Page 38 - manuscript_ijb05580
P. 38

27.    Jin Z, Zhai Y, Zhou Y, et al. Regulation of mesenchymal stem cell osteogenic potential via
               microfluidic  manipulation  of  microcarrier  surface  curvature.  Chem.  Eng.  J.  2022;448.
               doi:10.1016/j.cej.2022.137739

               28.    He Q, Zhang J, Liao Y, et al. Current advances in microsphere based cell culture and tissue
               engineering. Biotechnol. Adv. Mar-Apr 2020;39:107459. doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2019.107459

               29.    Hendow EK, Iacoviello F, Casajuana Ester M, Pellet‐Many C, Day RM. Hierarchically
               Structured  Biodegradable  Microspheres  Promote  Therapeutic  Angiogenesis.  Adv.  Healthcare
               Mater. 2024;13(31). doi:10.1002/adhm.202401832

               30.    Wang Y, Kankala RK, Zhang J, et al. Modeling endothelialized hepatic tumor microtissues
               for drug screening. Adv. Sci. 2020;7(21):2002002. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202002002

               31.    Zhang  Y,  Ma  C,  Xie  J,  Ågren  H,  Zhang  H.  Black  phosphorus/polymers:  status  and
               challenges. Adv. Mater. 2021;37(33):2100113. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202100113

               32.    Bai  L,  Han  Q,  Han  Z,  et  al.  Stem  Cells  Expansion  Vector  via  Bioadhesive  Porous
               Microspheres  for  Accelerating  Articular  Cartilage  Regeneration.  Adv.  Healthcare  Mater.
               2023;13(3):2302327. doi:10.1002/adhm.202302327

               33.    Dhanabalan  KM,  Gupta  VK,  Agarwal  R.  Rapamycin–PLGA  microparticles  prevent
               senescence, sustain cartilage matrix production under stress and exhibit prolonged retention in
               mouse joints. Biomater. Sci. 2020;8(15):4308-4321. doi:10.1039/D0BM00596G

               34.    Wang  Y,  Yuan  X,  Yu  K,  et  al.  Fabrication  of  nanofibrous  microcarriers  mimicking
               extracellular matrix for functional microtissue formation and cartilage regeneration. Biomaterials.
               2018;171:118-132. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.04.033

               35.    Hu Z, Lin H, Wang Z, et al. 3D Printing Hierarchical Porous Nanofibrous Scaffold for Bone
               Regeneration. Small. 2024; 21(2):2405406. doi:10.1002/smll.202405406

               36.    Dai W, Li S, Jia H, et al. Indirect 3D printing CDHA scaffolds with hierarchical porous
               structure  to  promote  osteoinductivity  and  bone  regeneration.  Journal  of  Materials  Science  &
               Technology. 2025;207:295-307. doi:10.1016/j.jmst.2024.04.032

               37.    He  J,  Sun  Y,  Gao  Q,  et  al.  Gelatin  Methacryloyl  Hydrogel,  from  Standardization,
               Performance,  to  Biomedical  Application.  Adv.  Healthcare  Mater.  2023;12(23):2300395.
               doi:10.1002/adhm.202300395

               38.    Huang Z, Kraus VB. Does lipopolysaccharide-mediated inflammation have a role in OA?
               Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. Feb 2016;12(2):123-9. doi:10.1038/nrrheum.2015.158

               39.    Xue C, Tian J, Cui Z, et al. Reactive oxygen species (ROS)-mediated M1 macrophage-
               dependent nanomedicine remodels inflammatory microenvironment for osteoarthritis recession.
               Bioact. Mater. 2024;33:545-561. doi:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2023.10.032

               40.    Yu X, Gholipourmalekabadi M, Wang X, Yuan C, Lin K. Three‐dimensional bioprinting
               biphasic  multicellular  living  scaffold  facilitates  osteochondral  defect  regeneration.  Interdiscip.
               Mater. 2024;3(5):738-756. doi:10.1002/idm2.12181




                                                             37
   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40