Page 102 - IJPS-11-6
P. 102

International Journal of
            Population Studies                                                 Redesigning public spaces in South Africa



              Cities that actively invest in inclusive public space   2. Data and methods
            design and management are better equipped to nurture
            social inclusion, promote community well-being, and   2.1. Research design
            enhance the overall urban experience for all citizens.   This study employed a mixed-methods approach to
            The strategic prioritization  of inclusive public spaces   investigate  the  barriers  that  women  and  girls  encounter
            represents more than a matter of social justice—it is a   in  accessing  and  enjoying public  spaces,  and to  develop
            fundamental element of sustainable urban development.   actionable strategies for fostering inclusivity through
            Such investments yield tangible returns in health   the HopeScape model. The mixed-methods approach
            outcomes,  economic  vibrancy,  and  social  harmony,   combined qualitative and quantitative techniques to capture
            thereby making cities more vibrant, resilient, and livable   a comprehensive understanding of public space dynamics,
            for current and future generations (Benny  et al., 2024;   drawing on both empirical evidence and theoretical insights.
            UN-Habitat, 2023).                                   The  qualitative  component  involved  an  in-depth
            1.1.5. Demonstrating the need for inclusive public   analysis of case studies, interviews with key stakeholders
            spaces                                             (e.g., urban planners, policymakers, and community
                                                               members), and field observations. This approach helped
            The problems and disparities that continue to persist   to uncover nuanced experiences, perceptions and needs
            in urban contexts, particularly in South African cities,   specific to women and girls in diverse urban settings. The
            highlight the need for inclusive public spaces. A thorough   international case studies—such as those in Vienna and
            literature study and empirical studies revealed that access   Tunis—were selected for their recognized practices in
            to safe, accessible, and inclusive public spaces is not only   inclusive public space design, serving as benchmarks for
            desired, but also necessary for tackling multiple social,   comparison. The local case studies—Durban Beachfront,
            economic, and environmental challenges (UN-Habitat,   People’s Park, and the Watershed at the V&A Waterfront—
            2020).  In South  Africa,  as in  many other  countries,   provided  contextual insight into inclusivity in  South
            urbanization,  rapid  population  growth,  and  spatial   African cities.
            disparities have contributed to the spread of informal
            settlements, inadequate infrastructure, and restricted   The quantitative component included the use of
            access to essential services (Turok, 2014). These spatial   spatial data and safety audits to assess the physical and
            inequities have exacerbated social fragmentation,   functional aspects of public spaces. Key indicators, such as
            exclusion, and marginalization—particularly among   accessibility, safety, identity, and multifunctionality, were
            vulnerable groups, including women, children, and older   measured and compared across different sites.
            persons.                                             By integrating qualitative and quantitative methods,
              Literature indicates that traditional approaches to   this research ensures a holistic examination of the factors
            public  space  design and  management  have frequently   that influence the inclusivity of public spaces. The mixed-
            perpetuated these inequities, with many public spaces   methods design also facilitates triangulation, enhancing the
            characterized by poor upkeep, insufficient amenities,   reliability and validity of the findings. This comprehensive
            and limited accessibility. As a result, women and girls,   approach aligns with the study’s objective of proposing a
            in particular, encounter major impediments in accessing   practical and evidence-informed framework for inclusive
            and enjoying public spaces, including safety concerns,   urban design in South Africa.
            harassment, and inadequate amenities. According to   2.2. Data collection
            previous studies, exclusionary public spaces can intensify
            social tensions, reinforce existing inequalities, and hamper   The data collection process involved gathering information
            efforts to create cohesive and resilient urban communities   from both primary and secondary sources to provide a
            (Whitzman et al., 2014). In contrast, inclusive public spaces   robust foundation for the development of the HopeScape
            can foster social cohesion, encourage social interaction,   model.
            and cultivate a sense of belonging and ownership among
            diverse urban populations (UN-Habitat, 2016). Therefore,   2.2.1. Case study selection
            the need to design and maintain inclusive public spaces   The research employed a multi-scalar approach by
            is evident. Cities that prioritize inclusion in public space   selecting both international and South African case studies
            design and management may address structural disparities,   to critically assess inclusive public space design practices.
            foster social cohesion, and provide welcoming, safe, and   Internationally, Vienna (city of Austria) and Tunis (city
            accessible environments for all residents, regardless of age,   of Tunisia) were chosen for their notable commitment to
            gender, or socioeconomic position.                 gender-sensitive planning and participatory urbanism.


            Volume 11 Issue 6 (2025)                        96                        https://doi.org/10.36922/ijps.5813
   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107