Page 20 - IJPS-2-1
P. 20

Nonparametric graduation techniques as a common framework for the description of demographic patterns

       cent Swedish data. The bulge during the young ages appears around age 20 and the older one around
       age  40. This  phenomenon  has also started to  appear  in  the data sets of Finland and Ireland.  In
       these cases, simple models fail to closely estimate the tails and the peak value of the marriage dis-
       tribution. We thus fitted the mixture model MC-M to the data sets. Figures 20–22 provide illustra-
       tions of the results.
         According to the values of the minimizing criterion, for the majority of the cases the C-M model
       provides the best fits among the parametric models. The second best fit is usually obtained by the
       GLG one.
         As mentioned above, a variety of factors related to the socioeconomic and cultural background of
       male and female populations may contribute to the appearance  of the  heterogeneity in the
       first-marriage curve. However in order to be able to verify or reject all these hypotheses about het-
       erogeneity in the first-marriage curve, further research based on empirical evidence is required.
         Turning now to the SVM, we observed from the values of the residual sum of squares as well as
       from the graphical illustration, that their performance is superior in comparison to any other para-
       metric approach. In the vast majority of the data sets, the values of the residual sum of squares were
       in significantly lower levels than those resulting by model fitting. It is probably worth mentioning
       that this technique  works  with high  accuracy in both homogeneous and heterogeneous data sets,
       while for the later cases more complicated models are required. Taking a closer look at the figures,
       we observed that SVM performance is highly superior to parametric modelling, in the peaks and the
       tables of the marriage distributions where parametric modelling provides systematic deviations from
       the empirical rates.

       Table 4. Values of (4.3), multiplied by 100.000, at the exit of the estimation procedure
       FEMALES
              SSE*10   6           Standard Coale-McNeil        GLG           Coale-McNeil       Kernel     SVM
          Spain
          1995                       62308                     17358          14058              788        216
          2002                       46959                     14321          12446              731        185
          Greece
          2001                       54891                     8333           63228              331        214
          2002                       54891                     8333           63228              289        329
          Italy
          1990                       38956                     8654            8251             2431       2706
          2000                       47607                     8605            6597              603        312
          Germany
          1998                       27263                     4936            4761              786        517
          2001                       19583                     3331            3137              279        195
          Netherlands
          1996                       19516                     2661            2563              859       1144
          2002                       40108                     8705            8171              372        201
          Norway
          1996                       29525                     8001            7828             1746       3986
          2002                       20803                     5770            5291              352        539
          UK
          1996                       12060                     2271            2226              449        223
          1999                      214910                     10280          10278              759        241

       14                 International Journal of Population Studies | 2016, Volume 2, Issue 1
   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25