Page 73 - {PDF Title}
P. 73

Asian Journal of Water, Environment and Pollution. Vol. 22, No. 1 (2025), pp. 67-82.
                doi: 10.36922/ajwep.8163




                ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE

                     Water quality assessment and health risk evaluation
                     in Kushtia Municipality, Bangladesh: A comparative

                    analysis of untreated water, treated water, and public

                                                        water points




                         Md. Anik Hossain , Md. Inzamul Haque* , Md. Asikur Rahman ,
                                           Most. Atia Parvin , and Abul Bashar
                    Department of Geography and Environment, Faculty of Sciences, Islamic University, Kushtia, Khulna, Bangladesh
                                      *Corresponding author: Md. Inzamul Haque (mihaque@ge.iu.ac.bd)

                Received: December 24, 2024; Revised: February 18, 2025; Accepted: February 19, 2025; Published Online: March 11, 2025




                     Abstract: Pipeline water supply, a primary source in urban areas, delivers treated water from water treatment
                     plants (WTPs) directly to consumers. This study comprehensively evaluates water quality in Kushtia Municipality,
                     Bangladesh, focusing on untreated water, treated water, and freely available public water point (PWP) samples.
                     Twelve water samples were collected from March 1 to 7, 2024, and analyzed for physicochemical and microbiological
                     parameters  using  standard  methods. The  treatment  efficiency,  water  quality  index  (WQI),  Nemerow  pollution
                     index (NPI), and hazard quotient were calculated based on the analytical measurements. Findings indicate that,
                     among the 12 assessed parameters,  only three comply with Bangladesh’s water quality  standards.  The mean
                     cumulative efficiency shows that WTP 2 exhibits the highest treatment efficiency (30.76%), whereas WTP 1 has
                     the lowest (12.34%). While WQI scores classify all treated and PWP samples as “unfit” for consumption, treated
                     water demonstrates comparatively better quality than PWPs. The NPI analysis identifies the primary contributing
                     pollutants in the following order: Biochemical oxygen demand>hardness>alkalinity>iron>temperature>electrical
                     conductivity. The health risk assessment reveals no significant risk of iron ingestion or dermal exposure for adults
                     and children. However, long-term ingestion of arsenic-contaminated water presents a moderate health risk for both
                     groups, while dermal contact poses no risk.

                     Keywords:  Health  risk  assessment;  Kushtia  municipality;  Nemerow  pollution  index;  Physicochemical  and
                     microbiological parameters; Water quality index; Water treatment plants



                1. Introduction                                     indicators. However, the pollution of these parameters
                                                                    has become a global concern, driven by population
                Safe and clean water is essential for human health and   growth, agricultural and industrial activities, inadequate
                survival  and  is recognized  as a  fundamental  human   sewage management, and climate change. 3
                right.  Beyond sustaining life, water plays a critical role   Water  contamination,  poor  drinking  water  quality,
                     1
                in socioeconomic development.  Water quality is often   and  limited  access  expose  populations  to  disease-
                                            2
                classified  into  three  primary  categories:  biological,   causing  organisms, pathogens, and  hazardous  levels
                physical, and chemical, each characterized by distinct   of  toxic  substances  and  suspended  solids.  These
                                                                                                              4


                Volume 22 Issue 1 (2025)                        67                                 doi: 10.36922/ajwep.8163
   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78