Page 226 - AJWEP-v22i3
P. 226

Švajlenka, et al.

                32.  Repaská G, Vilinová K, Šolcová L. Trends in development   44.  Gibb AG.  Off-Site  Fabrication:  Prefabrication,  Pre-
                   of residential areas in suburban zone of the city of Nitra   Assembly and Modularisation. Chichester:  John Wiley
                   (Slovakia). Eur Countryside. 2017;9(2):287-301.      and Sons; 1999.
                   doi: 10.1515/euco-2017-0018                      45.  Brandner R. Environmental impacts of wood
                33.  Dembski S, Sykes O, Couch C,  et  al. Reurbanisation   construction. Eur J Wood Prod. 2016;74:407-424.
                   and suburbia in Northwest Europe:  A comparative   46.  Pajchrowski  G,  Noskowiak  A,  Lewandowska  A,
                   perspective  on spatial trends and policy approaches.   Strykowski W. Wood as a building material in the light
                   Prog Plann. 2019;150:100462.                         of environmental  assessment  of full  life  cycle  of four
                   doi: 10.1016/j.progress.2019.100462                  buildings. Constr Build Mater. 2014;52:428-436.
                34.  Darko A, Chan AP. Critical analysis of green building      doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.11.066
                   research  trend  in construction  journals.  Habitat Int.   47.  Olsson A, Bolmsvik Å. Acoustics in Wooden Buildings-
                   2016;57:53-63.                                       State of the Art 2008. Sweden: SP Technical Research
                   doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2016.07.001                Institute of Sweden; 2008.
                35.  Semenyuk  O,  Abdrashitova  T, Beloussova E,  et  al.   48.  Rimshin  VI,  Labudin  BV,  Melekhov  VI,  Orlov  A,
                   The influence of ecology and economic factors on eco-  Kurbatov  VL.  Improvement  of  strength  and  stiffness
                   architecture and the design of energy efficient buildings.   of components of main struts with foundation in
                   World Trans Eng Technol Educ. 2018;16(2):186-192.    wooden frame  buildings.  ARPN J Eng  Appl Sci.
                36.  Zhou  Z,  Zhang  S,  Wang  C,  et  al. Achieving  energy   2018;13(11):3851-3856.
                   efficient buildings via retrofitting of existing buildings:   49.  Yao LH, Wang XM, Fei BH, Zhao RJ. Present Status
                   A case study. J Clean Prod. 2016;112:3605-3615.      of  Fireproofing  for  Wooden  Buildings.  Beijing:  China
                   doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.046                   Wood Industry; 2007. p. 5.
                37.  Hagbert P, Femenías P. Sustainable homes, or simply   50.  Riggio M, Dilmaghani M. Structural health monitoring
                   energy-efficient  buildings?  J  Hous Built  Environ.   of timber buildings: A literature survey. Build Res Inf.
                   2016;31(1):1-17.                                     2020;48(8):817-837.
                   doi: 10.1007/s10901-015-9440-y                       doi: 10.1080/09613218.2019.1681253
                38.  Martínez-Rocamora  A, Solís-Guzmán  J, Marrero  M.   51.  Mozolová M. A Survey of People‘s Opinions on Wooden
                   Ecological footprint of the use and maintenance phase   Buildings.  --. Zvolen:  Technical  University in Zvolen;
                   of buildings: Maintenance tasks and final results. Energy   2014.
                   Build. 2017;155:339-351.                         52.  Lindblad  F,  Gustavsson  Å.  A  comparison  between
                   doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.09.038                   architects‘  and residents‘ perceived  living  quality  in
                39.  Ximenes FA, Grant  T. Quantifying the greenhouse   wooden multifamily houses in Sweden.  For Prod J.
                   benefits  of  the  use  of  wood  products  in  two  popular   2020;70(4):462-468.
                   house designs in  Sydney,  Australia.  Int  J  Life  Cycle   53.  Ulu  M,  Durmuş  Arsan  Z.  State  of  the  Art  Survey
                   Assess. 2013;18(4):891-908.                          for  Energy-Efficient  Retrofit  of  Historic  Residential
                   doi: 10.1007/s11367-012-0533-5                       Buildings in Both the EU and Turkey. In: Proceedings of
                40.  Wang L, Toppinen A, Juslin H. Use of wood in green   the REHAB; 2017.
                   building: A study of expert perspectives from the UK. J   54.  Caniato M, Bettarello F, Ferluga A, Marsich L, Schmid C,
                   Clean Prod. 2014;65:350-361.                         Fausti P. Thermal and acoustic performance expectations
                   doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.08.023                   on timber buildings. Build Acoust. 2017;24(4):219-237.
                41.  Pei  S,  Van  de  Lindt  JW,  Popovski  M.  Approximate      doi: 10.1177/1351010X17740477
                   R-factor for cross-laminated timber walls in multistory   55.  Gardezi SSS, Shafiq N, Zawawi NAWA, Khamidi MF,
                   buildings. J Archit Eng. 2013;19(4):245-255.         Farhan SA. A multivariable regression tool for embodied
                   doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000117              carbon footprint prediction in housing habitat. Habitat
                42.  Gauvreau-Lemelin  C,  Attia  S.  Benchmarking  the   Int. 2016;53:292-300.
                   environmental impact of green and traditional masonry      doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.11.005
                   wall  constructions. In:  International  Conference  on   56.  Fastofski DC, González MAS, Kern AP. Sustainability
                   Passive Low Energy  Architecture Design to Thrive;   analysis of housing developments through the Brazilian
                   2017. p. 2856-2863.                                  environmental rating system Selo Casa Azul. Habitat Int.
                43.  Pittau  F,  Dotelli  G, Arrigoni A, Habert  G, Iannaccone   2017;67:44-53.
                   G. Massive  timber building  vs. conventional  masonry      doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2017.07.001
                   building:  A comparative  life cycle assessment of an   57.  Dadashpoor H, Ahani S. A conceptual typology of the
                   Italian  case  study.  IOP Conf  Ser Earth  Environ Sci.   spatial territories of the peripheral areas of metropolises.
                   2019;323(1):012016.                                  Habitat Int. 2019;90:102015.
                   doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/323/1/012016                  doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2019.102015





                Volume 22 Issue 3 (2025)                       220                           doi: 10.36922/AJWEP025080047
   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228