Page 11 - JCAU-6-3
P. 11

Journal of Chinese
            Architecture and Urbanism                                                        Is it a matter of design?



            abstract generalizations and contingent design cannot be   explore the sustainably oriented potential embedded in its
            entirely bridged, the article offers operative tools whose   transformation. If, as claimed by Xiangning Li, curator of
            responsible use falls under the sensibility of their users,   the Chinese Pavilion “Building a Future Countryside” at
            whether  they  are policymakers, planners,  or  architects.   the Architecture Biennale of Venice of 2018, “how to self-
            The contribution presenting the landscape project for   locate within the coordinates of East-West and tradition
            Yulong Village, Hainan (Wu et al., 2024, p. 15), unfolds   modernity is the ultimate question that every Chinese
            as a research-driven design strategy where “green   architect must answer” (Li, 2019, p. 4), the design stories
            infrastructure has the potential to realize the mutual   synthesized in this special issue clearly suggest that these
            support and promotion of ecological security, cultural   negotiations are not necessarily a downward compromise
            heritage, and economic development in Li villages.”   but can pave the way to new understandings of the larger
            The design actions here are supported by preliminary   project to reshape rural China.
            research, demonstrating the coherence of their approach
            to site modification that is sensible to environmental   Conflict of interest
            and cultural sustainability. Despite its inherent logical   The author declares that there are no competing interests.
            processuality, design is here again at the end of the chain of
            acts and remains vulnerable to ideological constructs’ bias.   References
            Conversely, Ramondetti (2023) endorses a more empirical   Berta, M., Bruno, E., Ramondetti, L., & Xu, H. (2023). Prosperous
            position toward the outcomes of his and other entries’   Lishui. A  Project  for Suburban  China. Novato, CA: ORO
            designs. The presented projects have already undergone   Editions.
            a selection process, portraying scenarios judged as more   Bolchover, J., & Lin, J. (2014).  Rural Urban Framework.
            compelling or feasible than others. Once the boundary   Transforming the Chinese Countryside. Basel: Birkhäuser.
            conditions  are established,  design  goals,  methods,  and
            outcomes are displayed in three variants, creating space for   Chen, X., Wei, H., Song Y., Chen, W., & Liang, Z (eds.). (2023).
            a free, comparative discussion and negotiation. Therefore,   Rural Revitalization in China. A Socialist Road with Chinese
            the article offers the reader the chance to explore design   Characteristics. Singapore: Springer.
            ideas and simulations, where, despite rigorous parameters   Dong, N., Fabris, L. M. F., Wang, Y., & Chen, X. (2023). Ecosystem
            and transparent methodologies, the outcome remains    service value evaluation method for local-oriented rural
            open. Meriggi et al. (2023) propose a more decisive design-  water ecological governance: A case study on Shuiku Village
            driven approach. After proving the continued validity of   in Shanghai. Journal of Chinese Architecture and Urbanism,
            Skinner’s urban model in the urban and economic structure   5(3):1055.
            of  some territories,  the authors implemented design      https://doi.org/10.36922/jcau.1055
            concepts that fit within this model. The projects perform   Halskov, M., Li, H., & Svarverud, R. (2018). Ecological civilization:
            as punctual declinations of an abstract scheme, allowing   Interpreting the Chinese past, projecting the global future.
            the  possibility  of  discerning  its  falsifiability  and  validity   Global Environmental Change, 53: 195-203.
            while illustrating potential development scenarios. The      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.09.014
            discourse remains entirely within the design dimension as
            the framework for encapsulating and positioning within   He, W. (2021). Thinking and Making Architecture in Rural China.
            the complex negotiations of values animating countryside   London: Design Media Publishing.
            transformations.                                   Koolhaas, R. (2020). Ignored realm. In: AMO and R Koolhaas,
                                                                  (eds.). Countryside, A Report. New York: Taschen, p. 2-3.
              The strategies employed in these projects, or design-
            supporting methodologies, exemplify a multiplicity   Lee, C. C. M (ed.). (2015). Taiqian. The Countryside as a City.
            of approaches that portray the complex panorama of    Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Graduate School.
            rural  planning  and  construction  in  China.  They  blend   Li, M., Yang, M., Luo, Y., Zheng, D., & Fu, M. (2024). Study on
            technological advancements with critical heritage     the development path of cultural tourism integration in
            preservation and socioeconomic development with       Yubai Village in the context of rural revitalization. Journal of
            environmental sensibility, allowing us to apprehend rural   Chinese Architecture and Urbanism, 6(1):0953.
            China as a fertile ground for testing contemporary design      https://doi.org/10.36922/jcau.0953
            approaches on a global scale. Koolhaas (2020) describes   Li, X. (2018). Rural futures: Challenges and opportunities on
            the rural context as the “forgotten realm,” which serves as   contemporary China. Architecture China, 1: 4-11.
            a rich source of identity in today’s globalized world. The
            reshaping of rural China through policies, theories, and   Li, X. (2019). RE/DEFINE Tradition. Architecture China, 2: 4-7.
            practices appears aligned with this view and is keen to   Lin, J. (2013). The paradox of architecture. Domus, 970:56-63.


            Volume 6 Issue 3 (2024)                         5                        https://doi.org/10.36922/jcau.3370
   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16