Page 124 - IJB-7-2
P. 124

Effect of Oil Content on the Printability of Coconut Cream
           The oil separation ratio increased as the concentration   3.   Liu Z, Zhang M, Bhandari  B, 2018, Effect  of Gums on
           of the oil increased. Rheological characterization of the   the Rheological, Microstructural  and Extrusion Printing
           selected formulation of the coconut inks was performed   Characteristics  of Mashed Potatoes.  Int J Biol Macromol,
           to determine the yield stress and storage modulus       117:1179–87.
           of the inks.  The textural properties of the  inks were      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.06.048
           characterized to determine the hardness, adhesiveness,
           cohesiveness, and chewiness indexes. Coconut cream   4.   Liu Z, Bhandari B, Prakash S, et al., 2018, Creation  of
           inks of 25% water content with 10% (w/w) added coconut   Internal Structure of Mashed Potato Construct by 3D Printing
           oil did not exhibit oil separation and were suitable for   and its Textural Properties. Food Res Int, 111:534–43.
           DIW 3D printing with a yield stress of 216 Pa and       https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2018.05.075
           storage modulus of 2520 Pa. Using the ink, we fabricated   5.   Pant A, Lee AY, Karyappa R, et al., 2021, 3D Food Printing
           various 3D structures, and all printed structures were   of Fresh Vegetables Using Food Hydrocolloids for Dysphagic
           able to maintain its shape.                             Patients. Food Hydrocoll, 114:106546.
               The  nutrients  of  coconut  cream  are  considered
           to be advantageous to human health.  The antioxidant      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2020.106546
           properties of coconut cream boost the immune system   6.   Kim HW, Lee JH, Park SM, et al., 2018, Effect of Hydrocolloids
           that could prevent and treat infections. Coconut oil serves   on Rheological Properties and Printability of Vegetable Inks
           as an alternative source of oil that reduces the risk of   for 3D Food Printing. J Food Sci, 83:2923–32.
           cardiovascular disease. This method offered a simple route      https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.14391
           to control the rheological properties and stability  of the   7.   Zheng LM, Yang J, Zhang C, et al., 2020, Effect of Oil Content
           food inks and fabricate 3D colloidal food with personalized   and  Emulsifier  Type  on  the  Properties  and  Antioxidant
           oil content. Our study demonstrated 3D printing of high-
           oil-content foods, which offers potential applications in the   Activity of Sea Buckthorn Oil-in-Water Emulsions. J Food
           personalization of foods tailored for individual nutritional   Qual, 2020:8.
           needs and preferences through 3D food printing.         https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/1540925
                                                               8.   Shapiro AA, Borgonia JP, Chen QN, et al., 2016, Additive
           Acknowledgments                                         Manufacturing for Aerospace Flight Applications. J Spacecr
           C.P.L.  acknowledged  the  financial  support  from  the   Rockets, 53:952–9.
           President’s Graduate Fellowship awarded by Ministry   9.   Wang X, Ao Q, Tian X, et al., 2017, Gelatin-Based Hydrogels
           of Education (MOE), Singapore.  The authors thank       for Organ 3D Bioprinting. Polymers, 9:401.
           International Design Centre (IDC) at Singapore University   10.  Noor  N,  Shapira  A,  Edri  R, et al., 2019, 3D Printing of
           of Technology and Design (SUTD) for the project support
           (IDG11700103) and SUTD Growth Plan, Healthcare          Personalized  Thick and Perfusable Cardiac Patches and
           Sector Thrust 3-3 3D Food Printing (SGPHCRS1907).       Hearts. Adv Sci, 6:1900344.
                                                                   https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.201900344
           Conflict of interest                                11.  Shin  SR,  Farzad  R,  Tamayol A, et al.,  2016, A  Bioactive

           There are no conflicts to declare.                      Carbon Nanotube-Based Ink for Printing 2D and 3D Flexible
                                                                   Electronics. Adv Mater, 28:3280–89.
           Author contributions                                    https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201506420
           C.P.L., J.Y.H., and M.H. planned the experiments. C.P.L.   12.  Ching  T,  Li  Y,  Karyappa  R, et al., 2019, Fabrication  of
           and J.Y.H. carried out the experiments. M.H. supervised   Integrated Microfluidic Devices by Direct Ink Writing (DIW)
           the experiments. C.P.L. and M.H. wrote the paper.       3D Printing. Sens Actuators B Chem, 297:126609.

           References                                              https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2019.05.086
                                                               13.  Goh  WH, Hashimoto M,  2018, Fabrication of 3D
           1.   Liu Z, Zhang M, Yang CH, 2018, Dual Extrusion 3D Printing   Microfluidic  Channels  and  In-Channel  Features  Using  3D
               of Mashed Potatoes/Strawberry Juice Gel. LWT, 96:589–96.  Printed,  Water-Soluble  Sacrificial  Mold.  Macromol Mater
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2018.06.014           Eng, 303:1700484.
           2.   Liu Z,  Zhang M, Bhandari  B, et  al., 2018, Impact  of      https://doi.org/10.1002/mame.201700484
               Rheological Properties of Mashed Potatoes on 3D Printing.   14.  Voon SL, An J, Wong G, et al., 2019, 3D Food Printing: A
               J Food Eng, 220:76–82.                              Categorised Review of Inks and their Development. Virtual
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2017.04.017      Phys Prototyp, 14:203–18.

           120                         International Journal of Bioprinting (2021)–Volume 7, Issue 2
   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128