Page 80 - JCAU-5-2
P. 80

Journal of Chinese
            Architecture and Urbanism                                          Chinese troglodyte villages toward tourism



            depend on China itself. However, one of the main critical   valuable resource to celebrate and preserve and, when
            issues is the lack of a study protocol that allows for an   sustainable, to reuse and enhance, realizing its full
            adequate understanding.                            potential to support local community development (Pace
              The lack of a study approach so far has been the basis   & Salvarani, 2021).
            of the lack of recognition of the high value and potential   Cave dwellings in the Mediterranean basin are better-
            of most of these sites. In fact, where there has been   known, thanks to historical and comparative studies
            an adequate understanding and interpretation of this   (Laureano, 1993; Urdiales & Maccarone, 2011; Horden
            heritage, there have been cases of successful conservation   & Kinoshita, 2014). Furthermore, the project Vernacular
            and  enhancement,  as  demonstrated by  the  few  cases  of   Knowledge for Sustainable Architecture (VerSus) gave
            troglodyte settlements included in the UNESCO List. More   a big input toward their knowledge. It was a European
            commonly, these precious treasure nests of information   initiative developed in the framework of Culture
            and examples of living heritage are completely undervalued   2007–2013 program, which partners with CRAterre-
            and left abandoned or sacrificed to urban development.  Ecole Nationale Supérieure d’Architecture de Grenoble
              Our research highlights that, at a global level, there are   (France), Escola Superior Gallaecia (Portugal), DIDA
            still many fundamental steps to go through to approach the   (Department of Architecture, University of Florence-
            topic and define a framework for heritage-led sustainable   Italy), DDICAAR (Department of Civil Engineering,
            strategies for underground rural settlements. More   Environment, and Architecture, University of Cagliari-
            specifically, a universally recognized and shared glossary,   Italy), and Escuela Técnica Superior de Arquitectura
            a universally recognized classification for troglodyte   of Polytechnic University of Valencia, Spain (Vegas
            architecture, the census and systematization of troglodyte   et al., 2014).
            settlements on every national scale are all necessary steps   Hence, a partial comparison is presented below between
            in a first phase of both a quantitative and qualitative   a Chinese case and some worldwide famous underground
            analysis of this kind of heritage. In the second phase,   settlements, mostly in the Mediterranean area, some of
            the improvement of the interpretation, communication,   which have already been studied according to the UBH
            educational, enhancement, and management practices   methodology (Varriale, 2014; Varriale, 2021).
            will provide bases for elaborating conscious strategies for
            protecting and developing these contexts. In this scenario,   The comparison is summarized in Table 4. All examples
            the  comparative  analysis  of  international  cases  is  very   are located on plateaus at a latitude between 32° (the Libyan
            complicated. Attempts have been made in this direction,   case) and 40° (the Italian case). Differences were found in
            for example, in the context of the project Underground for   current uses: only Gharyan (Tripoli), Matmata (Tunisia),
            Value (COST ACTION 18110, 2019-2023), leaded by the   Kandovan (Iran), and Lijiashan (China) are still inhabited
            National Research Council of Italy (CNR) and involving   by the locals, while in the other cases, underground
            the authors. This project involved more than 200 members   settlements are mostly interpreted as examples of
            from 32 countries. It has experienced the interdisciplinary   traditional lifestyle, protected in natural areas, or inscribed
            approach for promoting the UBH methodology as a    in protection lists or reused.

            Table 4. UBH RE-USE classification in cases from different countries
             Site         Country                                 Data and information
                                      Name of the plateau  Meters o.s.l.  Latitude    Inhabited    Interpretation
            Gharyan       Libya       Jabal Nafüsah         700 o.s.l.   32°10' N        x             x
            Matmata       Tunisia     Matmata Plateau       600 o.s.l.   33°32 N         x             x
            Sassi Matera  Italy       Murge Plateau         401 o.s.l.   40°40' N                      x
            Kandovan      Iran        Iran/Persian Plateau  2300 o.s.l.  37°47 N         x
            Derinkuyu     Turkey      Anatolian Plateau    1300 o.s.l.   38°37 N                       x
            Ürgup         Turkey      Anatolian Plateau    1050 o.s.l.   38°38 N                       x
            Göreme        Turkey      Anatolian Plateau    1104 o.s.l.   38°38 N                       x
            Avanos        Turkey      Anatolian Plateau     920 o.s.l.   34°42 N                       x
            Lijiashan     China       Loess Plateau        2628 o.s.l.   36°52 N         x
            This table illustrates the UBH RE-USE classification tested in cases from different countries. Abbreviation: o.s.l., over the sea level. Source: Table by
            Roberta Varriale


            Volume 5 Issue 2 (2023)                         12                       https://doi.org/10.36922/jcau.0940
   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85