Page 84 - AC-2-1
P. 84

Arts & Communication                                        Nebula rasa: The diaphanous in architectural design



               doi: 10.1080/00405846609542017                     doi: 10.1080/17547075.2009.11643291
            17.  McCrae RR. Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to   35.  Haarmann  A.  Artistic Research: Eine Epistemologische
               experience. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1987;52(6):1258-1265.  Ästhetik [Artistic Research: An Epistemological Aesthetic].
               doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.52.6.1258                   Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag; 2019.
            18.  McKinnon D. Identifying creativity. In: Gowan JC, Demos GD,   36.  Goldschmidt G. Manual sketching: Why is it still relevant?
               Torrance EP, editors. Creativity: Its Educational Implications.   In: Ammon S, Capdevila-Werning R, editors.  The Active
               New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1967. p. 227-235.   Image: Architecture and Engineering in the Age of Modeling.
                                                                  Cham: Spring Switzerland Verlag; 2017. p. 82-83.
            19.  Harvey S, Berry JW. Toward a meta-theory of creativity
               forms: How novelty and usefulness shape creativity.  Acad   37.  Maas R. Die diaphane struktur als bildliches and bauliches
               Manage Rev. 2023;48(3):504-529.                    urprinzip [The diaphanous structure as visual and
                                                                  constructive foundational principle]. In: Kuch U, editor. Das
               doi: 10.5465/amr.2020.0110
                                                                  Diaphane: Architektur und ihre Bildlichkeit [The Diaphanous:
            20.  Asimow M.  Introduction to Design. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:   Architecture and its Visuality]. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag;
               Prentice Hall; 1962. p. 44.                        2019. p. 65-67.
            21.  Broadbent G. Design method in architecture.  Archit J.   38.  Schön D. The Reflective Practitioner. Cambridge MA: MIT
               1966;144(11):679-685.                              Press; 1987.
            22.  Jones JC. Design Methods: Seeds of Human Futures. London:   39.  Wittgenstein L. In: Hacker PM, Schulte J, Transl. Philosophical
               Wiley; 1970.                                       Investigations. 4  ed. London: Wiley-Blackwell; 2009. p. 204.
                                                                              th
            23.  Lawson B.  How Designers Think: The Design Process   40.  Goldschmidt G. The dialectics of sketching.  Creat Res J.
               Demystified. 4  ed. Oxford: Elsevier; 2005.        1991;4:123-143.
                         th
            24.  Csikszentmihalyi  M.  Flow: The Psychology of Optimal      doi: 10.1080/10400419109534381
               Experience. New York: HarperCollins; 2008.
                                                               41.  Palmboom F. Redrawing the map-oscillating between
            25.  Csikszentmihalyi M. Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of   resemblance and alienation. OASE J Archit. 2020;107:35-37.
               Discovery and Invention. New  York: HarperCollins; 2013.
               p. 101-102.                                     42.  Frascari M. Lines as architectural thinking.  Archit Theory
                                                                  Rev. 2009;l14(3):200-212.
            26.  Bohm D. On Creativity. London: Routledge; 2004.
                                                                  doi: 10.1080/13264820903341605
            27.  Mallgrave HF, Goodman D. An Introduction to Architectural
               Theory: 1968 to the Present.  Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell;   43.  Mukařovský  J. Standard  language  and  poetic  language.
               2011. p. 201-214.                                  In: Chovanec J, editor. Chapters from the History of Czech
                                                                  Functional Linguistics. Brno: Masarykova Univerzita;
            28.  Zumthor P.  Architektur Denken  [Thinking Architecture].   2014. p. 44.
               Basel: Birkhäuser; 2014. p. 13.
                                                               44.  Paans O. Opening up towards the non-conceptual: From
            29.  Paans O, Pasel R. Drawing as notational thinking in   Kantian judgment to creative oscillation.  Contemp  Stud
               architectural design. In: Storni C, Leahy K, McMahon M,
               Lloyd P, Bohemia E, editors. Proceedings of DRS2018. Vol. 4.   Kantian Philos. 2020;5:116-131.
               Limerick, Ireland; 2018. p. 1474-1485.          45.  Sauter F, von Moos C. Some Fragments. Berlin: Verlag der
               doi: 10.21606/drs.2018.247                         Buchhandlung Walther und Franz König; 2022. p. 55.
            30.  Polanyi M.  The  Tacit  Dimension. Chicago: University of   46.  Jullien F. In: Richardson M, Fijalkowski K, Transl.  The
               Chicago Press; 2009.                               Philosophy of Living. London: Seagull Books; 2016. p. 49.
            31.  Pallasmaa J. The Thinking Hand: Existential and Embodied   47.  Jullien F. In: Richardson M, Fijalkowski K, Transl.  The
               Wisdom in Architecture. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons;   Philosophy of Living. London: Seagull Books; 2016. p. 48.
               2009. p. 109-110.                               48.  Jullien F. In: Todd JM, Transl. The Great Image Has No Form,
            32.  Pallasmaa J. The Embodied Image: Imagination and Imagery   or On the Nonobject Through Painting. Chicago, IL: Chicago
               in Architecture. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons; 2011.   University Press; 2012. p. 60.
               p. 121-122.                                     49.  Jullien F. In: Todd JM, Transl. The Great Image Has No Form,
            33.  Jonas W. Research for uncertainty. In: Buchert M, editor.   or On the Non-object Through Painting. Chicago, IL: Chicago
               Reflexives Entwerfen/Reflexive Design. Berlin: JOVIS Verlag;   University Press; 2012. p. 61.
               2014. p. 72-103.                                50.  JJullien F. In: Todd JM, Transl.  The Great Image Has No
            34.  Yaneva A. Making the social hold: Towards an actor-network   Form, or On the Nonobject through Painting. Chicago, IL:
               theory of design. Des Cult. 2009;1(3):273-288.     Chicago University Press; 2012. p. 69-70.


            Volume 2 Issue 1 (2024)                         12                        https://doi.org/10.36922/ac.1922
   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89