Page 60 - AJWEP-v22i2
P. 60

Al-Tamimi, et al.

                444  m³/h  (10,660  m³/day).  This  flow  is  projected  to   often enriched with fossilized  fauna.  Thickness
                increase  to 15,200 m³/day  by 2027. In other parts of   ranges from 50 m to 130 m.
                the Wadi al-Samen Basin, cesspits are commonly used   4.  Upper Middle  Cenomanian  (Hebron Formation).
                for sanitation.  The  contents  of the  cesspits  are  often   This formation includes hard, massive dolomite or
                discharged indiscriminately  into the environment,      limestone, typical of the Hebron area. It is highly
                leading to potential contamination.                     karstic, with thickness ranging between 20 m and
                  The area lacks comprehensive geological studies,      120 m.
                which presents challenges in identifying geological   5.  Upper Cenomanian (Bethlehem Formation). Rich in
                features, comprehending tectonic processes, and         faunal content, this formation consists of limestone,
                defining  the  structural  framework  of  the  aquifer   dolomite,  and  chalky  limestone  with  marl,  with
                system.  According to Zaarir   and Al-Tamimi,  the      thickness ranging between 80 m and 270 m.
                                          36
                                                           37
                Hebron study area (Figure 2) is primarily composed of   6.  Upper  Cenomanian      (Turonian-Jerusalem
                sedimentary carbonate rocks dating from the Albian to   Formation). Comprising limestone  and dolomite,
                the Eocene periods, with quaternary alluvial deposits   this formation covers 36.4% of the study area,
                covering  much  of  the  surface.  The  primary  aquifers   ranking second in spatial  extent  within the study
                in Hebron and the surrounding area consist of the       basin. Its thickness ranges from 90 m to 130 m.
                following formations:                               7.  Senonian (Abu Dis Formation). This formation is
                1.  Aptian  to  Albian  (Kobar  Formation).  Found in   made up of chalks, chert, and marl, and it extends
                   northern Hebron, west of Halhoul town, this          across the southern part of the basin. The chalk is
                   formation primarily consists of limestone, marl, and   typically white, covering approximately 0.7% of the
                   marly  limestone,  with occasional  marl-limestone   basin, with thickness ranging from 0 m to 450 m.
                   intercalations. Thickness ranges from 30 m to 50 m.  8.  Quaternary (Modern Deposits). This layer consists
                2.  Albian (Lower Beit Khail Formation). Composed       of alluvial deposits and unconsolidated sediments,
                   of well-bedded, fine-crystalline, and highly karstic   such as clay, silt, gravel, and conglomerate, found
                   limestone, this formation also includes intermediate   on  the  valley  floors. Thickness  can  reach  tens  of
                   marl layers that increase  in thickness downward,    meters, and the red color of the alluvium is attributed
                   reaching depths between 120 m and 280 m.             to its limestone origin.
                3.  Lower  Middle  Cenomanian  (Yatta  Formation).
                   Consisting of fine- to medium-crystalline dolomite   2.2. Field sampling and laboratory methods
                   and limestone, this yellowish-brown formation    Groundwater samples were collected in September 2019
                   occasionally  includes  marly  limestone,  which  is   and May 2020 to represent both dry and wet seasons.































                                                    Figure 2. Geology of study area
                Note: A, A’ : Cross section from A(NW) to A’(SE). Abbreviations: F: Formation; NW: North West; SE: South East.

                Volume 22 Issue 2 (2025)                        54                           doi: 10.36922/AJWEP025040020
   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65