Page 127 - AC-3-3
P. 127

Arts & Communication                                               Emotional experience of listening to music




            Table 1. Participants’ gender demographics           The Mann–Whitney U-test, and the Kruskal–Wallis test
                                                               were used to test the hypotheses, owing to the disturbed
            Variable                     Students (n=134)      normality of the data distribution. The data were processed
                                    f                  %       using the computer program SPSS.
            Sex
             Men                    61                 45.5    3. Results
             Women                  73                 54.5    Tables  4-11 show the students’  familiarity with  the
             Total                  134                100     compositions and their expressed emotions. One-third
            Abbreviation: f: Number of students.               students (33.6%) were familiar piece no. 1. As anticipated,
                                                               with its slow tempo, quiet dynamics, crescendos, and
            Table 2. Participants’ grade and school levels     major key, this composition evoked calm in most students
                                                               (87.3%) at a medium intensity. One student (0.8%) felt
            Variable            Grade            Students      anger/anxiety (Table 4).
                                                  (n=134)
                                                 f     %         Piece 2 evoked a high intensity of happy emotions in
            Grade,     First grade of primary school  19  14.2  almost all students (98.5%), which was expected due to its
            school level  Second grade of primary school  22  16.4  fast tempo, loud dynamics, and major key. It did not evoke
                                                               feelings of sadness or calm in any student. Almost half the
                       Third grade of primary school  23  17.2  students (48.5%) knew the composition (Table 5).
                       Fourth grade of primary school  11  8.2   Piece 3 was familiar to 29.1% of the students. This piece
                       Fifth grade of primary school  7  5.2   evoked a medium intensity of anger/anxiety in 74.6%
                       Sixth grade of primary school  19  14.2  of the students, which was expected because of given its
                       First grade of secondary school  11  8.2  fast tempo, dissonant harmonies, and notable changes
                       Second grade of secondary school  13  9.7  in dynamics. Approximately one-sixth of the students
                       Third grade of secondary school  9  6.7  (16.4%) felt happiness, which may have been because of
                       Total                    134    100     the fast tempo. Surprisingly, 8.2% felt calm (Table 6).
                                                                 Only 23.9% of the students knew piece 4. Around
            Table 3. Musical pieces and expected emotions      two-thirds of students (63.4%) experienced the expected
                                                               sadness due to the sample’s slow tempo, quiet dynamics,
            No.           Composer, piece        Expected      and minor key; however, the intensity of this emotion was
                                                  emotion      weak. The tempo and dynamics also evoked weak feelings
            1.   W. A. Mozart: Clarinet Concerto in A‑major K  Calmness  of calmness in 35.1% of the students (Table 7).
                    nd
                 622 (2  movement – Adagio)
            2.   Big Bad Voodoo Daddy: Big Time Operator  Happiness  Musical piece five was familiar to only 30.6% of
            3.   I. Stravinski: Infernal Dance of King Kaschei,   Anger/anxiety  students. The emotional results were unsurprising, evoking
                 2  act from The Firebird                      anger/anxiety at the medium intensity in 76.9% of the
                 nd
            4.   T Albinoni: Adagio for Strings and Organ in   Sadness  students, potentially because it has a fast tempo, dissonant
                 g‑minor                                       harmonies, and considerable changes in dynamics.
            5.   M. P. Musorgski: Pictures at an Exhibition   Anger/anxiety  Approximately one-fifth of students (18.7%) experienced
                 (orch. Ravel): IX. The Hut on Fowl’s Legs     happiness, potentially due to the fast tempo (Table 8).
                 “Baba-Yaga”                                     Nearly half the students (41%) stated they were familiar
            6.   R Schumann: Träumerei from Kinderszenen  Calmness  with piece 6. As expected, 70.1% of the students reported
            7.   S Barber: Adagio for Strings, op. 11  Sadness  that the composition evoked calmness, which was at a
            8.   A Dvořák: String Quartet in F‑major (2    Happiness  medium intensity and likely due to its slow tempo, quiet
                                         nd
                 movement – Finale – Vivace ma non-troppo)     dynamics, crescendos, and major key. Notably, 23.9% of
                                                               the students reported that the slow tempo evoked sadness
            Excerpts predicted to elicit the emotion of calmness were
            in a major key, had a slow tempo and quiet dynamics, and   (Table 9).
            featured gradual transitions to loud dynamics. Excepts   Musical piece 7, with its slow tempo, quiet dynamics, and
            expected to elicit happiness were in a major key and had   minor key, evoked sadness in most students (60.4%), but at
            a fast tempo and loud dynamics. Excerpts expected to   a weak intensity. The slow tempo also evoked calmness in
            elicit  anger  and  anxiety  were  fast-paced,  with  dissonant   36.6% of the students. Only 23 students (17.2%) said they
            harmonies and many sudden changes in their dynamics.  had previously heard the composition (Table 10).

            Volume 3 Issue 3 (2025)                         4                                doi: 10.36922/ac.6009
   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132