Page 162 - JCAU-7-1
P. 162

Journal of Chinese
            Architecture and Urbanism                                      Standards for rural residential façades and areas



            and ensures esthetic harmony with existing buildings.   quantitative methods to achieve more comprehensive data
            When  combined  with  modern  construction  methods,   collection. For instance, semi-structured interviews could
            these materials enhance durability and functionality while   help gather more effective insights from older participants.
            maintaining the authentic character of rural architecture.   Another key area for future exploration lies in the
            Actively engaging local crafts workers and builders, who   preservation of traditional decorative patterns, such as
            possess expertise in these materials, should be prioritized   murals, carvings, and “kissing beasts” (animal motifs used
            in both the construction and research efforts. Such   in rooftop construction). For rural housing, determining
            collaboration not only preserves traditional artisanry but   how to adapt and present these traditional elements in
            also facilitates the incorporation of innovative solutions for   modern contexts remains a crucial challenge for designers.
            the future.
                                                               Safeguarding  these  patterns  and  crafts is  essential,
            (iii). Dynamic management mechanisms               requiring their adaptation to evolving times  to ensure
              Post-construction, rural housing should be maintained   they are showcased in ways that honor tradition while
            through dynamic management systems that continuously   enhancing their relevance and appeal in contemporary
            identify and address emerging issues. Effective rural housing   design.  Establishing  a  bottom-up  feedback  mechanism,
            management must adapt to changing environmental    grounded  in  existing  practices  and  research,  would
            conditions (such as extreme weather or climate change)   complement top-down efforts to preserve the vernacular
            as well as demographic changes (such as population   character of rural façades. Such an approach would
            aging). This adaptability may involve upgrading insulation   facilitate the targeted allocation of policies and funding,
            systems to improve energy efficiency during both summer   thereby increasing the efficiency of rural development and
            and winter, or installing accessible facilities in areas with a   preservation. Moreover, it would provide both theoretical
            high concentration of elderly residents.           and technical support for the practical study of rural living
                                                               environments.
              Establishing a feedback loop – through ongoing assessment
            of maintenance efforts and collection of resident input – ensures   Acknowledgments
            continuous optimization of the system. This iterative process   None.
            helps maintain rural homes as livable, functional spaces aligned
            with the community’s evolving needs and vision.    Funding

            5. Conclusion                                      None.
            This study offers valuable insights from a user    Conflict of interest
            perspective for landscape designers, architects, and other
            professionals, presenting fresh approaches to rural housing   The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
            and environmental improvements within the broader   Author contributions
            framework of rural revitalization. By understanding these
            user-centered aspects, rural decision-makers can better   Conceptualization: All authors
            integrate user needs into planning processes. In addition,   Formal analysis: All authors
            this research contributes to the practical discourse on rural   Investigation: All authors
            cultural landscapes, advocating for a balanced approach to   Methodology: All authors
            sustainable rural landscape planning.              Writing – original draft: Sucheng Yao
              However, the study has certain limitations:      Writing – review & editing: Kanjanee Budthimedhee
            (i).  Limited representation of elderly respondents: The   Ethics approval and consent to participate
               proportion of respondents aged 65 and older is low.
               Challenges such as literacy barriers and a reluctance   Permission to participate in the study was obtained from
               to complete paper surveys hindered the collection of   each subject verbally.
               effective data from elderly individuals during field
               visits.                                         Consent for publication
            (ii). Subjectivity in quantitative survey indexes: The survey   Not applicable.
               methodology retains an element of subjectivity, which
               may affect the reliability of results.          Availability of data
              To address these issues, future research could adopt   Data will be made available from the corresponding author
            a mixed-methods approach, integrating qualitative and   on reasonable request.


            Volume 7 Issue 1 (2025)                         14                       https://doi.org/10.36922/jcau.5719
   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167