Page 84 - AC-2-1
P. 84
Arts & Communication Nebula rasa: The diaphanous in architectural design
doi: 10.1080/00405846609542017 doi: 10.1080/17547075.2009.11643291
17. McCrae RR. Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to 35. Haarmann A. Artistic Research: Eine Epistemologische
experience. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1987;52(6):1258-1265. Ästhetik [Artistic Research: An Epistemological Aesthetic].
doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.52.6.1258 Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag; 2019.
18. McKinnon D. Identifying creativity. In: Gowan JC, Demos GD, 36. Goldschmidt G. Manual sketching: Why is it still relevant?
Torrance EP, editors. Creativity: Its Educational Implications. In: Ammon S, Capdevila-Werning R, editors. The Active
New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1967. p. 227-235. Image: Architecture and Engineering in the Age of Modeling.
Cham: Spring Switzerland Verlag; 2017. p. 82-83.
19. Harvey S, Berry JW. Toward a meta-theory of creativity
forms: How novelty and usefulness shape creativity. Acad 37. Maas R. Die diaphane struktur als bildliches and bauliches
Manage Rev. 2023;48(3):504-529. urprinzip [The diaphanous structure as visual and
constructive foundational principle]. In: Kuch U, editor. Das
doi: 10.5465/amr.2020.0110
Diaphane: Architektur und ihre Bildlichkeit [The Diaphanous:
20. Asimow M. Introduction to Design. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Architecture and its Visuality]. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag;
Prentice Hall; 1962. p. 44. 2019. p. 65-67.
21. Broadbent G. Design method in architecture. Archit J. 38. Schön D. The Reflective Practitioner. Cambridge MA: MIT
1966;144(11):679-685. Press; 1987.
22. Jones JC. Design Methods: Seeds of Human Futures. London: 39. Wittgenstein L. In: Hacker PM, Schulte J, Transl. Philosophical
Wiley; 1970. Investigations. 4 ed. London: Wiley-Blackwell; 2009. p. 204.
th
23. Lawson B. How Designers Think: The Design Process 40. Goldschmidt G. The dialectics of sketching. Creat Res J.
Demystified. 4 ed. Oxford: Elsevier; 2005. 1991;4:123-143.
th
24. Csikszentmihalyi M. Flow: The Psychology of Optimal doi: 10.1080/10400419109534381
Experience. New York: HarperCollins; 2008.
41. Palmboom F. Redrawing the map-oscillating between
25. Csikszentmihalyi M. Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of resemblance and alienation. OASE J Archit. 2020;107:35-37.
Discovery and Invention. New York: HarperCollins; 2013.
p. 101-102. 42. Frascari M. Lines as architectural thinking. Archit Theory
Rev. 2009;l14(3):200-212.
26. Bohm D. On Creativity. London: Routledge; 2004.
doi: 10.1080/13264820903341605
27. Mallgrave HF, Goodman D. An Introduction to Architectural
Theory: 1968 to the Present. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 43. Mukařovský J. Standard language and poetic language.
2011. p. 201-214. In: Chovanec J, editor. Chapters from the History of Czech
Functional Linguistics. Brno: Masarykova Univerzita;
28. Zumthor P. Architektur Denken [Thinking Architecture]. 2014. p. 44.
Basel: Birkhäuser; 2014. p. 13.
44. Paans O. Opening up towards the non-conceptual: From
29. Paans O, Pasel R. Drawing as notational thinking in Kantian judgment to creative oscillation. Contemp Stud
architectural design. In: Storni C, Leahy K, McMahon M,
Lloyd P, Bohemia E, editors. Proceedings of DRS2018. Vol. 4. Kantian Philos. 2020;5:116-131.
Limerick, Ireland; 2018. p. 1474-1485. 45. Sauter F, von Moos C. Some Fragments. Berlin: Verlag der
doi: 10.21606/drs.2018.247 Buchhandlung Walther und Franz König; 2022. p. 55.
30. Polanyi M. The Tacit Dimension. Chicago: University of 46. Jullien F. In: Richardson M, Fijalkowski K, Transl. The
Chicago Press; 2009. Philosophy of Living. London: Seagull Books; 2016. p. 49.
31. Pallasmaa J. The Thinking Hand: Existential and Embodied 47. Jullien F. In: Richardson M, Fijalkowski K, Transl. The
Wisdom in Architecture. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons; Philosophy of Living. London: Seagull Books; 2016. p. 48.
2009. p. 109-110. 48. Jullien F. In: Todd JM, Transl. The Great Image Has No Form,
32. Pallasmaa J. The Embodied Image: Imagination and Imagery or On the Nonobject Through Painting. Chicago, IL: Chicago
in Architecture. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons; 2011. University Press; 2012. p. 60.
p. 121-122. 49. Jullien F. In: Todd JM, Transl. The Great Image Has No Form,
33. Jonas W. Research for uncertainty. In: Buchert M, editor. or On the Non-object Through Painting. Chicago, IL: Chicago
Reflexives Entwerfen/Reflexive Design. Berlin: JOVIS Verlag; University Press; 2012. p. 61.
2014. p. 72-103. 50. JJullien F. In: Todd JM, Transl. The Great Image Has No
34. Yaneva A. Making the social hold: Towards an actor-network Form, or On the Nonobject through Painting. Chicago, IL:
theory of design. Des Cult. 2009;1(3):273-288. Chicago University Press; 2012. p. 69-70.
Volume 2 Issue 1 (2024) 12 https://doi.org/10.36922/ac.1922

