                         16                               doi: 10.36922/an.2903
   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27