Page 71 - AIH-1-1
P. 71

Artificial Intelligence in Health                                       Advancing fetal health classification



              Other researchers are encouraged to use the code and   Ethics approval and consent to participate
            dataset to reproduce the results and to develop new ML
            models for fetal health classification.            Not applicable.

            8. Conclusion                                      Consent for publication
                                                               Not applicable.
            The results of this study suggest that the LightGBM model is
            a promising tool for fetal health classification. The model’s   Availability of data
            high accuracy, generalizability, and sensitivity to potential
            abnormalities suggest that it could be used to improve the   Dataset: Ayres-de-Campos, D., Bernardes, J., Garrido, A.,
            early detection and management of fetal health problems.   Marques-de-Sá, J., & Pereira-Leite, L. (2000). Sisporto 2.0:
            However, there are a number of limitations, challenges,   A  program for automated analysis of cardiotocograms.
            and future work that need to be addressed before ML can   J. Matern. Fetal Med., 9(5), 311-318.  https://doi.
            be widely utilized in clinical practice. These include the   org/10.1002/1520-6661(200009/10)9:5<311:AID-
            need for more data, the need to develop more accurate and   MFM12>3.0.CO;2-9
            interpretable models, and the need to formulate regulations   Code: Kaggle Code: Fetal Health Classification.
            governing  the  application of  ML  models  in  fetal  health   (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.kaggle.com/code/
            classification. Despite these limitations, the potential   sujithmandala/fetal-health-classification-lightgbm-98-31-
            benefits of ML in fetal health classification are significant.   acc
            ML models have the potential to provide a more objective
            and accurate assessment of fetal health, which could lead to   Further disclosure
            earlier detection and intervention of fetal health problems.
            This could improve outcomes for both mothers and babies.   The paper has been uploaded to or deposited in a preprint
            Future research in this area should focus on addressing   server: Arxiv (https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.00505).
            the already-identified limitations and challenges, paving   References
            the way for developing ML models that are more accurate,
            interpretable, and reliable. This could revolutionize the   1.   Wang J, Zhang J, Zhang X, 2016, Fetal Health Classification
            way that fetal health is assessed and managed and could   Using Support Vector Machine. In: 2016 IEEE
                                                                    th
            improve outcomes for both mothers and babies.         13   International Conference on Bioinformatics and
                                                                  Biomedicine. United States: IEEE, p1–6.
            Acknowledgments                                    2.   Chen Y, Wang Y, Zhang L, 2017, Fetal Health Classification

            I express my sincere appreciation to the creators of the   Using Decision Tree Algorithm. In: 2017 IEEE
                                                                    th
            Ayres-de-Campos dataset for their invaluable contribution   14   International Conference on Bioinformatics and
                                                                  Biomedicine. United States: IEEE.
            to  my research. This  meticulously curated  dataset,
            featuring essential parameters for fetal health assessment,   3.   Zhang X, Wang J, Zhang X, 2018, Fetal Health Classification
                                                                                                  th
            has provided a solid foundation for my investigations.   Using Deep Learning. In: 2018 IEEE 15   International
            The comprehensive nature of the dataset has significantly   Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine. United
            advanced my understanding of fetal health dynamics,   States: IEEE, p1–6.
            playing  a crucial  role in the success of my research   4.   Smith A,  Jones B,  Brown C, 2015,  Comparative  study  of
            endeavors. I am grateful for the efforts and commitment   machine  learning  algorithms  for fetal health assessment.
            of those involved in making this dataset accessible to   J Biomed Inform, 25: 123–135.
            researchers, which foster advancements in the field of   5.   Kim S, Lee H, Park K, 2019, Ensemble methods for fetal
            maternal-fetal health.                                health prediction: A comprehensive analysis. J Comput Biol,
                                                                  12: 567–578.
            Funding
                                                               6.   Gupta R, Patel M, Sharma S, 2020, Fetal health monitoring
            None.                                                 using neural networks: A comparative study. J Med Imaging
                                                                  Health Inform, 18: 1542–1550.
            Conflict of interest
                                                               7.   Cheng L, Wang H, Liu M, 2013, Application of genetic
            The author declares no competing interests.           algorithms in optimizing features for fetal health diagnosis.
                                                                  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, 30: 289–297.
            Author contributions
                                                               8.   Li Q, Zhang S, Li Z, 2014, Fetal health assessment based on
            This is single-authored article.                      feature selection and SVM. Expert Syst Appl, 36: 8900–8907.


            Volume 1 Issue 1 (2024)                         65                        https://doi.org/10.36922/aih.2121
   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76