Page 108 - AC-2-3
P. 108

Arts & Communication                                                      Sublime and education in Schiller



            natural element from afar to witnessing human suffering   the Schillerian sublime coincides with the tragic. 24,25 . Since
            displaying itself directly before the spectator.  In this case,   its  inception,  Schiller’s  reworking  of Kantian  esthetics
                                                1
            the imagination must simply reflect the suffering within   of the sublime intertwines with his project of writing a
            the subject to produce a state of affective engagement. The   theory  of  tragedy,  which  Schiller  had  been  planning  to
            highest forms of Schillerian sublime, remarks Hinnant, can   carry out since before his contact with Kant’s texts (1791),
            thus be distinguished by the imaginative power to affect   prompted by the university course he taught in Jena in
            the sensibility of the subject through fear (Furcht) and   1790, for which he set out to write a never-completed essay
            compassion (Mitleid).  The involvement of affects in the   entitled Theory of Tragedy (Theorie des Trauerspiels).  As
                             20
                                                                                                         26
            sublime dynamics, however, does not represent ipso facto the   a result, in Schiller’s conception of the sublime, some of
            transition from the Kantian to the Schillerian standpoint;   the psychological categories of the 18th-century esthetics
            if only as an exception, Kant admits the participation of   on tragedy – primarily that of compassion (Mitleid), taken
            enthusiasm in the experience of the sublime, as an affect   up from Mendelssohn and Lessing 27,28  – merge with Kant’s
            sui generis mediated by the idea of good.  The shift from   transcendental esthetics.   This unique blend takes shape
                                             21
                                                                                   2
            Kant to Schiller rather consists in the function that the   precisely in Schiller’s pathetically sublime, which can thus
            latter attributes to the affective moment. Whereas in Kant   be defined as its artistic or tragic form.  In On the Pathetic
                                                                                             29
            the affect holds a merely external and conclusive position   (Über das Pathetische),  the shift from the esthetics of the
                                                                                 30
            in the esthetic phenomenon, as an accidental product of   sublime to the theory of tragedy fosters Schiller’s original
            the moral reaction, in Schiller, the affection converts into   reformulation of the Kantian esthetic phenomenon. 3
            a necessary condition for the dialectical transition from
            the sensible and cognitive dimension to the intelligible and   3. The role of imagination in On the Pathetic
            practical dimension: the “supersensible resistance” asserts   In this 1793 essay, Schiller transforms Kant’s notion of
            itself exclusively by taking control of, or more generally, by   imagination (Einbildungskraft)  from a  transcendental
            contrasting the affection. 22                      structure of knowledge into a faculty of mediation between
              In  this regard, Schiller’s  reformulation of  Kantian   the sensible and the rational spheres. This process of
            esthetics seems to further distance the sublime from the   metamorphosis, as highlighted by Ophälders and Feger, 31,32
            esthetic category of beauty. In Kant, beauty and the sublime   will  assign  to  the  faculty  of  imagination  a  political  and
            already differ in the relationship of harmony or opposition   anthropological significance in the following years,
            that reason and imagination establish within the subject. As   underlying the concept of esthetic education in both the
            far as the theory of beauty is concerned, Schiller’s esthetics   Aesthetic Education and Concerning the Sublime (Über das
                                                                       33
            reflects and develops the Kantian interpretation of the   Erhabene).  In On the Pathetic, the faculty of imagination
            harmonic relationship between the faculties of the mind   transfers the subject from the dimension of reality, in
            during the esthetic experience of beauty. In the Aesthetic   which he affectively suffers the tragic event represented
            Education, indeed, the harmonic form in which the   on stage, to the ideal dimension, where the hero’s suffering
            intelligible manifests itself in the esthetic world – the “living   converts into an object of esthetic contemplation. Within
            form” (lebende Gestalt)  – induces an equal harmonization   this imaginative space – foreshadowing the space of
                              23
            within the subject. In the writings on the sublime, on the   esthetic illusion of the Aesthetic Education, in which the
            contrary, Schiller’s introduction of affects establishes a new   real world transforms into the “world of appearance”
                                                                             34
            and more profound difference between beauty and the   (Welt des Scheins) – the subject stops regarding the tragic
            sublime, concerning the active involvement of sensibility   contradiction between the hero and his destiny in favor of
            in the esthetic experience. Nonetheless, integrating affects   the sublimity of an ideal reconciliation, although confined
            into the sublime dynamics is part of Schiller’s broader   2    For the relationship between Schiller’s theory of the sublime
            transformation of  the  Kantian  sublime,  extending  the   and his dramatic works, see P. Barone (2004),  Schiller
            sublime domain from the natural world to the artistic   und die Tradition des Erhabenen. Berlin: Schmidt Verlag,
            dimension of tragedy. I indeed agree with Petrus and Pinna   p.164–337.
            in pointing out that, as far as its pathetic form is concerned,   3    The text Über das Pathetische first appeared in September
                                                                  1793 in the magazine “Neue Thalia” (third and fourth
            1    The official English translation of Schiller’s theoretical   issues) as the second part of the essay On the Sublime (Vom
               works employs the term “pathetic” to translate the original   Erhabenen). The first section, discussed in the previous
               German  pathetisch; W. Hinderer, D.O. Dahlstrom (eds)   paragraph, was later set aside by Schiller in 1801 when
               (1993), Friedrich Schiller. Essays. New York: Continuum. In   collecting some of his aesthetic writings in a volume titled
               this context, the word means “having a capacity to move one   Kleinere prosaische Schriften von Schiller. This editorial
               to compassionate pity,” “marked by sorrow or melancholy”   choice has generally led to considering On the Pathetic as an
               (Merriam-Webster).                                 independent essay.


            Volume 2 Issue 3 (2024)                         3                                doi: 10.36922/ac.2942
   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113