Page 89 - JCAU-4-2
        P. 89
     Chinese Exceptionalism in Architecture and Urban Design                                                                            Wong
               2.3  Spaces in Beijing and China beyond        move us away from a simplistic category of
               Professor  of  architectural  history,  Cole   neoliberal  freedom  to  a  situatedness  of
               Roskam,  clarifies  early  in  the  book  that   uneven  economic  and  social  agendas.  He
               “reform was not an exercise in neoliberalism”   analyzes  that  Chinese  exceptionalism  is  a
               (p.  17)   [7] .  He  cautions  against  the  blind   spatial project from the start, and as is known
               application of the global neoliberal turn in the   today that it continues to implicate spatially.
               1970s  and  1980s,  and  instead  notes  the
               specificity  in  Chinese  society,  including  its   3.  ARCHITECTURAL       TYPOLOGY
               socialist  roots  and  authoritarian  ruling.  He   AND AUTHORSHIP
               writes,  “reform…  was  above  all,  an  act  of   The   last   section   concludes   spatial
                                                  [7]
               unprecedented creativity” (p. 250)  , as he    observations and elaborates on how the three
               details  the  innovative  state  apparatuses  and   books  use  architectural  and  urban  design
               public-private collaboration models that came   examples  in  further  explicating  Chinese
               out  of  a  spirit  of  experimentation  and   exceptionalism. Here, architecture is defined
               improvisation,  birthing  spaces  of  unlikely   through  a  cross-examining  reading  between
               consequences. As he perceptively calls early   the  interrelated  lenses  of  typology  and
               on,    “architecture   helps   to   produce    authorship.
               contributing  citizens  of  societies  and  the     Architectural   historian   and   critic
               social structures upon which people depend,    Anthony  King’s  perspective  is  drawn  to
               regardless as to whether those structures are   unfold  the  infrastructural  qualities  of
               capitalist  or  socialist  in  their  ideological   architectural practice, which as he defines, the
               composition”  (p.  14)   [7]   —  simply  put,   former both shaped and is shaped by the latter.
               architecture  is  not  the  same  as  ideology.   In  Building  and  Society,  he  poses  first  and
               Echoing this quote, Roskam’s spatial analysis   foremost  two questions at once: “What can
               does not try to pigeonhole spaces into global,   we understand about a society by examining
               ideological  patterns,  but  digs  deep  in    its buildings and physical environment? What
               everyday practices in which common people      can  we  understand  about  buildings  and
               transform  and  adapt  spaces  into  individual,   environments  by  examining  the  society  in
               concretized    pockets     of   expediency,    which  they  exist”  (p.  1)   [8] ?  Rather  than
               makeshift-ness,  and  contingencies.  Roskam   treating architecture as aesthetic objects, King
               offers  a  phenomenal  account  of  a  post-   reacts  by  highlighting  architecture  as
               socialism landscape brimming with Chinese      simultaneously  socially  conditioned  and
               characteristics.  One  of  the  most  illustrative   conditioning society. This influential stance is
               moments is his analysis of the early reform    undeniably  essential  in  understanding  these
               choreography that the government carefully     authors.
               curated  to  foreign  guests  coming  to            The     interrelated   questions     of
               experience  socialist  China.  It  includes    architectural  type  and  authorship  surface  in
               exclusive  hotels  with  elaborate  amenities,   discussions of an architectural infrastructure.
               those that were considered bourgeois luxuries   Type and authorship are in fact two faces of
               in  the  then  impoverished  China.  He  takes   the same question for architecture. Consider
               fascination  in  the  ideological  chasm       Mario Carpo’s provocation of conceiving an
               contained in an urban space, documenting the   authorial ambition of architecture parallel to a
               spatial  protocols  such  as  hotel  security  and   process  of  technological  advancements   [9] ,
               built  barriers  of  access,  segregating  the   together with Anthony Vidler’s invitation to
               proletarian  locals  from  foreign  visitors.  He   think  typologies  through  a  need  for  an
               contrasts  between  elaborate  hotel  interiors,   ontological  validation   [10] ,  both  questions
               such  as  the  East  Addition  Dining  Room  of   point  to  a  consolidation  of  architectural
               Beijing  Hotel,  with  the  outside  geography   expertise  and  institution  of  knowledge  as
               suffering  from  the  Cultural-Revolution-     politically  motivated.  These  authors  tackle
               induced  poverty.  This  image  he  constructs   this  double  emergence  of  architectural  type
                AccScience Publishing                                                                  4
     	
