Page 88 - AC-2-3
P. 88

Arts & Communication                                                      Computer vision in tactical AI art



            7.   Grba D. Lures of Engagement: An Outlook on Tactical AI   22.  Grba D. Renegade X: Poetic Contingencies in Computational
               Art. In: Verdicchio M, Carvalhais M, RIbas L, Rangel  A,   Art. In: Carvalhais M, Verdicchio M, Ribas L, Rangel A, editors.
               editors.  Proceedings of xCoAx 2022, 10   Conference on   Proceedings of xCoAx 2023, 11  Conference on Computation,
                                                                                        th
                                              th
               Computation, Communication, Aesthetics & X, Porto: i2ADS   Communication, Aesthetics & X, Porto: i2ADS Research
               Research Institute in Art, Design and Society; 2022. p. 58-74.  Institute in Art, Design and Society; 2023. p. 201-221.
               doi: 10.24840/xCoAx_2022_39                     23.  Grba D. Faux semblants: A  critical outlook on the
            8.   Marcus GF, Davis E.  Rebooting AI: Building Artificial   commercialization of digital art. MDPI Digit. 2023;3(1):67-80.
               Intelligence We Can Trust. New York, NY: Pantheon Books;      doi: 10.3390/digital3010005
               2019.
                                                               24.  Davies ER. Computer Vision: Principles, Algorithms, Applications,
            9.   Mitchell M.  Artificial Intelligence: A  Guide for Thinking   Learning. 5  ed. London, UK: Academic Press; 2018.
                                                                          th
               Humans. Kindle edition. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and
               Giroux; 2019.                                   25.  Kubovy M.  The Psychology of Perspective and Renaissance
                                                                  Art. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1988.
            10.  Larson EJ. The Myth of Artificial Intelligence: Why Computers
               Can’t Think the Way We Do. Cambridge/London, UK: The   26.  STOA (Scientific Foresight Unit). The Historical Relationship
               Belknap Press of Harvard University Press; 2021.   between Artistic Activities and Technology Development.
                                                                  European Parliamentary Research Service; 2019. Available
            11.  Pasquinelli M. How a machine learns and fails-a grammar of   from:  https://www.europarl.europa.eu/regdata/etudes/
               error for artificial intelligence. Spheres J Digit Cult. 2019;5:1-17.  idan/2019/634439/eprs_ida(2019)634439_en.pdf  [Last
            12.  Kearns M,  Roth A.  The Ethical Algorithm: The Science of   accessed on 2024 Apr 05].
               Socially Aware Algorithm Design. Oxford, UK: Oxford   27.  Witcombe CLCE.  Art  History  and  Technology:  A  Brief
               University Press; 2019.                            History. Christopher L.C.E. Witcombe’s Website; n.d. Available
            13.  Christian B. The Alignment Problem: Machine Learning and   from: https://arthistoryresources.net/arth-technology/arth-
               Human Values. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company,   technology1.html [Last accessed on 2024 Apr 05].
               Inc.; 2020.                                     28.  Surveillance Art; 2023. Available from: https://en.wikipedia.
            14.  Crawford K. Atlas of AI: Power, Politics, and the Planetary   org/wiki/surveillance_art [Last accessed on 2024 Apr 05].
               Costs of Artificial Intelligence. New Haven, CT, London, UK:   29.  Foucault M. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison.
               Yale University Press; 2021.                       New York, NY: Vintage Books; 1995.
            15.  Natale S. Deceitful Media: Artificial Intelligence and Social   30.  Levin TY, Frohne U, Weibel P. CTRL [SPACE], Rhetorics of
               Life After the Turing Test. New York, NY: Oxford University   Surveillance from  Bentham to Big  Brother. Karlsruhe, DE:
               Press; 2021.                                       ZKM/Cambridge, UK: The MIT Press; 2002.
            16.  Joler V, Pasquinelli M. The Nooscope Manifested: Artificial   31.  Remes O, Skelton P, editors.  Conspiracy Dwellings:
               Intelligence as Instrument of Knowledge Extractivism. Project   Surveillance in Contemporary Art. Newcastle upon Tyne,
               Website; 2021. Available from: https://nooscope.ai [Last   UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing; 2010.
               accessed on 2024 Apr 05].
                                                               32.  Harding JM.  Performance,  Transparency,  and  the  Cultures  of
            17.  Roberge J, Castelle M, editors. The Cultural Life of Machine   Surveillance. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press; 2018.
               Learning: An Incursion into Critical AI Studies. London, UK:
               Palgrave Macmillan/Springer Nature; 2021.       33.  Krueger  M.  Videoplace. Weebly Website;  1975.  Available
                                                                  from: https://aboutmyronkrueger.weebly.com/videoplace.
            18.  Raley R, Rhee J, editors. Critical AI: A field in formation. Am   html [Last accessed on 2024 Apr 05].
               Lit J. 2023;95(2): 185-204.
                                                               34.  Bureau of Inverse Technology. Suicide Box. Bureau of Inverse
               doi: 10.1215/00029831-10575021                     Technology Website; 1996. Available from: https://www.
            19.  Żylińska J.  AI Art: Machine Visions and Warped Dreams.   bureauit.org/sbox [Last accessed on 2024 Apr 05].
               London, UK: Open Humanities Press; 2020.        35.  Shachtman N. Tech and Art Mix at RNC Protest. Wired News; 2004.
            20.  Zeilinger M. Tactical Entanglements: AI Art, Creative Agency,   Available from: https://archive.ph/4LQi#selection-809.8-817.348
               and the Limits of Intellectual Property. Lüneburg, DE: Meson   [Last accessed on 2024 Apr 05].
               Press; 2021.                                    36.  Levin G, Baltus G.  Opto-Isolator. Golan Levin’s Website
            21.  Grba D. Brittle Opacity: Ambiguities of the Creative AI. In:   Archive; 2007. Available from: https://www.flong.com/
               Verdicchio M, Carvalhais M, Ribas L, Rangel A, editors.   archive/projects/optoisolator/index.html [Last accessed on
               Proceedings of xCoAx 2021, 9  Conference on Computation,   2024 Apr 05].
                                     th
               Communication, Aesthetics & X, Porto: i2ADS Research   37.  YCAM.  Seiko  Mikami:  Desire  of  Codes. YCAM InterLab
               Institute in Art, Design and Society; 2021. p. 235-260.
                                                                  Website; 2010. Available from: https://special.ycam.jp/
               doi: 10.5281/zenodo.5831884                        interlab/en/develop/2010/desire-of-codes.html  [Last

            Volume 2 Issue 3 (2024)                         15                               doi: 10.36922/ac.2282
   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93