Page 21 - IJPS-10-1
P. 21

International Journal of
            Population Studies                                            COVID-19 and access to family planning in Africa



            lockdown of socioeconomic activities and restrictions on   services, the findings suggested a higher proportion of
            local and international travel, were implemented (Devi,   adolescent girls and women of reproductive age (less than
            2020; Hugelius et al., 2021; Zajenkowski et al., 2020).   a seven percentage point difference) had low access to
            While these control measures significantly contributed   family planning services before the COVID-19 outbreak
            to stemming the spread of the disease, they also gave   compared to during the pandemic. These results suggest
            rise to numerous negative unintended consequences,   that adolescent girls and women of reproductive age had
            such as heightened violence against women, substance   improved access to family planning services during the
            abuse, increased risky sexual activities, and reduced   COVID-19 period than before the pandemic. However,
            access to critical health-care services, such as sexual and   it is essential to consider the potential bias introduced
            reproductive  health-care  services  (Avena et al.,  2021;   by the length of the comparison periods. To confirm and
            Roesch et al., 2020; Spagnolo et al., 2020). This scoping   better understand these results, a sensitivity bias test was
            review  aims  to  furnish  key  evidence  on  the  impact  of   conducted.
            COVID-19 on access to family planning services among
            adolescent girls and women of reproductive age in SSA.  In this analysis, we compared the last 3 years preceding
                                                               the pandemic outbreak to the 2.3  years of the ongoing
              Guided by JBI’s scoping review guidelines, we included   pandemic. Coincidentally, each period comprised 13
            36 articles in our review that met our inclusion criteria.   articles. However, the COVID-19 period encompassed
            These articles focused on nine SSA countries,  spanning   one qualitative and 12 quantitative designs, while the
            the Western, Eastern, and Southern regions. There were 17   pre-COVID-19 period included one mixed-method,
            studies from West Africa, 18 from East Africa, and 1 from   one qualitative, and 11 quantitative designs. The results
            Southern Africa. The majority of the studies employed   revealed a stagnation in access to family planning services
            quantitative methodology, with slightly over one-third of   among adolescent girls and women of reproductive age.
            the reviewed papers concentrating on the COVID-19 era.  Despite recent efforts to enhance family planning services
              The restrictions imposed during the COVID-19 period   for these groups through a series of reproductive health
            appeared to exert a critical influence beyond health-care   interventions (Adedini et al., 2018; Babalola et al., 2019;
            services access, potentially impacting the execution of   Benson et al., 2018; Henry et al., 2021; Tweya et al., 2018),
            primary studies. Notably, our search procedure yielded   within the sub-region, nothing has changed in the period
            no studies directly examining the impact of  COVID-19   just before the COVID-19 period and approximately 2½
            on access to family planning services among adolescent   years into the pandemic. While it is possible that other
            girls and women in the African sub-region. However,   factors may jointly contribute to this poor access to
            to align with the focus of this review, we assessed the   family planning services among this group of interest, the
            level of contraceptive access through various family   COVID-19 pandemic likely played some role in restricting
            planning methods across studies selected for this review.   access to these reproductive health and other services in the
            These methods included CPR, mCP use, PPFP, current   region. The restriction was, in part, due to the movement
            contraceptive use, LARC, and any method of contraception,   restrictions imposed to curb the spread of the virus during
            including modern methods. For each of these method   that time.
            categories, the proportion of respondents who utilized the   Furthermore, a  comprehensive  understanding  of
            methods was employed to determine the level of access to   how movement restrictions during the lockdown could
            family planning during the periods of interest.    impact access to family planning services emerges when
              In comparing the 10-year pre-COVID-19 period     considering the underlying reasons for the low utilization
            with the 2.3  years of the COVID-19 period, the results   of these services in the sub-region. In Ethiopia, for
            revealed findings somewhat contrary to the hypothesis.   instance, during the pre-COVID-19 period, factors such
            Notably, when assessing different levels of categorizations,   as limited access to counseling and educational levels were
            a higher proportion of adolescent girls and women of   identified as common barriers to family planning service
            reproductive age had moderate access to family planning   access (Aliyu  et  al., 2015; Apanga & Adam, 2015; Esike
            services during the COVID-19 period compared to the   et al., 2017; Melkie et al., 2021; Ogboghodo et al., 2017).
            period preceding the  pandemic  outbreak.  Similarly,  in   However, throughout the period of movement restrictions,
            the comparison of these periods concerning high family   adolescent girls and women of reproductive age might
            planning services access, the results indicated that study   not have had seamless opportunities to reach their service
            subjects had approximately six more percentage points   providers for both health and other types of education.
            during the COVID-19 period than in the pre-COVID-19   Additionally,  school-age  girls  might  have been deprived
            period. Regarding low levels of access to family planning   of access to their schools. If school served as the primary


            Volume 10 Issue 1 (2024)                        15                         https://doi.org/10.36922/ijps.365
   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26