Page 19 - manuscript_ijb05589
P. 19

The Ohnesorge number (Oh) is a key dimensionless parameter used to evaluate the jetting behavior

               of fluids. It encapsulates the balance between viscous, inertial, and surface tension forces, and is
               defined as Oh = μ / √(ρσd), where μ is the dynamic viscosity, ρ the fluid density, σ the surface

                                                                                              48
               tension, and d the characteristic length scale (typically the nozzle or jet diameter)  . In this work,
               the Ohnesorge number ranged from 0.021 for the lowest-viscosity ink (2.8 cP) to 1.31 for the

               highest-viscosity ink (165 cP). In accordance with our results, for Newtonian fluids, a range of

               0.01 < Oh < ~1.5 has been shown to produce stable, satellite-free droplets in laser-assisted flow-
                                 25
               focusing systems  . The Weber number (We) was also calculated to characterize the ratio of
               inertial to surface tension forces, defined as We = (ρv²d) / σ, where v is the jet velocity. The Weber
               number is useful for assessing droplet behavior upon impact, such as splashing or penetration into

               soft substrates (e.g., tissue)  49,50 . Across all tested viscosities and laser energies using the mobile

               LIST printer, the Weber number ranged from 20 to 320 - placing it well within the drop spreading
               regime and avoiding conditions associated with splashing or substrate penetration when targeting

                          51
               soft tissue  .
               Compared  to  our  previous  LIST  implementation  using  a  fixed  printing  head  with  free-space

                     28
               optics ,  the  present  mobile  fiber-based  setup  shows  a  consistently  higher  printing  threshold
               energy—by a factor of 1.5—across all tested viscosities (2.8 cP to 140 cP) with the same model
               ink. Two factors likely contribute to this difference. The primary factor is that, in the mobile fiber-

               based setup, the bubble is generated at the top part of the capillary, which is farther from the
               opening compared to the free-space optics system, where the bubble forms in the middle of the

               capillary. The second factor is the focusing lens used in the fixed setup, which produced a smaller
               spot size compared to the 105 μm fiber output, thereby yielding a higher power density at the focus

               for  the  same  deposited  energy.  Nevertheless,  both  systems  achieved  printing  over  a  similar

               viscosity range.

               One limitation of the present study is that printing experiments were conducted using a step-by-

               step movement of the robotic arm rather than continuous motion along predefined paths. This was
               necessary due to the need for continuous z-coordinate updates using input from the OCT-based

               position  tracking  system.  However,  this  operational  mode  introduced  vibrations,  which

               significantly contributed to drop placement errors. For instance, when the update frequency of the
               XYZ coordinates was reduced from 5 Hz to 2 Hz, the droplet placement error decreased from 220



                                                             18
   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24