Page 26 - AJWEP-22-6
P. 26

Syromiatnykov

                   for the soybean crop. AMB Express. 2021;11(1):71.    editors.  Plant Microbe Interactions in  Agro-Ecological
                   doi: 10.1186/s13568-021-01230-8                      Perspectives. Singapore: Springer; 2017. p. 81-128.
                69.  Alves  LA,  Ambrosini  VG,  de  Oliveira  Denardin  LG,      doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-5343-6_4
                   et al. Biological N₂ fixation by soybeans grown with or   80.  Jaiswal  SK,  Dakora  FD.  Maximizing  photosynthesis
                   without liming on acid soils in a no-till integrated crop-  and  plant  growth  in  African  legumes  through
                   livestock system. Soil Tillage Res. 2021;209:104923.  rhizobial  partnerships:  The  road  behind  and  ahead.
                   doi: 10.1016/j.still.2020.104923                     Microorganisms. 2025;13(3):581.
                70.  Syromyatnikov  YN,  Orekhovskaya AA,  Dzjasheev A,      doi: 10.3390/microorganisms13030581
                   et  al. Improving stability  of movement  of machine   81.  Syromyatnikov  Y, Voinash  S, Troyanovskaya  I,
                   section for soil preparation and seeding. J Phys Conf Ser.   Zagidullin  R,  Tikhonov E, Orekhovskaya  A. Chisel
                   2021;2094(4):042027.                                 tillage  under  spring  barley  in  the  forest-steppe.  Acta
                   doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/2094/4/042027                 Technol Agric. 2024;27(1):30-34.
                71.  Zotikov   VI,   Zubareva   KY.   Application   of      doi: 10.2478/ata-2024-0005
                   microbiological  preparations  in the cultivation  of   82.  Aasfar A, Bargaz A, Yaakoubi K, et al. Nitrogen fixing
                   promising soybean varieties in Oryol Oblast. Russ Agric   Azotobacter species as potential soil biological enhancers
                   Sci. 2024;50:473-480.                                for crop nutrition and yield  stability.  Front Microbiol.
                   doi: 10.3103/S1068367424700496                       2021;12:628379.
                72.  Mazur O, Tymoshchuk T, Didur I, Tsyhanskyi V. Study of      doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.628379
                   legume rhizobia symbiosis in soybean for agroecosystem   83.  Hindersah  R, Aini  RAP,  Setiawati  M,  et  al.  Boosting
                   resilience. Sci Horizons. 2024;11:68.                strawberry  yield  and  fruit  sweetness  with  humic
                   doi: 10.48077/scihor11.2024.68                       substances  and  biofertilizer  in  soilless  cocopeat-based
                73.  Didora  V,  Kluchevych  M.  Soybean  productivity   culture. J Ilm Pertanian. 2023;20(3):13242.
                   depending on the elements of organic cultivation      doi: 10.31849/jip.v20i3.13242
                   technology in the short term crop rotation of Ukrainian   84.  De Hita D, Fuentes M, Zamarreño Á, García-Mina JM,
                   Polissia. Sci Horizons. 2021;24(2):77-83.            Baigorri  R.  Culturable  bacterial  endophytes  from
                   doi: 10.48077/scihor.24(2).2021.77-83                sedimentary humic acid treated plants. Front Plant Sci.
                74.  Zimmer S, Messmer M, Haase T, et al. Effects of soybean   2020;11:837.
                   variety and  Bradyrhizobium strains on yield, protein      doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00837
                   content and biological nitrogen fixation under cool growing   85.  Dauletbay A, Hanzheng D, Ongalbek AN, et al. Humic
                   conditions in Germany. Eur J Agron. 2016;72:38-46.   acids:  Properties, structure,  and application.  Bull
                   doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2015.09.008                       Shakarim Univ Tech Sci. 2024;3:41.
                75.  Ghadge  J,  Murumkar  D.  Inoculation  effect  of      doi: 10.53360/2788-7995-2024-3(15)-41
                   consortium of Rhizobium, PSB and KMB on the growth   86.  Kong B, Wu Q, Li Y, et al. The application of humic
                   and yield of soybean.  Int J Curr Microbiol  Appl Sci.   acid  urea  improves  nitrogen  use  efficiency  and  crop
                   2020;9(9):1979-1993.                                 yield by reducing the nitrogen loss compared with urea.
                   doi: 10.20546/ijcmas.2020.909.248                    Agriculture. 2022;12(12):1996.
                76.  Gomes  Y,  Dalchiavon  F,  Valadão  F.  Joint  use  of      doi: 10.3390/agriculture12121996
                   fungicides, insecticides and inoculants in the treatment   87.  Didora  V,  Bondar  O,  Vlasiuk  M.  Soybeans
                   of soybean seeds. Rev Ceres. 2017;64:258-265.        productivity  depending  on biological  preparations  and
                   doi: 10.1590/0034-737X201764030006                   mineral  fertilizers  on  Ukraine’s  Polissia.  Sci Horiz.
                77.  Canellas LP, Silva RM, Barbosa LJS, et al. Co-inoculation   2019;22(1):33-39.
                   with Bradyrhizobium and humic substances combined with      doi: 10.332491/2663-2144-2019-74-1-33-39
                   Herbaspirillum seropedicae promotes soybean vegetative   88.  Kadoglidou KI, Anthimidou E, Krommydas K, et al. Effect
                   growth and nodulation. Agronomy. 2023;13(10):2660.   of  biostimulants  on drought  tolerance  of greenhouse-
                   doi: 10.3390/agronomy13102660                        grown tomato. Horticulturae. 2025;11(6):601.
                78.  Pratiwi  GR,  Nurrahma  AHI.  Biochar  and  humic      doi: 10.3390/horticulturae11060601
                   substances roles for nitrogen  transformation  in   89.  Pačuta  V,  Rašovský  M,  Michalska-Klimczak  B,
                   agriculture. J Tek Pert Lampung. 2024;13(4):1442-1452.  Wyszyňski Z. Grain yield and quality traits of durum wheat
                   doi: 10.23960/jtep-l.v13i4.1442-1452                 (Triticum durum Desf.) treated with seaweed- and humic
                79.  Saha B, Saha S, Das A, et al. Biological nitrogen fixation   acid-based biostimulants. Agronomy. 2021;11(7):1270.
                   for sustainable agriculture. In: Singh D, Singh H, Prabha R,      doi: 10.3390/agronomy11071270









                Volume 22 Issue 6 (2025)                        20                           doi: 10.36922/AJWEP025230190
   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31