Page 29 - IJPS-10-1
P. 29

International Journal of
            Population Studies                                         SRH services among young people during COVID-19



            (ii)  To identify strategies adopted by countries in SSA to   (ii)  Concept: The concept focused on SRH services,
               mitigate the effects of the demand-supply gap for SRH   including maternal health care, contraceptive use,
               among AYA during the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic        HIV/AIDS treatment, and abortion services.
               and afterward.                                  (iii) Context: The review considered the demand and supply
            (iii) To identify lessons learned across SSA countries to   of SRH services for AYA, specifically examining the
               strengthen resilience in meeting AYA’s needs for SRH   availability of sexual and reproductive commodities
               services during health emergencies.                (drugs, pills, contraceptives, pre-exposure prophylaxis
                                                                  [PrEP], HIV drug therapy, abortion drugs, or
            2. Data and methods                                   treatment).
            This study represents a scoping review aimed at examining   2.1. Study selection
            evidence related to the demand and supply of SRH services
            for AYA during the COVID-19 pandemic in SSA. This study   The study selection process occurred in three stages. First,
            adopted  the  updated  methodological  guidance  provided   title screening was performed on resources retrieved
            by Joana Briggs Institute (JBI) (2020) (Peters et al., 2020)   from the previously mentioned databases. Second, I.O.O
            and followed the Arksey & O’Malley (2005) procedure for   and A.T.K performed a two-level screening, eliminating
            conducting a scoping review. In addition, we adhered to   studies that did not align with the study objectives. Finally,
            the guidelines outlined in the Preferred Reporting Items   O.I.O was engaged to verify all studies deemed eligible
            for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension   for abstract and full-text consideration and to resolve
            for Scoping Review (PRISMA-ScR) (Tricco et al., 2018),   any discrepancies that emerged during the initial two
            and all literature searches were imported to Covidence   reviewers’ assessments.
            ((Producer)) (https://www.covidence.org/) for extensive
            screening and data extraction.                     2.2. Eligibility criteria
              The reviewers systematically searched for articles   2.2.1. Inclusion criteria
            reporting on SRH and corresponding service utilization for   The study exclusively considered published research,
            AYA during the COVID-19 pandemic in SSA published   encompassing  both  peer-reviewed  and  gray  literature,
            between January 2020 and December 2021. To ensure an   which presented primary and secondary data. Additionally,
            exhaustive and comprehensive search, the following databases   only literature published in the English language was
            were searched: Medline Complete, Africa-Wide, SocINDEX,   included.  The  scope  of  literature  reviewed  extended  to
            Academic Search Complete (all through EBSCOhost), Public   materials reporting on SRH services for AYA during the
            Health, Social Science & Sociology databases, the Middle   COVID-19 pandemic in SSA, with a publication timeframe
            East & Africa Database (all through ProQuest), and Web of   from January 2020 to December 2021. The justification for
            Science. In addition, a hand search of all identified articles was   including articles within this specific timeframe is rooted
            carried out to locate other studies reporting on SRH services   in our intention to capture research conducted during
            for AYA during the COVID-19 pandemic in SSA. Original   the COVID-19 period, regardless of whether COVID-19
            studies in the English language were screened and considered   was the main focus of the study. For the purpose of this
            for inclusion following the JBI recommendations. Two   review, adolescents were defined as individuals within the
            independent reviewers meticulously screened all citations,   age range of 10 to 19, while young adults were considered
            full-text articles, and abstract data. A narrative summary of   to be those aged 20 to under 24 years. Both quantitative
            findings was conducted, synthesized, and presented. In the   and qualitative study designs were deemed eligible for
            electronic database search, medical subject headings (MeSH)   inclusion in this review.
            were used, and Boolean terms (NOT/OR/AND) were used
            to separate keywords. The search strings included a range   2.2.2. Exclusion criteria
            of  relevant  combinations  of  search  terms  and  keywords,   Studies published between 2020 and 2021 that collected
            encompassing “COVID-19,” “SRH services,” “adolescents,”   data  before  2019 were  excluded from  consideration.
            “young people,” “young adults,” and “sub-Saharan Africa.”  Additionally, case reports, correspondence, commentaries,

              In accordance with JBI guidelines, the inclusion criteria   opinion pieces, case series, and editorials were excluded
            for the studies were outlined in the following sub-sections,   due to their tendency to offer relatively limited evidence
            namely population, concept, and context.           for review. Comprehensive reviews, including systematic
            (i)  Population: The population  under consideration   reviews and scoping reviews, were also excluded from the
               included female AYA aged 15 – 24 years in all SSA   study selection process. Furthermore, guidelines issued by
               countries.                                      the governmental and other agencies were excluded.


            Volume 10 Issue 1 (2024)                        23                         https://doi.org/10.36922/ijps.366
   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34