Page 62 - IJPS-10-4
P. 62

International Journal of
            Population Studies                                                   Opinions on Rohingya refugees in India



            views of the EU. Neither the EU nor the granting authority   The paper, in its earlier version, has been uploaded as a
            is responsible for the content of this article.    preprint on ResearchGate: https://www.researchgate.net/
                                                               publication/375239243_Exploring_Public_Opinion_on_
            Conflict of interest                               the_Rohingya_Refugees_Residing_in_India_An_Empirical_

            The authors declare that they have no competing interests.  Study (preprint DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.27665.61283)
            Author contributions                               References

            Conceptualization: Kristina Kironska               Abbas, T., & Hemadri, R. (2022). Rohingya refugees in India. In:
            Investigation: Monika Verma                           Rajan, S.I. (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Refugees in
            Methodology: Kristina Kironska                        India. United Kingdom; Taylor and Francis. p.1-893.
            Writing – original draft: All authors                 https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003246800
            Writing – review & editing: All authors            Adiputera, Y., & Missbach, A. (2021). Indonesia’s foreign
                                                                  policy regarding the forced displacement of rohingya
            Ethics approval and consent to participate            refugees:  Muslim  Solidarity,  humanitarianism,  and  non-
            The  FF  UP  Research  Ethics  Panel  (FF:  Philosophical   interventionism. Asia-Pacific Journal on Human Rights and
            Faculty; UP: Palacky University Olomouc) reviewed and   the Law, 22(1):69-95.
            approved the project under Ref. No. 03/2022 on April 6,      https://doi.org/10.1163/15718158-22010002
            2022. Interviewees provided verbal informed consent to   Awny, M. (2019). The Rohingya Refugee Issue: Differences in Media
            participate in the study. They were fully briefed on the   Framing in Bangladesh and India. ProQuest Dissertations
            purpose, procedures, and potential risks involved, and   and Theses; Iowa State University. Available from: https://
            their voluntary involvement was confirmed before any   www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/rohingya-refugee-
            data collection.                                      issue-differences-media-framing/docview/2382059212/
                                                                  se-2?accountid=10074 [Last accessed on 2023 Dec 21].
            Consent for publication
                                                               Basavapatna,  S.  (2018).  Where  do  #ibelong?  The  stateless
            Interviewees gave verbal consent for the publication of   Rohingya in India. In: Chaudhury, S.B.R., & Samaddar, R.
            their data in this study. They were informed that their   (Eds.), The Rohingya in South Asia: People Without a State.
            personal information would remain confidential, and all   London: Routledge.
            identifying details would be anonymized in the published      https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429467677
            results.
                                                               Bennett, W.L. (1993). Constructing publics and their opinions.
            Availability of data                                  Political Communication, 10(2):101-120.
            Data for this article are derived from the Sinophone      https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.1993.9962970
            Borderlands Indo-Pacific Survey, one of the waves of   Boomgaarden, H.G., & Vliegenthart, R. (2009). How news content
            the large-scale online Sinophone Borderlands Survey   influences anti‐immigration attitudes: Germany, 1993–2005.
            (2020 – 2022). It was conducted under the supervision of   European Journal of Political Research, 48(4):516-542.
            Richard  Q. Turcsanyi, Kristina Kironska,  Alfred Gerstl,      https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2009.01831.x
            Monika  Arnez,  Jiří  Čeněk,  Julie  Chen,  Rosalie  Chen,   Chaijaroenwatana, B., & Haque, M.M. (2020). Displaced
            Andrew Chubb, Peter Gries, and Tao Wang. The project   Rohingya and concern for non-traditional security risks in
            was convened by one of the authors of the article, Kristina   Thailand. Asian Affairs: An American Review, 47(3):201-225.
            Kironska, in collaboration with colleagues at the Palacky
            University Olomouc. While some information about the      https://doi.org/10.1080/00927678.2020.1763537
            survey project may be accessed here: www.sinofon.cz/  Chakraborty, M. (2015). Stateless and Suspect: Rohingyas in
            surveys, this data is not yet accessible in any repository   Myanmar, Bangladesh and India. Rohingyas in India: Birth
            online for reasons of exclusivity. The data underlying this   of a Stateless Community; Mahanirban Calcutta Research
            article will, however, be shared on request.          Group. Available from: https://www.mcrg.ac.in/rohingyas/
                                                                  rohingyas_publications.asp [Last accessed on 2023 Apr 15].
            Further disclosure                                 Chakraborty, M. (2018). Rohingya in Bangladesh and India

            Parts of the findings from this article have been presented   and the media planet. In:  The Rohingya in South Asia:
            at the symposium  Centering Southeast Asian Studies in   People Without a State. New York: Taylor and Francis Inc.
            the Social Sciences at the University of Texas at Austin in   p.109-133.
            February 2024.                                        https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429467677-6


            Volume 10 Issue 4 (2024)                        56                        https://doi.org/10.36922/ijps.2174
   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67