Page 36 - JCAU-5-1
P. 36

Journal of Chinese
            Architecture and Urbanism                                                 The life and work of Arata Isozaki



            completion of MOCA sets the stage for a four-decade-long   A spectacular competition-winning design for Tokyo’s New
            international career. However, clashes with the museum   City Hall (1985) was never built – although ideas from this key
            project overseers almost led to Isozaki walking away. It is   project kept re-emerging in the office in later proposals. The
            little known that the project nearly stopped when a building   typology of the large “ground-scraper” would occupy Isozaki
            committee forced Isozaki into a design he repudiated in the   for his entire career. Its large and airy indoor/outdoor atrium
            press. However, failure in Los Angeles would have forced   sliced by bridges re-emerged 10 years later for the Potsdamer
            him  to retreat to  Japan in  humiliation  Giovanni (2022)   Platz buildings C2/C3 in Berlin. Our proposal was the only
            writes, “Following the advice of the Los Angeles architect   non-skyscraper project in the design competition. The strategy
            Frank Gehry, Mr. Isozaki won the support of a group of   was clever: when one turns a skyscraper on its side, creating
            museum trustees, who rescued his design and, with it, both   a “ground-scraper,” all of its intimidating “bullying power”
            the project and his reputation.” In the end, Isozaki’s ideas   dissipates into a humbler serenity.
            remained mostly intact, with numerous critics praising the   Isozaki commented that the phase of the Cold War era
            spatial sequence and refined lighting.             had ended, and this shift created an entirely new globalized
              The  Team Disney headquarters  building  in  Orlando,   situation, which followed the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989
            Florida (evidence of the architect’s growing popularity   and the bursting of Japan’s economic bubble in 1992.
            in the US), was overloaded with symbolic meaning and   Typical works from this phase include:
            colorful geometries: it resembled nothing ever built before
            and incorporates influences from Pop Art and postmodern   •   KitaKyushu Central Library (1973 – 1974), Fukuoka,
            humor, including the tongue-in-cheek metaphor of the   Japan
            main entry gate, in the form of Mickey Mouse’s ears.   •   Tsukuba  Center  Building (1979  –  1983),  Tsukuba,
            Two long office wings meet at a giant, cone-shaped lobby,   Japan
            which was brightly colored and equipped as a sundial. The   •   The  Museum  of  Contemporary  Art,  MOCA
            building became an instantly identifiable icon.       (1981 – 1986), Los Angeles, California, USA
                                                               •   Palau Sant Jordi Stadium (1983 – 1990), Barcelona,
              Isozaki embodied the 1980s like hardly any other    Spain; sports arena for the 1992 Summer Olympics;
            architect of the second half of the 20  century – a time   followed by the Palafolls Sports Complex Pavilion
                                           th
            that,  stylistically, allowed everything. Isozaki could  do   (1987 – 1996), Barcelona, Spain
            postmodernism so much better than the others could, and   •   New Tokyo City Hall (1985 – 1986, unbuilt), Tokyo,
            appeared to enjoy himself in the process. In architecture,   Japan
            the 1980s meant a new era of beauty, sensuality, and an   •   Kamioka Town Hall (1975 – 1978), Kamioka, Japan
            aura of mystery. These were different times compared   •   Team Disney Orlando (1987 – 1991), Florida, USA
            to  today.  Today,  in  Japan,  the  interest  in  classic  beauty   •   Bond University, Library and Administration Building
            and large, unmistakable geometrical forms is declining;   (1987 – 1989), Gold Coast, Australia
            while, in China, there appears to be a revival of interest   •   Kitakyushu International Conference Center (1987 –
            in neoclassical architecture. Moreover, the overview was   1990), Fukuoka, Japan
            still possible: one simply knew who “Big Jim” was. One   •   Hara Museum ARC of Contemporary Art (1990,
            just knew who Hollein was, who Philip Johnson and     extended 2008), Gunma, Japan
            Frank Gehry were, and of course who Isozaki was. These
            six eccentric architects were just legendary, and that is   5.3. Phase III (1990 – 2000): Architecture as a
            fascinating. I  do not know if our present time can still   sculptural statement and experiment
            produce such legends. In hindsight, it seems that aura   The third phase of his career can best be described as a
            ended and by 2000 was gone. By normal standards, it   paradigm shift toward the thought that “anything seems
            was  sometimes  hard  to  digest  what  these  trend-setting   possible,” further garlanding his career with high-profile
            architects designed at the time. They embodied the spirit   projects and clients, firmly establishing Isozaki as the most
            of the ’80s, when you simply dared, still put everything on   influential figure in Japanese architecture in this decade: by
            one card. It was a time that allowed open discussion about   now, his position was influential and truly international.
            aesthetics, beauty, and proportion, a time that consumed   Edan Corkill noted: “If the entire Japanese architectural
            everything. Furthermore, it consumed the eccentric people   fraternity  was one  big  royal  family,  then  Arata Isozaki
            in a strange way. Now, one has the feeling that the next   would be a king approaching the end of a long and glorious
            guard no longer has any understanding of this time. Many   reign” (Corkill, 2008, p. 4). Indeed, during this phase, his
            young people interested in architecture and design theory   influence gradually spread further afield, mirroring the
            do not even know these names and works.            further growth of his stature.


            Volume 5 Issue 1 (2023)                         11                        https://doi.org/10.36922/jcau.353
   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41