Page 23 - AC-2-3
P. 23

Arts & Communication                                            Fostering civic values through short animations



            a specific year of primary education within the subject of   (iii) Soft Rain: The story is not recommended for classroom
            social sciences and citizenship education. This additional   use. Although the short animation conveys some
            task aims to strengthen comprehension and solidify the   values, it may not be suitable for children but rather
            chosen  value, thereby facilitating a practical application   intended for adult audiences.
            of the civic principles explored in the short animations.   (iv) Watermelon (2021) by Kefei Li and Connie Qin
            In essence, the aim is for participants to apply content   He: This short film does not convey civic values.
            curation  methodology  to  short  animations,  cultivating   The animation may contain content or themes that
            critical thinking while also evaluating the tool’s capacity to   are not suitable for educational settings aimed at
            instill civic values in primary school children.      instilling values in children or young audiences,
                                                                  including scenes or elements that are not age-
              Below are summaries of select short animations analyzed
            by university students as part of their classification process:  appropriate or do not align with the intended
                                                                  educational objectives.
            (i)  The  Present: This short animation portrays a
               transformative encounter between a boy and a dog,   3.2.2. Short animations with values
               emphasizing lessons of acceptance, diversity, and   The following is a list of short animations based on the
               resilience.
            (ii)  Mouse for Sale: This short animation reflects on the   positive civic values instilled:
                                                               (i)  Friendship, empathy, and gratitude (FEG):  Joy
               relevance of understanding others and how possessing   and Heron (2018) by Passion Pictures (Xina)
               complete information can cultivate empathy.        (recommended age: 5+).
            (iii) Joy and Heron: This movie explores the importance   (ii)  Resilience and others (RO): Preheated (2019) by Luke
               of complete information in fostering empathy toward   Snedecor and Sarah Heinz (recommended age: 12+).
               others.                                         (iii) Empathy and kindness (EK):  Umbrella (2021) by
            (iv)  Ropes (Cuerdas, Spanish version): This short    Helena Hilario and Mario Pece (recommended age:
               animation, which won the Goya Award for Best       12+); Windup (2022) by Yibin Jiana (recommended
               Spanish Animated Short Film in 2014, promotes      age: varies, generally 9+);  Kindness and Joy (2021)
               several civic values throughout its narrative. Viewer   (recommended age: 9+);  When Nobody’s Watching
               discretion is advised for those aged 15 and above.  (recommended age: 9+; a post-COVID-19 short
            (v)  Bridge: This short animation highlights the significance   animation that highlights the value of kindness in
               of effective communication in resolving conflicts and   everyday life);  Dear  Alice (2018) by Matt Cerini
               underscores the negative consequences of physical   (recommended age: 12+).
               and verbal violence.                            (iv)  Solidarity, compassion, inclusion, and proactivity
            (vi) Ants: This short animation provides an opportunity to   (SCPIP):  Mr. Indifferent (2018) by Aryasb Feiz
               reflect on social and civic values such as cooperation.  (recommended age: 9+); Dust Buddies (2016) by Sam

              The following subsections feature a list of short   Guade and Beth Tomashek (recommended age: 8+);
            animations along with their respective values or antivalues   Ropes (Cuerdas, Spanish version) (2019) by Pedro
            and age-based recommendations.                        Solos García (recommended age: 16+; recommended
                                                                  for future teachers);  Soar (2016) by Alice True
            3.2.1. Short animations with negative or no value     (recommended age: 7+);  Mouse for Sale (2014) by
            The following is a list of short animations with negative or   Wountor Bongaerts (recommended age: 6+).
            no values with their respective reasons:           (v)  Respect and dialogue (RD):  Bridge (2014) by Ting
            (i)  Don’t Croak (2019) by Daun Kim: This short film does not   Chian Tey (recommended age: 9+); The Present (2017)
               convey civic values, and its content is inappropriate for   by Jacob Frey (recommended age: 6+).
               the target audience, i.e., contains elements or situations   (vi) Hardworking, initiative, creativity, and critical
               that are not appropriate for the intended audience, such   thinking (HICCT):  Ant (2019) by Julia Ocker
               as violent imagery, inappropriate language, or themes   (recommended age: 5+).
               unsuitable for school-aged children.              It should be noted that the recommended ages are
            (ii)  The Bread  (2021)  by  GULU:  This  short  film  does   approximate guidelines and should only be viewed as
               not convey civic values. The animation may lack a   general suggestions. It is crucial to consider the maturity
               substantive  educational message that  encourages   level and personal circumstances of the student group
               understanding of societal norms, democratic     before viewing. In other words, while the suggested
               principles, or human rights, diminishing its potential   ages offer a starting point for individuals, any other
               as a pedagogical tool for civic education.      considerations should also be taken into account when


            Volume 2 Issue 3 (2024)                         5                                doi: 10.36922/ac.2806
   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28