Page 45 - BH-3-3
P. 45

Brain & Heart                                                                     A review on MINOCA



            beta-blockers can exacerbate the severity of spasm, they   Funding
            may not be recommended in patients with MINOCA and
            myocardial  bridging  whose  acetylcholine  test  indicates   None.
            epicardial or microvascular spasm. Instead, calcium channel   Conflict of interest
            blockers should be used for vasodilation.  Ivabradine can
                                             52
            be used as a second-line drug, especially for patients who   The authors declare no conflict of interest.
            cannot take beta-blockers or calcium channel blockers.
                                                               Author contributions
              Nonetheless, percutaneous coronary intervention
            can be carried out in individuals with MINOCA due   Conceptualization: Vicky Kumar
                                                               Visualization: Vicky Kumar, Haris Muhammad
            to myocardial bridging-related atherosclerotic plaque   Writing – original draft: Vicky Kumar, Haris Muhammad
            rupture.  Percutaneous coronary intervention in the   Writing– review & editing:  Ilsa Fatima, Joan Fallouh,
                  53
            setting of myocardial bridging, however, may be difficult   Rola Ali, Amer Hammad, Haris Usman, Oghenetejir
            to perform and pose a greater short- and long-term risk.  Gbegbaje

            9. Conclusion                                      Ethics approval and consent to participate
            MINOCA affects up to 15% of patients with a presentation   Not applicable.
            of AMI, occurring in a younger population who are
            less likely to have typical cardiovascular risk factors   Consent for publication
            and with a large female predominance. The condition
            is  defined  by  acute  myocardial injury with  an  absence   Not applicable.
            of significant coronary artery stenosis and represents a   Availability of data
            diagnostic challenge, as the condition encompasses both
            type  1  and type  2 MI  and  can  appear  clinically  similar   Not applicable.
            to other conditions that cause non-ischemic myocardial   References
            injury, such as takotsubo cardiomyopathy or myocarditis.
            The diagnosis of MINOCA requires diagnosis of AMI   1.   Rossler C, Morbidoni J, Santillán ME,  et al. Myocardial
            according to universal MI criteria, with non-obstructive   infarction  without  coronary  arteries  lesions.  Insights
            coronary disease as demonstrated by coronary angiography   from the CONAREC XVII registry.  Medicina (B Aires).
            and no clinically overt specific cause for the patient’s   2021;81(3):375-381.
            acute presentation other than MI. The pathophysiological   2.   Savran SV, Bryson AL, Welch TG, Zaret BL, McGowan RL,
            mechanisms contributing to MINOCA are diverse, ranging   Flamm MD Jr. Clinical correlates of coronary
            from plaque disruption and SCAD to non-cardiac causes   cineangiography in young males with myocardial infarction.
            such as pulmonary embolism, sepsis, and shock. This   Am Heart J. 1976;91(5):551-555.
            heterogeneity necessitates a cause-specific diagnostic plan      doi: 10.1016/S0002-8703(76)80138-X
            with coronary angiography to exclude obstructive CAD in   3.   Pasupathy S, Air T, Dreyer RP, Tavella R, Beltrame JF.
            addition to transesophageal echocardiogram and imaging   Systematic review of patients presenting with suspected
            techniques such as CMR and OCT to identify underlying   myocardial infarction and nonobstructive coronary arteries.
            causes such as coronary vasospasm. The management     Circulation. 2015;131(10):861-870.
            is also cause-specific. Pharmacological therapy with      doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.011201
            beta-blockers, statins, ACE inhibitors/ARBs, and dual   4.   Bainey KR, Welsh RC, Alemayehu W, et al. Population-level
            antiplatelets has been shown to be beneficial, however, to   incidence and outcomes of myocardial infarction with non-
            different  extents  in each specific MINOCA population.   obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA): Insights from the
            Prognosis for MINOCA patients varies considerably     Alberta contemporary acute coronary syndrome patients
            based on the underlying etiology and degree of myocardial   invasive treatment strategies (COAPT) study. Int J Cardiol.
            injury. While recent studies suggest that MINOCA      2018;264:12-17.
            generally carries a better long-term prognosis compared      doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.04.004
            to obstructive CAD, 37,38,40  there is a notable incidence of
            adverse outcomes such as MI recurrence.            5.   Kilic S, Aydın G, Çoner A,  et al. Prevalence and clinical
                                                                  profile of patients with myocardial infarction with non-
            Acknowledgments                                       obstructive coronary arteries in turkey (MINOCA-TR):
                                                                  A  national multi-centre, observational study.  Anatol J
            None.                                                 Cardiol. 2020;23(3):176-182.


            Volume 3 Issue 3 (2025)                         6                                doi: 10.36922/bh.5811
   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50