Page 5 - IJB-3-1
P. 5

EDITORIAL


            Cell powered biobots and more perspectives for IJB



            Editor–in-Chief: Chee Kai CHUA

            Executive Director and Professor, Singapore Centre for 3D Printing, School of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering,
            College of Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore

            http://dx.doi.org/10.18063/IJB.2017.01.003.


            At the end of 2016, International Journal of Bioprint-  articles and 1 perspective. Liew and Zhang review in
            ing (IJB) is able to estimate its first mock impact fac-  vitro  pre-vascularization  strategies  for  tissue  engi-
                                                                              [1]
            tor.  Based  on  one issue published  in 2015, the 2016   neered constructs . Whitford and Hoying review re-
            mock impact factor for IJB is calculated to be 6, ex-  cent development in bioinks that support vasculariza-
                                                                  [2]
            cluding  self-citations!  This  result  is  surprising,  im-  tion .  Lee  et al.  review  recent  bioprinter  modifica-
                                                                                                           [3]
            pressive and encouraging. However, this is just a be-  tions  for  developing  new  cell  printing  systems .
            ginning  and  more  and  more  quality  articles  and  re-  Koch et al. present a parametric study of laser for la-
                                                                                  [4]
            views are needed in order to maintain it.          ser-assisted bioprinting . Murphy et al. report a sol-
               Tissue  transplants  and  in vitro  tissue  models  are   vent  evaporation  method  to  print  polymer/bioactive
            common applications of bioprinting. Recently, a new   glass  composite  scaffolds  with  stem  cells  incorpo-
                                                                   [5]
            application  of  bioprinting  is  emerging,  namely  cell   rated . Sing et al. investigate titanium/tantalum/ col-
            powered  biobots.  Cell  powered  biobots  are  biohy-  lagen-based  biphasic  implants  for  repairing  osteo-
                                                                             [6]
            bridmotile microsystems that are made from freeform   chondral defects . Liu et al. study the morphology of
            deposition of living cells and other materials. Cells are   polycaprolactone  scaffold  made  by  electrohydrody-
                                                                          [7]
            used to power the motility of the microsystem such as   namic  jetting .  Suntornnond  provides  a  perspective
                                                                                                     [8]
            walking,  swimming  or  flying,  depending  on  design   on the role of support materials in bioprinting .
            intent. Cells can also be genetically engineered for re-
            mote  control.  These  battery-free  dynamic  microsys-  References
            tems may have unimaginable applications in biomed-  1.  Liew  A  W  L  and  Zhang  Y,  2017,  In vitro  pre-vascu-
            ical science and engineering in future. We do welcome   larization  strategies  for t issue  engineered  constructs
            submissions  from  this  interesting  research  area  as   —  bioprinting  and  others.  International Journal of Bio-
            well.                                                  printing, vol.3(1): 3–17.
               We would also like to take this opportunity to invite   http://dx.doi.org/10.18063/IJB.2017.01.008
            any  person  or  organization  to  express  their  honest   2.  Whitford W and Hoying J B, 2017, Digital biomanufac-
            views on bioprinting, to share what they think are the   turing  supporting  vascularization  in  3D  bioprinting.  In-
            crucial questions in bioprinting. These perspective or   ternational Journal of Bioprinting, vol.3(1): 18–26.
            commentary  papers  can  be  shorter  than  a s tandard   http://dx.doi.org/10.18063/IJB.2017.01.002
            article  but  must  convey  a  clearly  outlined  point  of   3.  Lee H, Koo Y, Yeo M, et al., 2017, Recent cell printing
            view. Bioprinting is a super exciting topic all over the   systems  for  tissue  engineering.  International Journal  of
            world  now.  Many  approaches  and  diverse  focuses   Bioprinting, vol.3(1): 27–41.
            co-exist  with  one  another.  Some  views  are  even  op-  http://dx.doi.org/10.18063/IJB.2017.01.004
            posing.  Advancement  in  bioprinting  is  certainly  im-  4.  Koch  L,  Brandt  O,  Deiwick  A,  et al.,  2017,  Laser  as-
            portant,  but  perspectives  from  other  professions  are   sisted bioprinting at different wavelengths and pulse du-
            equally important.                                     rations with a metal dynamic release layer: a parametric
               In this issue, there are 3 reviews, 4 original research   study.  International Journal of Bioprinting,  vol.3(1):

            Cell powered biobots and more perspectives for IJB. © 2017 Chee Kai CHUA. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Crea-
            tive Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), permitting all non-commercial
            use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
                                                                                                            1
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10