Page 135 - JCAU-7-3
P. 135

Journal of Chinese
            Architecture and Urbanism                                        Culture & play in Xi’an’s parks: 7Cs evaluation


































            Figure 1. The location of research sites
            Source: Drawing by the authors























                                                               Figure 3. Daming palace national heritage park
            Figure 2. Tang city wall heritage park             Source: Photo by authors (2024)
            Source: Photo by authors (2025)
                                                               space evaluation studies, ensuring consistency across
            matrix, followed by a consistency check to ensure reliability.   responses. The parent-focused questionnaire (Table 3)
            This analysis confirmed that the consistency ratio was   emphasized practical aspects such as safety, functionality,
            below 0.1, meeting AHP methodological standards    and interactivity, while the expert-focused questionnaire
            (Table 2).                                         (Table 4) centered on cultural representation, design
              To further assess play space designs, separate   coherence, and innovation.
            questionnaires were developed for parents and experts,   A total of 150 parent questionnaires and 30
            each containing 21 items corresponding to the evaluation   expert questionnaires were distributed for each park.
            factors. A  five-point Likert scale was used to measure   Observational surveys were conducted in public park
            responses, where 1 =  very dissatisfied, 2 =  dissatisfied,   settings, where parents were invited to participate
            3 = neutral, 4 = satisfied, and 5 = very satisfied. This scale   voluntarily through publicly available questionnaires
            was chosen for its  clarity and widespread use  in play   placed in designated areas. No personal identifiers were


            Volume 7 Issue 3 (2025)                         4                        https://doi.org/10.36922/jcau.8296
   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140