Page 35 - BH-3-3
P. 35

Brain & Heart                                               Modern imaging and management of bicuspid valves



               doi: 10.1111/cpf.12166                             disease: A report of the American College of Cardiology/
                                                                  American Heart  Association Task  Force  on Practice
            39.  Stout KK, Daniels CJ, Aboulhosn JA, et al. 2018 AHA/ACC   Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63(22):e57-185.
               guideline for the management of adults with congenital heart
               disease: A report of the American College of Cardiology/     doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.02.536
               American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice   48.  Warnes CA, Williams RG, Bashore TM,  et  al.
               Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;73(12):e81-e192.  ACC/AHA 2008 guidelines for the management of adults
               doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.08.1029                   with congenital heart disease: A  report of the American
                                                                  College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task
            40.  Biaggi P, Matthews F, Braun J, Rousson V, Kaufmann PA,   Force on Practice Guidelines (writing committee to develop
               Jenni R. Gender, age, and body surface area are the major   guidelines on the management of adults with congenital
               determinants of ascending aorta dimensions in subjects with   heart disease). Circulation. 2008;118(23):e714-833.
               apparently normal echocardiograms. J Am Soc Echocardiogr.
               2009;22(6):720-725.                                doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.190690
               doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2009.03.012                 49.  Tanaka R, Yoshioka K, Niinuma H, Ohsawa S,
                                                                  Okabayashi H, Ehara S. Diagnostic value of cardiac CT in
            41.  Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V, et al. Recommendations   the evaluation of bicuspid aortic stenosis: Comparison With
               for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography   echocardiography and operative findings. Am J Roentgenol.
               in  adults:  An update  from the American  Society  of   2010;195(4):895-899.
               Echocardiography  and  the  European  Association
               of Cardiovascular Imaging.  J  Am Soc Echocardiogr.      doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.3164
               2015;28(1):1-39.e14.                            50.  Gleeson TG, Mwangi I, Horgan SJ, Cradock A, Fitzpatrick P,
               doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2014.10.003                    Murray JG. Steady‐state free‐precession (SSFP) cine MRI in
                                                                  distinguishing normal and bicuspid aortic valves.  J  Magn
            42.  Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, et al. 2017 AHA/ACC   Reson Imaging. 2008;28(4):873-878.
               focused update of the 2014  AHA/ACC guideline for the
               management of patients with valvular heart disease: A report      doi: 10.1002/jmri.21547
               of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart   51.  Evangelista Masip A, Galian-Gay L, Guala A,  et  al.
               Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.   Unraveling bicuspid aortic valve enigmas by multimodality
               Circulation. 2017;135(25):e1159-e1195.             imaging: Clinical implications. J Clin Med. 2022;11(2):456.
               doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000503                  doi: 10.3390/jcm11020456
            43.  Pellikka PA, Sarano ME, Nishimura RA, et al. Outcome of   52.  Naito S, Petersen J, Reichenspurner H, Girdauskas E. The
               622 adults with asymptomatic, hemodynamically significant   impact of coronary anomalies on the outcome in aortic
               aortic  stenosis  during  prolonged  follow-up.  Circulation.   valve surgery: Comparison of bicuspid aortic valve versus
               2005;111(24):3290-3295.                            tricuspid aortic valve morphotype.  Interact Cardiovasc
               doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.495903             Thorac Surg. 2018;26(4):617-622.
            44.  Zoghbi WA, Adams D, Bonow RO, et al. Recommendations for      doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivx396
               noninvasive evaluation of native valvular regurgitation: A report   53.  Machowiec P, Przybylski P, Czekajska-Chehab E, Drop A.
               from the American Society of echocardiography developed in   Patients with a Bicuspid Aortic Valve (BAV) diagnosed
               collaboration with the society for cardiovascular magnetic   with ECG-gated cardiac multislice computed tomography-
               resonance. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2017;30(4):303-371.  analysis of the reasons for referral, classification of
                                                                  morphological phenotypes, co-occurring cardiovascular
               doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2017.01.007
                                                                  abnormalities, and coronary artery stenosis.  J  Clin Med.
            45.  Tsampasian V, Victor K, Bhattacharyya S, Oxborough D,   2024;13(13):3790.
               Ring L. Echocardiographic assessment of aortic regurgitation:
               A narrative review. Echo Res Pract. 2024;11(1):1.     doi: 10.3390/jcm13133790
                                                               54.  DiLorenzo MP, Grosse-Wortmann L. Myocardial fibrosis
               doi: 10.1186/s44156-023-00036-7
                                                                  in congenital heart disease and the role of MRI.  Radiol
            46.  Hagendorff  A,  Evangelista  A,  Fehske  W,  Schäfers  HJ.   Cardiothorac Imaging. 2023;5(3):e220255.
               Improvement in the assessment of aortic valve and aortic
               aneurysm repair by 3-dimensional echocardiography. JACC      doi: 10.1148/ryct.220255
               Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019;12(11):2225-2244.      55.  Rodríguez-Palomares JF, Dux-Santoy L, Guala A,  et al.
                                                                  Aortic flow patterns and wall shear stress maps by 4D-flow
               doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.06.032
                                                                  cardiovascular magnetic resonance in the assessment of
            47.  Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC   aortic dilatation in bicuspid aortic valve disease. J Cardiovasc
               guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart   Magn Reson. 2018;20(1):28.


            Volume 3 Issue 3 (2025)                         16                           doi: 10.36922/BH025050008
   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40