Page 12 - IJPS-11-5
P. 12

International Journal of
            Population Studies                                            Human behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic



              Levin et al. (2022) reported that at a median of 6 months   disinfectant like Purell. However,  these  practices  can
            after use, Evusheld reduced infection risk by 82.8%   induce irritant contact dermatitis, particularly in
            (95% CI: 65.8–91.4%). A meta-analysis by Glhoom et al.   healthcare professionals, who often seek out skin-friendly
            (2024) similarly found that Evusheld reduced COVID-19   cleansers to minimize irritation. In regard to hard surfaces,
            symptomatic infection by 77%. Although it was effective   cleaning with a disinfectant such as bleach or Virusend not
            against Omicron BA.1 and BA.2, later Omicron subvariants   only kills the virus on the surface but also provides lasting
            rendered it ineffective.                           protection for the surface.

              In August 2024, Invivyd, the manufacturer of       Viral infection does not occur through the drinking of
            Pemgarda, reported its phase III trial results. Through the   water, as one cannot get infected by ingesting solid foods
            first 6 months, there was an 84% infection risk reduction.   or liquids. However, swimming pools can be the source of
            Between months 7–12, there was a 64% risk reduction   an infection. Brown et al. (2021) reported that to meet the
            of symptomatic COVID in immunocompetent adults.    United Kingdom’s swimming pool regulations, infectious
            However, variants KP.3.1.1 and XEC significantly impacted   SARS-CoV-2 levels must be reduced by at least three orders
            Pemgarda neutralization rates. Subsequent studies reported   of magnitude. A pH of no more than 7.4 and free chlorine
            the same reduced effectiveness.                    above 1.5 parts per million achieved that goal.

            6.1.2. Povidone iodine nasal spray or gargle         COVID-19 primarily spreads through small, respiratory
                                                               droplets. Hence, removing them from the air would serve
            Several pre-pandemic studies reported that 0.5–1%   as another method of eliminating the virus before it comes
            povidone iodine nasal spray or gargle killed all viruses   into contact with humans. There are several ways to achieve
            in the nose or mouth. Fujii et al. (2006) reported that   this. One way is using ultraviolet light. Liu and Shan (2023)
            treatment  of  SARS-CoV-1  with  povidone  iodine   reported  that  ultraviolet  light  kills  viruses  by  disrupting
            products for 2  min reduced viral infectivity from 1.17   their RNA. Hence, inexpensive ultraviolet systems can
                6
            × 10  tissue culture infectious dose to below detectable   be installed in heating, ventilation, and air conditioning
            levels. Pelletier et al. (2020) reported that all evaluated   heating/cooling systems to inactivate viral RNA using
            concentrations of nasal antiseptics and oral rinse   human-safe,  electromagnetic waves.  However, ionization
            antiseptics completely inactivated SARS-CoV-2 after 60   does not appear to be effective at killing SARS-CoV-2.
            s. Moreover, povidone iodine nasal spray resulted in an
            8.57 times reduction of COVID-19 hospitalization and   Installing high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA)-14
            death rates (Baxter et al., 2024).                 filters is another method which is eliminating the virus
                                                               from the air. The SARS-CoV-2 virus is about 0.1 μm in
            6.2. NPIs                                          diameter. HEPA-14 filters can remove at least 99.97% of
            NPIs  are techniques  to avoid  SARS-CoV-2  infection   airborne particles that are 0.3 microns (μm) or larger in
            that are not based on vaccines or therapeutics. They   size. Fortunately, if the air is passed multiple times through
            are particularly important for immunocompromised   a HEPA-14 filter, it will remove the 0.1 μm SARS-CoV-2
            individuals. Furthermore, diabetic  individuals utilized   particles from the air. Ueki et al. (2022) reported that an
                                                               air cleaner with the HEPA filter removed SARS-CoV-2
            them more than the population average.
                                                               from the air at virus capture ratios of 85.38%, 96.03%, and
              There are two types of NPIs that keep viral particles   >99.97% at 1, 2, and 7.1 ventilation volumes, respectively.
            from entering the body. First, elimination of SARS-CoV-2   Another important factor to consider is ventilation.
            before human contact by killing the virus on surfaces, on   During the pandemic, there have been more than 2,000
            the skin, in liquids, or in the air. Second, avoid COVID-19   documented “superspreading”  events,  in which a single,
            infection by staying away from infected people or animals   infected person quickly infected many others. Almost all
            and/or their viral particles.
                                                               involved large groups in poorly ventilated indoor spaces.
            6.2.1. Elimination of SARS-CoV-2 before human      Morawska et al. (2024) reported key lessons learned from
            contact                                            the COVID pandemic on ventilation’s role as an effective
                                                               means against airborne pathogen transmission. The
            There are several aspects to consider when eliminating   authors highlighted the longstanding historical connection
            the virus before it comes into contact with humans. This   between air  quality  and infectious  diseases. Moreover,
            eradication encompasses the skin, hard surfaces, liquids,   Busato and Cavallini (2023) demonstrated the power of
            and air.                                           ventilation systems in school rooms. Interestingly, they
              Killing the virus on the skin is relatively easy. Wash   only required 1/3 the energy to keep the Italian classrooms
            it with a good soap for 20 s or use an alcohol-containing   heated compared to open windows (Figure 4).


            Volume 11 Issue 5 (2025)                        6                    https://doi.org/10.36922/IJPS025110040
   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17