Page 24 - IJPS-10-3
P. 24

International Journal of
            Population Studies                                                    Prenatal care in Santa Catarina, Brazil



              The first step in improving prenatal care in Brazil   number of visits or the beginning of prenatal care at the
            was the development of the Programa de Assistência   correct time does not ensure that patients receive all the
            Integral à Saúde da Mulher (PAISM, Program for Integral   recommended physical and laboratory examinations. In
            Assistance to Women’s Health) in the 1980s, which   2012, Anversa et al. grouped the quality of prenatal care
            expanded over subsequent years into the Política Nacional   into levels based on the fulfillment of other variables,
            de Atenção Integral à Saúde da Mulher (PNAISM,     providing a more comprehensive classification (Anversa
            National Policy for Integral Attention to Women’s Health).   et  al., 2012).
            The  Programa  de  Humanização  no  Pré-Natal  (PHPN,   The lack of uniformity in evaluation criteria results
            Prenatal Humanization Program), established in 2000 by   in large variations in measurements and complicates
            the Ministry of Health (MoH), has been guiding health-  comparisons of the studied populations. Thus, the
            care actions for pregnant women to this day. In 2011, the   objective of this study is to evaluate the quality and factors
            Cegonha network emerged to ensure the fulfillment of   associated  with  prenatal  care  for  women  admitted  for
            PHPN initiatives while defining new goals and conducts,   childbirth at a public reference maternity hospital in greater
            which, from 2012 onwards, were updated in the Basic Care   Florianópolis. The study considers the various indices
            Book for Low-Risk Prenatal Care and in the Technical   available and compliance with the current guidelines of
            Manual for High-Risk Pregnancy. Recently, GM/MS    the MoH (Brasil, 2012b) and the municipality of São José,
            Ordinance No.  2228, dated July 1, 2022, updated the   Santa Catarina (São José, 2015).
            Cegonha Network and provided qualification and funding
            for the Rede de Atenção Materna e Infantil (RAMI, Maternal   2. Methods
            and Child Care Network). Such initiatives have fostered an
            important expansion of prenatal care, reaching a coverage   2.1. Study design and area
            of over 90% of all regions in Brazil (Brasil, 2012a; Brasil,   This cross-sectional study was carried out on women
            2012b; Brasil, 2011; Brasil, 2022; Cruz et al., 2019).  who received prenatal care in the municipality of São José
              These national recommendations include early     through the Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS-Government
            prenatal care (starting with up to 12 weeks of gestation),   National Health System) and were admitted for delivery at
            its periodic and continuous provision, the performance of   the maternity hospital of the Hospital Regional de São José
            specific examinations, gestational risk classification, and   (HRSJ) from November 2021 to April 2022. This reference
            documentation in both the pregnant woman’s health record   maternity hospital is located in the municipality of São
            and pregnancy booklet (Rodrigues et al., 2020). However,   José in greater Florianópolis, in the State of Santa Catarina,
            the quality of care did not proportionally improve with the   Southern Brazil.
            increase in coverage (Leal et al., 2020; Esposti et al., 2020),   2.2. Sample design and selection procedures
            still falling short of the established recommendations
            (Pilau et al., 2014; Martin et al., 2022; Moron-Duarte et al.,   From an average of 300 monthly deliveries at this maternity
            2021).                                             hospital, including deliveries of women with high-risk
                                                               and usual-risk pregnancies, an estimated 97 deliveries
              Several parameters underlie this evaluation, including
            information recorded in the pregnant woman’s booklet,   originated from the municipality of São José. With a
                                                               total of 582 pregnant women observed over a 6-month
            specific indices, and compliance with MoH guidelines. The   collection period and considering a prevalence of 50%
            Kessner index, developed in 1973, was one of the pioneering   (unknown), relative error of 5%, and confidence level of
            and widely utilized indices in literature (Kessner et al., 1973).   95%, the minimum calculated sample size was composed
            In 1994, Milton Kotelchuck adapted the Kessner index
            to facilitate cross-population comparisons (Kotelchuck,   of 232 women.
            1994). In Brazil, the Kessner index was modified by   The study included women admitted for childbirth at
            Takeda in 1993 to align with national guidelines (Takeda,   the HRSJ maternity hospital; they were on SUS prenatal
            1993). However, the Kessner index did not align with the   care in the municipality of São José and possessed a
            Brazilian guidelines due to the incorporation of additional   prenatal booklet. Women who did not attend prenatal
            tests beyond those recommended by the original index. All   visits and those with a gestational age of <37 weeks at the
            three evaluations were carried out quantitatively, utilizing   time of delivery were excluded from the study.
            variables such as the “beginning of prenatal care” and the   Sample selection was conducted consecutively over the
            “number of physician office visits” (Cruz et al., 2019).  6-month data collection period, as there were no parameters
              Although essential for evaluation, these indices do not   indicative of heterogeneity in the population of interest.
            precisely define the quality of care since the recommended   Considering an average 48-h hospitalization period, in


            Volume 10 Issue 3 (2024)                        18                        https://doi.org/10.36922/ijps.1422
   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29