Page 80 - AC-2-1
P. 80

Arts & Communication                                        Nebula rasa: The diaphanous in architectural design



            readings and stimulates thinking. As Jullien argues, new   the sketch becomes settled, losing the critical edge of its
            elements “spring up” out of the drawing. Those elements   generative power.  Its incompleteness causes its efficacy:
                                                                             48
            that “settle” are determined for the time being:      “In revealing to us the power of  incompletion  (or  by
               “[T]his fundamental fact–that the determination (any   revealing that plenitude is not completion), the sketch
               determination) grasps what is settled and not the   makes us feel the infinite richness of the indefinite, or the
               springing up; that the definition is situated downstream   fecundity of the beyond and of possibility—in short, what
               rather than upstream, in a state of flatness that is sterile   we ordinarily understand as the powers of the virtual.” 49
               and not fecund.” 46                               The “indefinite” is the operative realm of the diaphanous
              Hence, (Greek)  logos or deliberative reason can only   – the domain of (visual) suggestion and springing up as
            grasp  what  is  determined. In  cognitivist terms:  it reads   opposed to the domain of settling down and defining.
            representational content as informational contents.   Every sketch that is an “effective present” is suffused
            However, many representations are not just vehicles for   with diaphaneity. Its openness forms an integral part of
            transmitting information. By definition, information is   its visual texture. While the cognitivist paradigm viewed
            already settled – it is circumscribed and determined. Once   representations as the endpoint of a determinative process,
            it is determined a flatness enters – the suggested depth   Jullien emphasizes the fact that “availability” or space for
            disappears, and its stimulating potential fades.   development is the most effective moment in the creative
                                                                     50
              Instead, many representations in architectural design   process.  Only once a designer realizes how much can still
            processes are best understood in a generative sense.  They   be changed and accomplished and how many possibilities
                                                     47
            constitute  an  “effective  present.”  That  is,  their  presence   are still waiting to be worked out, can the creative process
            renders creative thought effective in the here and now   unfold and open up again.
            (Figure 3). Rather than transmitting informational contents,   Through diaphaneity, visual elements such as texture,
            such architectural drawings drive the development of an   border, and volume coalesce into new configurations –
            idea. Their generative characteristic is because of elements   worlds of fluidity and availability rather than fixation
            that “spring up” and that evade the determinations of logos.  and definition. In this openness, half-visible in the
              This explains why some architectural sketches have such   margin of suggestion resides its developmental potential.
            an expressive and creative appeal: their unfinishedness   The diaphanous is the opposite of definition – it is
            keeps them effective. They keep exerting tangible generative   nichtfestgelegtheit (not-being-defined) as a constitutive
            effects, allowing the designer to dwell on the ideas that they   condition. 51,52  The diaphanous opens out into new esthetic
            suggest. But the more one finishes and refines, the more   domains staging the “impossible ontological encounter”
                                                               previously mentioned. The fact that not every element is
                                                               determined, or that multiple readings are possible, creates
                                                               opportunities to revisit familiar ideas in a new setting –
                                                               making them literally strange and novel again.
                                                                 That brings us to the issue of form. What then, should be
                                                               drawn? Should we make only vague drawings that suggest
                                                               ideas rather than representations meant to develop them?
                                                               This question is justified, but also deeply cognitivist – it
                                                               wishes to return to the process of determination, as it fears
                                                               insecurity and ambiguity. As Jullien notes, the Aristotelian
                                                               tradition saw form as the end result of a developmental
                                                               process (telos). The Chinese line of thinking turns this
                                                               thought upside down. It views the sketch as a locus of
                                                               forces and vectors, rather than a depiction or illustration.
                                                               If a sketch is viewed in this manner, it follows that the dots,
                                                               lines, planes, and scribbles possess a certain propensity, or
                                                               agency of their own – indeed, that is what renders them
                                                               effective.  The sketch is no longer a neutral surface, but an
                                                                      53
                                                               in-between space of openness and architectural creation. 54
            Figure 3. Visual filtering effect of sketch paper in the diaphanous effect
            of semi-transparent paper (left of the dotted line), combined with black   The art of sketching centers around evolving from one
            lining and the original image (right of the dotted line). The play of   property of the drawing to the other – to freely navigate
            elements and suggested “depth” creates an “effective present.”  the new, diaphanous space that emerges between the


            Volume 2 Issue 1 (2024)                         8                         https://doi.org/10.36922/ac.1922
   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85