Page 117 - {PDF Title}
P. 117

Groundwater quality assessment in Borana

                of 69.01. Based on the calculated WQI values (Table 6),   HCO₃⁻ (r = 0.666), EC (r = 0.976), TDS (r = 0.976),
                the  groundwater  sources  investigated  were  classified   K⁺ (r = 0.892), Mg²⁺ (r = 0.912), Ca²⁺ (r = 0.962), SO₄²⁻
                into three categories for drinking purposes: “Excellent”,   (r = 0.963), and  WQI (r = 0.975).  These correlations
                “Good”, and “Poor”. Accordingly, 20% of the Dubuluk   indicate the mineralization of the investigated water
                (D1 and D2) groundwater samples were rated as “Poor”   samples.  The results were also consistent with the
                quality for intended human consumption. On the contrary,   findings  of  Adamou  et al.  Strong correlations were
                                                                                            16
                30% of the Yabello (Y1, Y2, and Y4) sampling sites were   observed  between  Mg²⁺  (r  =  0.912),  Ca²⁺  (r = 0.962),
                found to have “Good” water quality. Conversely, 50%   and SO₄²⁻ (r = 0.963), suggesting that the water samples
                of the water samples collected from the present study,   exhibit permanent hardness, likely caused by the presence
                namely, those fetched from Yabello (Y3), Elewaye (E1   of magnesium and calcium sulfates.  The  WQI of the
                and E2), and Surupa (S1 and S2), exhibited “Excellent”   water samples exhibited significant positive correlations
                water quality for human consumption. Notably, none of   with  several  parameters,  including  NO₃⁻  (r  =  0.651),
                the water samples analyzed in this study were classified   EC (r = 0.972), TDS (r = 0.972), K⁺ (r = 0.865), Mg²⁺
                as “Very poor” or “Unsuitable for drinking” based on   (r = 0.8502), Ca²⁺ (r = 0.964), TH (r = 0.975), and SO₄²⁻
                the  WQI values. In a related study conducted in the   (r = 0.981), indicating their influence on overall water
                Kombolcha town area of Ethiopia by Berhe,  the WQI   quality.
                                                       12
                values for groundwater samples ranged from 23.47 to
                81.22, with an average of 42.14. Based on these values,   4. Conclusion
                the groundwater was categorized into two groups:
                excellent water and good water for drinking. In addition,   This study aimed  to assess groundwater quality  for
                findings by Mengstie et al.  indicated that WQI analysis   drinking using indices  such as GPI, NPI, and  WQI.
                                       43
                classified the water samples from the source, reservoir,   All groundwater samples analyzed exhibited turbidity,
                and taps in Hawassa town, Ethiopia, as being of good   pH,  HCO₃⁻,  NO₂⁻,  and  Cu²⁺  concentrations  within  or
                quality for drinking purposes.                      below the threshold values set by the WHO. However,
                                                                    some parameters exceeded  the recommended  limits.
                3.5. Correlation coefficient matrix analysis        All groundwater sources investigated were classified as
                As reported by Sanad et al.,  a correlation coefficient (r)   hard water.
                                        13
                close to +1 or −1 indicates a strong positive or negative   The GPI values ranged from 0.190 to 1.44, with the
                correlation, respectively, between two variables.   majority (80%) of the ground drinking water sources
                  The  results  of  the  Pearson  correlation  matrix  (r),   categorized  as  “Insignificant  pollution”  (GPI  <  1),
                obtained  from  the  statistical  analysis  of  20  selected   indicating their suitability for human consumption. In
                variables,  are  presented  in  Table  7,  with  bolded   contrast, 20% of the sources were classified as having
                coefficients indicating very strong correlations.   “Low pollution” (1 < GPI < 1.5). The NPI values ranged
                  In this study, the water temperature  showed a    from  −0.89  to  4.04,  with  50%  of  the  groundwater
                significant positive correlation only with K⁺ (r = 0.699).   drinking  source  classified  as  “Clean  (unpolluted)”.
                Meanwhile,  turbidity  exhibited  a  significant  positive   Three  sources  (30%)  were  classified  as  experiencing
                correlation only with total Fe (r = 0.766). In addition,   “Moderate  pollution”.  The  D2  groundwater  drinking
                TDS and EC demonstrated a perfect positive correlation   source  was  categorized  as  “Low  pollution”.  Notably,
                (r = 1). It is important  to note that TDS and EC are   the  Y1  groundwater  drinking  source  was  identified
                closely related and can often be used interchangeably. 16  as  experiencing  “Very  high  pollution”,  indicating  a
                  Variations in TDS as a function of HCO₃⁻, TA, K⁺,   significant and concerning level of nitrate contamination
                Mg²⁺, Ca²⁺, TH, SO₄²⁻, and the WQI exhibited strong   likely linked to anthropogenic  activities,  such as
                positive associations, with r values ranging from 0.720   fertilizer use and sewage intrusion. The WQI analysis
                to 0.976. The pH of the water samples showed a positive   revealed  that 50% of the groundwater sources are
                significant correlation only with Cr  (r = 0.801).  classified as “Excellent” quality for drinking, while 30%
                                               6+
                  Furthermore,   HCO₃⁻   demonstrated   significant   are rated as “Very good” and 20% as “Good” quality
                positive correlations with several parameters, including   for  human  consumption.  The  findings  of  this  study
                K⁺  (r  =  0.814),  Mg²⁺  (r = 0.652),  TH (r = 0.666),   provide valuable insights for policymakers and relevant
                EC  (r  =  0.720),  and  TDS  (r  =  0.720).  TA  showed  a   authorities,  supporting informed  decision-making  and
                perfect positive correlation with HCO₃⁻ levels (r = 1).   effective management strategies.
                TH displayed a strong positive correlation with



                Volume 22 Issue 1 (2025)                       111                           doi: 10.36922/AJWEP025040023
   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122