Page 244 - IJB-10-1
P. 244

International Journal of Bioprinting                             NIR-secretome release for nerve regeneration




















































            Figure 4. Biological effect on neural cells of the release of secretome through near-infrared radiation after induced damage. (A) Schematic representation
            of the experimental setup. (B–D) Cell viability after the induction of damage with H O  and controlled release of culture medium, astrocyte-conditioned
                                                                  2
                                                                   2
            medium, and secretome of mesenchymal stem cells, respectively. (E–G) ROS production after the induction of damage with H O  and controlled release
                                                                                             2
                                                                                              2
            of culture medium, astrocyte-conditioned medium, and secretome of mesenchymal stem cells, respectively. Results are reported as % mean ± standard
            deviation. **p < 0.05 and ***p < 0.01, one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post-hoc test.
            with the cell viability data (Figure 3A and B). Our findings   secretome, but also the set of factors and vesicles released
            indicate that for evaluating the effectiveness and potential   by astrocytes (namely astrocyte-conditioned medium,
            of MSCs secretome in regenerating neural cells, bioprinted   ACM) displays a strong potential for the regeneration
            AGO microbeads at a GO concentration of 0.5 mg/mL   and proliferation of neural cells. For this purpose, we
            offer the most suitable configuration due to their elevated   bioprinted AGO microbeads having embedded ACM to
            release of FITC–Dextran and their ability to downregulate   compare their effectiveness with the secretome of MSCs
            ROS levels. As a result, we selected this GO concentration   and with standard culture medium as a negative control.
            for our subsequent experiments.                    Results are reported in Figure 4. After NIR irradiation, the
                                                               release of culture medium caused a mild increase in cell
            3.3. Biological effect of the secretome of         viability, similar to the previous finding (Figure 4B). The
            mesenchymal stem cells through near-infrared       release of ACM, importantly, caused a strong increase in
            controlled release on damaged neural cells         cell viability, which resulted to be 67% ± 11.1% with respect
            We then bioprinted AGO microbeads having GO at 0.5 mg/  to cells having induced neural damage with H O , which
                                                                                                     2
                                                                                                       2
            mL, in which we embedded the secretome of MSCs. It has   resulted to be 47% ± 9.3% (Figure 4C, p < 0.05, one-way
            widely been reported in the literature that not only the   ANOVA and Tukey’s post-hoc test). After controlled release

            Volume 10 Issue 1 (2024)                       236                          https://doi.org/10.36922/ijb.1045
   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249