Page 111 - ITPS-8-2
P. 111

INNOSC Theranostics and
            Pharmacological Sciences                                                     Drug-induced hypoglycemia



            2.5. Additional clinical findings                  Post-intervention outcomes showed stable blood glucose

            2.5.1. Urine examination                           levels and improved renal function, reinforcing the
                                                               importance of selecting antidiabetic agents based on the
            Urine analysis showed mild proteinuria (+1) without   patient’s renal status and overall health condition.
            microscopic hematuria. No growth was found on the
            urine culture, ruling out active infections. The history of   The patient’s medical history, including urosepsis,
            nephrolithiasis and prior urosepsis was considered relevant   nephrolithiasis, and acute-on-CKD, complicated the
            to the baseline of patient with CKD.               challenges of drug clearance and pharmacokinetics. CKD
                                                               can impair the excretion of medications, leading to drug
            2.5.2. Comorbidities and therapies                 accumulation and an increased risk of adverse effects. In
            The patient had hypertension, which was managed with   this case, the combination therapy likely exacerbated the
            losartan and amlodipine, and dyslipidemia treated with   risk of hypoglycemia due to the reduced renal clearance
            atorvastatin. His HbA1c level was 10.5 g/dL, indicative of   of glimepiride and the impaired gluconeogenic capacity
            CKD-induced anemia.                                associated with CKD.
            2.5.3. Outcome and clinical implications           3.1. Pathophysiological mechanisms for increased
                                                               hypoglycemia risk in CKD
            Glycemic control improved significantly without further
            hypoglycemic episodes. Linagliptin proved to be effective   Patients  with  CKD  are  particularly  susceptible  to
            and safe, stabilizing blood glucose levels and preventing   hypoglycemia owing to the following mechanisms:
            further renal compromise.                          1.  Reduced renal clearance of insulin: Impaired kidney
                                                                  function prolongs insulin half-life, increasing systemic
              This   case  underscores  the  importance  of       levels.
            individualized DM management in patients with renal   2.  Diminished gluconeogenesis: CKD compromises
            impairment. Healthcare providers should carefully assess   renal gluconeogenesis, a key counter-regulatory
            pharmacokinetics and comorbidities when selecting     process in hypoglycemia prevention.
            antidiabetic therapies  to balance glycemic  control  with   3.  Coexistent malnutrition and anemia: CKD-associated
            minimized adverse effects.                            anemia and reduced caloric intake lower glycogen
            3. Discussion                                         stores and weaken hypoglycemia responses.
                                                               4.  Enhanced sensitivity to hypoglycemic agents: Drugs
            This  case  report  highlights  the  clinical  challenges  of   such as sulfonylureas and insulin are cleared more
            managing a 61-year-old male patient with T2DM,        slowly in CKD, amplifying their effects.
            hypertension, and CKD, emphasizing the recurrent
            hypoglycemic  episodes  associated  with  the  combination   3.2. Assessing the cause of hypoglycemia
            therapy of glimepiride, metformin, and voglibose. The   The patient had multifactorial hypoglycemic episodes,
            report underscores the need for tailoring antidiabetic   driven by both CKD-related alterations in metabolism and
            therapy to individual patient factors such as renal   the pharmacodynamics of glimepiride, metformin, and
            impairment and comorbidities.                      voglibose. Glimepiride’s prolonged action due to reduced
              The  combination  of  glimepiride,  metformin,  and   renal clearance, coupled with impaired compensatory
            voglibose is a widely used regimen for managing T2DM.   mechanisms such as gluconeogenesis, significantly
            Glimepiride, a sulfonylurea, stimulates pancreatic beta cells   contributed to the hypoglycemia observed.
            to release insulin, metformin, a biguanide, reduces hepatic   3.3. Implications for clinical practice
            glucose production and enhances insulin sensitivity,
            and voglibose, an alpha-glucosidase inhibitor, delays   T2DM management in CKD requires careful consideration
            carbohydrate absorption,  reducing postprandial glucose   of drug pharmacokinetics and potential adverse
            spikes. Despite their efficacy, these agents are associated   effects. Adjusting or discontinuing agents with a high
            with an increased risk of hypoglycemia, particularly in   hypoglycemia risk is essential to avoid complications.
            vulnerable populations such as those with CKD.     In this case, replacing the combination therapy with
                                                               linagliptin  improved  glycemic  control  without  inducing
              In this case, substituting linagliptin for the previous
            combination therapy effectively improved glycemic control   further hypoglycemia.
            and minimized the risk of hypoglycemia. Linagliptin   Regular monitoring  of  renal  function and glycemic
            is safe for the kidneys and aligns with current clinical   control, along with close patient–provider collaboration,
            guidelines  for  managing  diabetes  in  patients  with  CKD.   is critical to ensure safe and effective diabetes and CKD


             Volume 8 Issue 2 (2025)                       105                               doi: 10.36922/itps.7355
   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116