Page 23 - JCBP-3-4
P. 23

Journal of Clinical and
            Basic Psychosomatics                                                   A review of balancing psychotherapy




            Table 4. Design of VR‑BPT‑related studies
            Types of   Sample     Study design                Methods                       Results
            disease  size
            OCD       30  VR-BPT and BPT groups were   The experimental group and the control   Both groups improved obsessive-compulsive
                          used to compare the efficacy in the   group were given psychotherapy once a   symptoms, anxiety, and depression. The
                          treatment of obsessive-compulsive   week for 8 weeks. Yale-Brown obsessive   effect of VR-BPT was more effective
                          symptoms, anxiety, depression,   compulsive scale and other scales were used  than BPT alone. The VR-BPT group also
                          social support, and interpersonal   to evaluate the efficacy.  showed significantly lower OCD scores,
                          relationships.                                        demonstrating an earlier treatment effect.
            Panic     27  VR-BPT combined with drug   The experimental group and the control   Both groups alleviated panic severity,
            disorder      therapy and BPT combined with   group received psychological treatment   anxiety, and depression symptoms. VR-BPT
                          drug therapy groups were used   twice a week for 4 weeks. Panic disorder   had a better effect on panic severity and
                          to compare the efficacy on panic   severity scale and other scales were used to   anxiety symptoms compared to BPT.
                          severity as well as on symptoms of   evaluate the efficacy.
                          panic, anxiety, and depression.
            MDD       60  VR-BPT combined with drugs and   After the collection of vital signs, blood   VR-BPT combined with drug therapy was
                          drug therapy alone groups were   samples, and body measurements, the   more effective than drug therapy alone in
                          used to verify treatment efficacy and  experimental group and the control group   improving depression levels.
                          evaluate the effect of allostatic load.  received psychological treatment twice a
                                                   week for 4 weeks. HAMD-17 was used to
                                                   evaluate the efficacy.
            Abbreviations: BPT: Balancing psychotherapy; HAMD-17: Hamilton depression scale; MDD: Major depressive disorder; OCD: Obsessive-compulsive
            disorder; VR-BPT: virtual reality-based balancing psychotherapy.

              The VR-BPT protocol typically incorporates techniques   GBPT is effective in reducing the neuroticism level of
            such as VR-based exposure therapy, music relaxation,   patients. However, there was no significant difference in
            and mindfulness meditation. Therapists make flexible   the reduction of the four-dimensional neuroticism score
            adjustments to these approaches based on individual   (p>0.05). The scale assessed four factors: Low self-worth,
            patient needs to optimize treatment outcomes. The   nervous sensitivity, emotional variability, and excessive
            integration of VR technology in BPT is an innovative   worry. The scores reflected the patients’ neuroticism levels
            development providing an interactive and immersive   on these four dimensions, with lower scores indicating
            way  for  deconstructing  and  reconstructing  personal   lower levels of neuroticism.
            experience, breaking through the limitations of previous   Gao  assessed changes in patients’ psychological
                                                                     25
            psychotherapy techniques. 4                        qualities using the perceived social support scale, simple

            3.4. Innovative efficacy mechanisms in BPT clinical   coping  style  questionnaire, and goal  pursuit  scale,
            practice                                           comparing GBPT and  GCBT interventions.  The  results
                                                               showed that there was no significant difference across all
            In addition to symptom reduction, recent clinical studies   measures between the two groups before and after the
            on GBPT have begun to explore potential underlying   intervention (p>0.05).
            therapeutic mechanisms. The findings of three such studies   While these studies adopted innovative evaluation
            relevant studies are shown in Table 5. 23-25       metrics, the effectiveness and validity of these indicators
              Wang  explored the effect of  GBPT on heart rate   in elucidating BPT’s mechanisms were not thoroughly
                   23
            variability (HRV) in patients with panic disorder. The study   addressed. For instance, neuroticism and psychological
            found no significant difference in HRV indices between the   quality assessments relied solely on self-report instruments,
            control and GBPT groups (p>0.05), suggesting that HRV is   which may introduce bias and limit interpretability. 24,25
            not a sensitive and effective indicator of therapeutic change   Furthermore, the HRV measurements lacked further
            in this context. Liu  explored the effect of GBPT on the level   validation for use as physiological indicators of
                          24
                                                                                 26
            of neuroticism among GAD patients, based on the close   psychotherapy efficacy.  Overall, these exploratory studies
            connection between GAD and neurotic personality traits.   offer valuable insights and a foundation for future research.
            After 8 weeks of intervention, the reduction of the Eysenck
            Personality questionnaire-revised short-scale-neuroticism   4. Conclusion and future perspectives
            score in the experimental group was significantly higher   Current studies continue to expand the scope of BPT
            compared to the control group (p<0.01), indicating that   application, contributing to the maturation of its theoretical


            Volume 3 Issue 4 (2025)                         17                              doi: 10.36922/jcbp.8288
   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28