Page 125 - AIH-2-1

Artificial Intelligence in Health Does improving diagnostic accuracy increase AI adoption?

Funding intelligence and the European Union AI act: On the
conflation of trustworthiness and acceptability of risk. Regul
The project leading to this publication has received funding Gov. 2024;18(1):3-32.
from the French government under the “France 2030” doi: 10.1111/rego.12512
investment plan managed by the French National Research
Agency (reference: ANR-17-EURE-0020) and from 4. Choung H, David P, Ross A. Trust in AI and its role in the
Excellence Initiative of Aix-Marseille University – A*MIDEX. acceptance of AI technologies. Int J Hum Comput Interact.
This research also received support from the French National 2023;39(9):1727-1739.
Research Agency (GRANT ANR-20-COVR-00 and ANR- doi: 10.1080/10447318.2022.2050543
21-JPW2-002), as well as funding from the National Institute 5. Nadarzynski T, Miles O, Cowie A, Ridge D. Acceptability
of Health T32 grant (5T32MD015070-05). of artificial intelligence (AI)-led chatbot services in
Conflict of interest healthcare: A mixed-methods study. Digit Health.
2019;5:2055207619871808.
The authors declare they have no competing interests. doi: 10.1177/205520761987180
Author contributions 6. Esmaeilzadeh P. Use of AI-based tools for healthcare
purposes: A survey study from consumers’ perspectives.
Conceptualization: All authors BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020;20:1-19.
Formal analysis: Bruno Ventelou, Yulin Hswen, Ismaël doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01191-1
Rafaï, Antoine Lacombe
Investigation: Bruno Ventelou, Yulin Hswen, Ismaël Rafaï, 7. Floruss J, Vahlpahl N. Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare:
Antoine Lacombe Acceptance of AI-based Support Systems by Healthcare
Methodology: Thierry Blayac, Dimitri Dubois, Yulin Hswen, Professionals. Jönköping University. Master Thesis; 2020.
Ismael Rafai, Bruno Ventelou, Antoine Lacombe Available from: https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/
Writing–original draft: Bruno Ventelou, Yulin Hswen diva2:1433298/fulltext01.pdf [Last accessed on 2024 Oct 11].
Writing–review & editing: Ismaël Rafaï, Antoine Lacombe 8. Lambert SI, Madi M, Sopka S, et al. An integrative review
on the acceptance of artificial intelligence among healthcare
Ethics approval and consent to participate professionals in hospitals. NPJ Digit Med. 2023;6(1):111.
The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the doi: 10.1038/s41746-023-00874-z
Ethics Committee of Aix-Marseille University (approval 9. De Bekker‐Grob EW, Ryan M, Gerard K. Discrete choice
number: 2022-10-20-009). Written consent was obtained experiments in health economics: A review of the literature.
from each of the subjects to participate in this study. Health Econ. 2012;21(2):145-172.
Consent for publication doi: 10.1002/hec.1697
10. Szinay D, Cameron R, Naughton F, Whitty JA, Brown J,
Written consent was obtained from each of the subjects to Jones A. Understanding uptake of digital health products:
publish their data and/or images. Methodology tutorial for a discrete choice experiment
using the bayesian efficient design. J Med Internet Res.
Availability of data 2021;23(10):e32365.
Data used in the study can be obtained from the doi: 10.2196/32365
corresponding author upon reasonable request. 11. Clark MD, Determann D, Petrou S, Moro D,
References De Bekker-Grob EW. Discrete choice experiments in health
economics: A review of the literature. Pharmacoeconomics.
1. Reyna MA, Nsoesie EO, Clifford GD. Rethinking algorithm 2014;32:883-902.
performance metrics for artificial intelligence in diagnostic doi: 10.1007/s40273-014-0170-x
medicine. JAMA. 2022;328(4):329-330.
12. Alawode DO, Heslegrave AJ, Ashton NJ, et al. Transitioning
doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.10561
from cerebrospinal fluid to blood tests to facilitate diagnosis
2. Aggarwal R, Sounderajah V, Martin G, et al. Diagnostic and disease monitoring in Alzheimer’s disease. J Int Med.
accuracy of deep learning in medical imaging: A systematic 2021;290(3):583-601.
review and meta-analysis. NPJ Digit Med. 2021;4(1):65.
doi: 10.1111/joim.13332
doi: 10.1038/s41746-021-00438-z
13. Greenwood PE, Nikulin MS. A Guide to Chi-squared Testing.
3. Laux J, Wachter S, Mittelstadt B. Trustworthy artificial Vol. 280. United States: John Wiley and Sons; 1996.

Volume 2 Issue 1 (2025) 119 doi: 10.36922/aih.3561