Page 17 - AC-3-2

Arts & Communication Augmented reality in mathematics education

Consent for publication doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.002

Not applicable. 11. Budinski N, Lavicza Z. Teaching Advanced Mathematical
Concepts with Origami and GeoGebra Augmented Reality.
Availability of data Available from: https://www.geogebra.com [Last accessed
on 2024 Nov 18].
Not applicable.
12. Gunčaga J, Budai L, Kenderessy T. Visualisation in geometry
References education as a tool for teaching with better understanding.
Teach Math Computer Sci. 2020;18(4):337-346.
1. Vuță DR. Augmented reality technologies in education - A
Literature review. Bull Transilvania Univ Brasov Ser V Econ doi: 10.5485/tmcs.2020.0499
Sci. 2020;13(62):35-46. 13. Kim SJS, Sanchez A, Hanifzai JF, Palispis F, Nishimura K.
The OTC (Object to Camera) Approach to Visualize Behind
doi: 10.31926/but.es.2020.13.62.2.4
Stories of Museum Exhibits. In: Lecture Notes in Computer
2. Cangas D, Morga G, Rodríguez JL. Geometry teaching Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial
experience in virtual reality with NeoTrie VR Geometry Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics). Vol. 11786
teaching experience with NeoTrie VR. Psychology. LNCS. Germany: Springer Verlag; 2019. p. 243-252.
2019;11(3):355-366.
doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-30033-3_19
doi: 10.25115/psye.v10i1.2270
14. Koutromanos G, Sofos A, Avraamidou L. The use of
3. Rodríguez JL, Romero I, Codina A. The influence of neotrie augmented reality games in education: A review of the
vr’s immersive virtual reality on the teaching and learning of literature. EMI Educ Media Int. 2015;52(4):253-271.
geometry. Mathematics. 2021;9(19):2411. doi: 10.1080/09523987.2015.1125988
doi: 10.3390/math9192411
15. Dana-Picard T, Hershkovitz S. Geometrical features of
4. Wu HK, Lee SW, Chang HY, Liang JC. Current status, a Jewish monument: Study with a DGS. J Math Arts.
opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in 2019;13(1-2):60-71.
education. Comput Educ. 2013;62:41-49. doi: 10.1080/17513472.2018.1552067
doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.024 16. Jesionkowska J, Wild F, Deval Y. Active learning augmented

5. Azuma RT. Drascic, 1993; Feiner, 1994a, b; Milgram Etal.; reality for steam education-a case study. Educ Sci (Basel).
1995. Available from: https://www.cs.unc.edu/~azuma [Last 2020;10(8):1-15.
accessed on 2024 Nov 18]. doi: 10.3390/educsci10080198

6. Kesim M, Ozarslan Y. Augmented reality in education: 17. Altinpulluk H. Determining the trends of using augmented
Current technologies and the potential for education. Proc reality in education between 2006-2016. Educ Inf Technol
Soc Behav Sci. 2012;47:297-302. (Dordr). 2019;24(2):1089-1114.
doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.654 doi: 10.1007/s10639-018-9806-3
7. Milgram P, Takemura H, Utsumi A, Kishino F. Augmented 18. Botana F, Kovács Z, Recio T. Automatically Augmented
reality: A class of displays on the reality-virtuality Reality for Outdoor Mathematics. In: Research on Outdoor
continuum. In: Proc. SPIE 2351, Telemanipulator and STEM Education in the Digital Age. Proceedings of the
Telepresence Technologies. 1995. p. 282-292. ROSETA Online Conference in June 2020. Münster: WTM-
doi: 10.1117/12.197321 Verlag; 2020. p. 71-78.
8. Tzima S, Styliaras G, Bassounas A. Augmented reality doi: 10.37626/ga9783959871440.0.09
applications in education: Teachers point of view. Educ Sci 19. Li S, Shen Y, Jiao X, Cai S. Using augmented reality to
(Basel). 2019;9(2):99. enhance students’ representational fluency: The case of
doi: 10.3390/educsci9020099 linear functions. Mathematics. 2022;10:1718.
9. Ahmad NI, Junaini SN. Augmented reality for learning doi: 10.3390/math10101718
mathematics: A systematic literature review. Int J Emerg 20. Elsayed SA, Al-Najrani HI. Effectiveness of the augmented
Technol Learn. 2020;15(16):106-122. reality on improving the visual thinking in mathematics and
academic motivation for middle school students. Eurasia J
doi: 10.3991/ijet.v15i16.14961
Math Sci Technol Educ. 2021;17(8):em1991.
10. Ibáñez MB, Delgado-Kloos C. Augmented reality for
STEM learning: A systematic review. Comput Educ. doi: 10.29333/ejmste/11069
2018;123:109-123. 21. Alibraheim EA, Hassan HF, Soliman MW. Efficacy of

Volume 3 Issue 2 (2025) 11 doi: 10.36922/ac.4446