Page 72 - JCAU-5-2
P. 72

Journal of Chinese
            Architecture and Urbanism                                          Chinese troglodyte villages toward tourism



            connected enhancement process as well. Thus, all   (iv). Reuse: it refers to UBH elements that have been
            typologies considered are expressions of the local and   dismissed regarding their primary function but reused
            national history and culture, potentially leading to both   within another function.
            heritage-led economic development and the straightening   (v).  Re-building: it refers to new cave elements built
            of the places’ identity.                              following the historical techniques adopted for
              This method has been utilized and refined during    the construction of UBH, responding to the same
            several ongoing projects; thus, some categories were   functions as the new ones.
            re-elaborated and/or modified concerning the already   In China, interpretation, protection, abandonment,
            published methodology. At this stage, the method provides   reuse, and re-building were all adopted from case to case
            a functional analysis (Figure 1).                  regarding different elements included in the UBH class.
              The functional classification points out eight UBH   3.2. Selection of Chinese yaodong as case studies
            functions –  sanitary,  water,  living  space,  religion,
            defense, economy, food, and transport, each connected   The present study was based on field research carried out
            to the underground management of correspondent     in the pre-COVID period. The latest data collection was
            environmental conflicts, social interactions, or both.  conducted between 2017 and 2018.
              The  methodology  can  also  be  adapted  to  study   Initially, the research focused on an overview of the
            historical reuses, both from one function to another and   most representative Chinese elements from the UBH
            about different uses within the same function.     class (Figure  2). The religious function, Buddhist caves,
                                                               rupestrian churches, and necropolis were classified. The
              At a theoretical level, concerning the current situation   defense and escape tunnels were listed. The economic
            after dismissing the UBH elements regarding their primary   and historical mines were studied. The food preparation
            function, the  protocol  defines  four  possible alternatives:   and historical granaries were considered. For sanitary,
            interpretation, protection, abandonment, and reuse. A fifth   we focused on historical sewers. For the water study, we
            hypothesis, that is, re-building, refers to the construction   selected buried channels. Finally, for living space, cave
            of new UBH elements by adopting the same technology for   villages known as yaodong were studied.
            the construction of UBH elements.
            (i).  Interpretation: it refers to UBH elements at the core of   Yaodong forms, while showing common elements,
               enhancement projects.                           reveal the broad range of housing-type solutions. Each has
            (ii). Protection: it refers to UBH elements included in   emerged from specific environmental and social conditions
               protected areas but not exploited as cultural heritage   characteristic of the plateau area at different times in the
               elements.                                       past (Golany, 1992; Knapp, 2000; Wang, 2016).
            (iii). Abandonment: it refers to abandoned elements   In general, a yaodong is an artificial cave created by
               of UBH.                                         excavating the earth and transformed into a living space


























                                 Figure 1. The Underground Built Heritage chart. Source: Diagram by Roberta Varriale


            Volume 5 Issue 2 (2023)                         4                        https://doi.org/10.36922/jcau.0940
   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77