Page 11 - IJPS-8-2

International Journal of
Population Studies Psychosocial stress and risk assessment during the COVID-19 pandemic

Medo Gutić; visualization: Milanko Čabarkapa, Teodora on employees and organizations during the COVID-19
Safiye and Medo Gutić; and supervision: Medo Gutić. All pandemic: A systematic literature review. Frontiers in
authors have read and agreed to the published version of Psychology, 1639:848778.
the manuscript. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.848778.
Ethical approval Safiye T and Vukčević B. (2020). Dimensions of general
psychological distress and age as the predictors of
Not applicable as this paper does not involve human procrastination in university students. Psihološka
subjects. Istraživanja, 28(2):187-200.

Availability of supporting data https://doi.org/10.5937/psistra23-27810.
Safiye T, Vukčević B and Čabarkapa, M. (2021). Resilience as
Data utilized to this paper are from secondary sources and a moderator in the relationship between burnout and
available to the public. subjective well-being among medical workers in Serbia
during the COVID-19 pandemic. Vojnosanitetski Pregled,
References 78(11):1207-13.

Beck U. (1992). Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. United https://doi.org/10.2298/vsp210517070s.
States: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Seneviratne K, Baldry D and Pathirage C. (2010). Disaster
Biggs A, Brough P and Drummond S. (2017). Lazarus and knowledge factors in managing disasters successfully.
Folkman’s psychological stress and coping theory. In: International Journal of Strategic Property Management,
Cooper CL and Quick JC, editors. The Handbook of Stress 14(4):376-90.
and Health: A Guide to Research and Practice. United States:
Wiley Blackwell. p. 351-64. https://doi.org/10.3846/ijspm.2010.28.
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118993811.ch21 Vujčić I, Safiye T and Milikić B, et al. (2021). Coronavirus disease
2019 (COVID-19) epidemic and mental health status in the
Borodzicz E. (2005). Risk, Crisis and Security Management. West general adult population of Serbia: A cross-sectional study.
Sussex: John Wiley and Sons Ltd. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public
Božović M, Mihajlović E and Živković S. (2019). Risk management Health, 18(4):1957.
in the context of multi-risk assessment. FactaUniversitatis, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18041957.
Series: Working and Living Environmental Protection,
16(3):161-9. Weber EU. (2001). Decision and choice: Risk, empirical studies. In:
Smelser NJ and Baltes B, editors. International Encyclopedia
https://doi.org/10.22190/fuwlep1903161b. of the Social and Behavioral Sciences. United Kingdom:
Brown VJ. (2014). Risk perception: it’s personal. Environmental Elsevier Science. p. 11274-6.
Health Perspectives, 122(10):A276-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/b0-08-043076-7/01782-4.
https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.122-A276.
White F. (1974). Natural Hazards: Local, National, Global. Oxford:
Čabarkapa M. (2016). Stress-General Models, Causes and Effects. Oxford University Press.
Belgrade: Institute of Psychology, Faculty of Philosophy.
Witte K, Meyer G and Martell D. (2001). Effective Health Risk
Mun S, Moon Y and Kim H, et al. (2021). Current discussions Messages. United States: Sage Publications.

Volume 8 Issue 2 (2022) 5 https://doi.org/10.36922/ijps.v8i2.1335