Page 45 - MSAM-1-3
P. 45

Optimization of chemical admixtures for 3DCP

            Materials Science in Additive Manufacturing



            Table 4. Experimental results of CCD
             Test    Static torque   Flow resistance   Torque viscosity   Static yield   Dynamic yield   Plastic   Thixo‑tropy
             run      (N∙mm)        (N∙mm)      (N·mm/rpm)    stress (Pa)  stress (Pa)  viscosity (Pa·s)  (Pa/s)
            1          843.1         194.7         2.58        833.2        192.4         18.84        13243
            2          976.3         178.3         2.00        964.8        176.2         14.58        6263
            3           1170         233.0         3.53         1156        230.3         25.79        17081
            4          937.3         165.4         2.38        926.3        163.5         17.37        8667
            5          673.6         164.5         2.90        665.7        162.6         21.19        9898
            6          595.6         150.4         2.70        588.6        148.7         19.73        7410
            7           1057         213.9         2.08         1045        211.4         15.21        12373
            8          639.7         155.3         2.41        632.2        153.5         17.62        9222
            9           1082         215.2         3.06         1070        212.7         22.35        15099
            10         846.3         155.9         2.17        836.3        154.0         15.88        6893
            11         762.8         187.3         1.89        753.9        185.1         13.84        13124
            12         996.6         210.9         2.89        984.9        208.4         21.09        17889
            13          1099         182.4         2.64         1086        180.2         19.28        11351
            14         639.0         149.2         2.46        631.5        147.4         17.97        9233
            15         837.9         169.0         2.82        828.1        167.0         20.60        17446
            16         834.6         167.2         3.01        824.8        165.3         21.99        17256
            17         856.3         166.5         2.64        846.2        164.6         19.29        17126
            18         805.6         171.2         2.80        796.1        169.1         20.46        17296
            19         825.6         168.5         3.02        815.9        166.5         22.06        18224
            20         864.5         169.8         2.90        854.3        167.8         21.19        16585
            CCD: Central composite design

            Table 5. The ANOVA results of DoE
             Responses      Static yield stress (Pa)  Dynamic yield stress (Pa)  Plastic viscosity (Pa·s)  Thixotropy (Pa/s)
                           P‑value    F value    P‑value     F value     P‑value    F value   P‑value  F value
            Model          <10 -4     46.15       <10 -4     140.6       0.0062      5.64      <10 -4   43.18
            A              <10 -4     61.91       <10 -4     577.8       0.0043      13.46     <10 -4   106.58
            B              <10 -4     77.18       <10 -4     125.1       0.0482      5.06     0.0003    30.20
            C              <10 -4     188.8       <10 -4     179.8       0.4329     0.6678    0.0148    8.630
            AB             <10 -4     53.34       <10 -4     137.4       0.9525     0.0037    0.4358    0.6589
            AC             0.0022     16.77      0.1961      1.920       0.0162      8.34     0.0036    14.26
            BC             0.1792     2.090      0.0054      12.48       0.0036      14.29    0.4663    0.5737


              In ANOVA, P-value and F-value serve as critical   was only a 0.22% possibility that the F-value of 16.77
            parameters to evaluate the significance of the proposed   occurs because of noise. As can be seen from ANOVA
            model and individual parameters. The P-value is the   results, except for some cases in AB, AC, and BC, the
            probability of achieving the F-value. A  small P-value   P-value is generally smaller than 0.05, which implies that
            reveals that the effects of the parameters are statistically   the model used for predicting the response is statistically
            significant, while the high F-value indicates that the   significant.
            variation reported by the model is significantly larger than   Figure 7 shows the normability tests. As can be seen
                                   27]
            that inherent in the process [ . For example, the factor AC   from  Figure 7, all the points are scattering around a
            has a F-value of 16.77 and a P-value of 0.0022 associated   straight line. The result indicates that residuals followed a
            with static yield stress, and the results indicate that there   normal distribution, and static/dynamic yield stress, plastic


            Volume 1 Issue 3 (2022)                         6                      https://doi.org/10.18063/msam.v1i3.16
   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50