Page 78 - EJMO-9-1
P. 78

Eurasian Journal of Medicine and
            Oncology
                                                                                      Microbial profile of peri-implantitis


            and attractive substance, enriched with numerous   peri-implantitis in the future. However, further studies are
            immunological and inflammatory markers. In peri-   required, as there is a limited number of available studies.
            implant studies, not only has saliva been selected as a
            source of biomarkers, but peri-implant sulcular fluid has   15. The impact of failure on future success
            also been studied, showing promising results. A systematic   In general, regardless of the reasons behind dental implant
            review found that the matrix metalloproteinases and   failures, the bone remaining after implant failure is
            proinflammatory cytokines (e.g., interleukin-6, tumor   typically weak and reduced in almost all cases, therefore
            necrosis factor, and interleukin-1β) were elevated in peri-  jeopardizing the  likelihood  of success. However,  hope
            implantitis. 87                                    remains, as the survival rate of a second dental implant has
                                                               been estimated at approximately 67.1% in sites with two
            13. Antibiotics                                    previous failures, and this percentage rises up to 89% in
            The problem arises not only when bacteria win the race but   cases with a single prior failure. 95
            also when they maintain this victory for an extended period.   In addition, it has been found that the microbiota of
            This occurs when the bacteria overcome all modalities that   the remaining sockets has little effect on the survival rates
            threaten their success. One of the most significant threats   of second dental implants. 96,97  In contrast, another study
            to bacterial survival is the use of antibiotics; however,   indicated that the removal of granulation tissue and the
            this weapon is often weakened by the bacteria in certain   reduction of bacterial load in the socket could increase the
            instances. It has been shown that approximately 71.7% of   survival rate of the second dental implant. 98
            peri-implant pathogens are resistant to several antibiotics,
            including  amoxicillin, metronidazole, doxycycline, and   Further studies are needed to confirm the long-term
            clindamycin. 88                                    success of second dental implants and to address the
                                                               existing uncertainty. However, failure can sometimes serve
              Antibiotics have been incorporated into implant surfaces   as the first step toward success, as failed implants can be
            in an attempt to reduce or prevent peri-implant diseases. As   replaced with successful ones after a long-term interval.
            a result, a long list of different types of antibiotics has been
            tested in several studies, including tetracycline, rifampicin,   16. Conclusion
            vancomycin, amoxicillin, and gentamicin. 89-92
                                                               Despite the obvious similarities between the microflora
              For example, the inhibition of  E. coli, S. aureus, and   of implants and natural teeth, it remains controversial
            P. aeruginosa  can be achieved using gentamicin coating   and premature to determine whether peri-implantitis and
                             89
            for dental implants.  In the same context, prevention   periodontitis share exactly the same microbial profile.
            of osteomyelitis and enhancement of osseointegration
            as a secondary benefit of this antibiotic have also been   Acknowledgments
            observed. 89                                       The authors would like to thank College of Dentistry,

            14. Probiotics                                     University of Babylon for the help and cooperation.
            For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction,   Funding
            which can be applied to the microorganisms associated   None.
            with peri-implantitis, which act like a double-edged sword.
            Probiotics represent this reaction and the other edge of the   Conflict of interest
            sword, as they can be used as a treatment modality for peri-  The authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest
            implantitis.  It has  been  shown  that  Lactobacillus reuteri   from this study.
            exhibits  an  inhibitory  effect  on  S. aureus, P. intermedia,
            and P. gingivalis isolated from dental implants with peri-  Author contributions
            implantitis. 93
                                                               Conceptualization: Sura Dakhil Jassim
              Vacca et al.  found that probiotics can specifically target   Funding acquisition: Anfal Ihsan Jasim
                       94
            Streptococcus salivarius. This bacterium has the ability   Investigation: Sura Dakhil Jassim
            to inhibit  S. intermedius and disrupt cell-cell  signaling   Writing – original draft: Sura Dakhil Jassim
            (quorum sensing) in the biofilm formed on the surface of   Writing – review & editing: All authors
            titanium implants. 94
                                                               Ethics approval and consent to participate
              These previously mentioned benefits of probiotics
            could be applied to the treatment or even prevention of   Not applicable.


            Volume 9 Issue 1 (2025)                         70                              doi: 10.36922/ejmo.6770
   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83