Page 60 - IJPS-8-1
P. 60

International Journal of
            Population Studies                                             Cognitive functioning and active life engagement




            Table 3. Estimates of logistic regression for engagement of six types of activities in 2018 (n=1015)
            Variables                   Economic   Household   Recreational   Physical   Sedentary    Social
                                         work        work        activity     activity     time     connection
            Engagement of activities in 2015  2.03***  2.17***   2.21***       2.05***     1.36       1.99***
            Gender (Women for reference)  1.42*      0.18***      1.36 +        1.01       1.15        0.84
            Age                          0.93***     0.97*        1.00          1.00       0.99        1.02*
            Marital status (Single for reference)  1.15  0.68     0.75          0.82       0.80        1.07
            Education (Illiterate for reference)  0.92  1.00      1.21          0.95       0.97        0.91
            Annual income                1.13*        0.99        1.08          0.95       0.96        0.88*
            Living alone                  0.75        1.24        0.73          0.94       0.70        1.49 +
            Social support 1              0.95        0.98        0.97          1.06       0.95        0.99
            Social support 2              1.04        0.95        0.97          1.02       1.08        0.97
            Social support 3              0.98        1.01        1.06          0.96       0.89*       0.97
            Having diabetes               1.46        1.59        1.49          1.22       0.94        1.54 +
            Having hypertension           0.86        1.03        0.95         1.33*       0.95        1.16
            Having cardiovascular disease  1.11       0.93        1.04          1.26       0.89        0.88
            ADLs                         1.09***     1.06***      1.02         1.04*       0.99        1.04*
            Cognitive function            1.02       1.09***     1.08***       1.03 +      0.96       1.06**
            Cognitive decline             0.81       0.66*       0.56***       0.73*       1.44 +      1.00
            Constant                      0.74        1.45        0.15         0.07*      88.73*      0.03**
            LR Chi2                      271.04      182.40       116.00       57.67       18.20       78.14
            Pseudo R2                    0.1949      0.1606       0.0978       0.0430     0.0248      0.0558
            Significance levels: +P < 0.1, *P < 0.05, *P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.

              Only  among  the  subsets  who  participated  in  each   participating in sedentary recreational activities, 88%
            of  the  six  types  of  activities  in  2018  (duration  hours   spending 5 h on average for sedentary time. Only 38% and
            >0), we run the OLS regression models to examine the   46% engaged in physical activity and socially connected
            impacts of cognitive functioning level in 2015 and its   activity, respectively. The impacts of cognitive functioning
            decline on intensity of participating six types of activities,   on probability and intensity of active life engagement varied
            respectively. The estimates of OLS regression after   by activities’ type. After controlling baseline participation
            controlling participating intensity of six types of activities   or intensity of activities, respectively, socialdemographic
            at  baseline  (including  duration  hours  =  0),  respectively,   characteristics and physical health, cognitive functioning,
            socialdemographic characteristics, and physical health are   and its decline significantly associated with house work,
            as shown in Table 4. The level of cognitive functioning was   recreational activity, physical activity, and socially
            not significantly correlated to participating intensity of   connected activity. These findings highlight the importance
            any of the six types of activity besides that the association   of promoting cognitive functioning to facilitate the active
            between cognitive functioning and intensity of social   life engagement.
            connected activity was significant at 10% level. Cognitive   Consistent with some previous studies (Chou, Chow,
            functioning decline in follow-up only significantly reduced   and Chi, 2004; Dong, Li, and Simon, 2014; Gauthier and
            the frequency of participating social connected activity.  Smeeding, 2003), we found that the majority of older adults

            4. Discussion                                      (over 70%) in rural China averagely spend more than 3 h
                                                               in sedentary recreational activities (such as watching TV
            Active life engagement has been identified as a critical   and reading or listening to radio) or just in sedentary time
            indicator of successful aging. The study examined the   for rest (such as napping or doze off). Only about one third
            patterns of time-use in older adults of rural China using   and 45% of respondents engaged in physical activity and
            the two waves of time diary data from rural China. On   socially connected activity, respectively. However, more
            an absolute level, participants had low levels of active life   than half of rural Chinese older adults still averagely spent
            engagement with more than 70% of rural older adults   4  h on economic work. The previous studies suggested


            Volume 8 Issue 1 (2022)                         54                    https://doi.org/10.36922/ijps.v8i1.1301
   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65