Page 27 - AN-2-1
P. 27
Advanced Neurology Outcomes of implant usage for depressed skull fractures
replacement of bone fragment in compound depressed skull Safety of autograft and allograft materials for cranioplasties,
fractures. Surg Neurol, 51: 452–457. a systematic review. World Neurosurg, 117: 443–452.e448.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0090-3019(98)00040-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.05.193
30. Yang M, Wu Z, Yu H, et al., 2021, Reconstruction for diverse 36. Beauchamp KM, Kashuk J, Moore EE, et al., 2010,
fronto-orbital defects with computer-assisted designed and Cranioplasty after postinjury decompressive craniectomy: Is
computer-assisted manufactured PEEK implants in one-stage timing of the essence? J Trauma, 69: 270–274.
operation: Case reports. Medicine (Baltimore), 100: e27452.
https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e3181e491c2
https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000027452
37. Neville IS, Amorim RL, Paiva WS, et al., 2014, Early surgery
31. Shah AM, Jung H, Skirboll S, 2014, Materials used in does not seem to be a pivotal criterion to improve prognosis
cranioplasty: A history and analysis. Neurosurg Focus, in patients with frontal depressed skull fractures. Biomed Res
36: E19. Int, 2014: 879286.
https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.2.FOCUS13561 https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/879286
32. Yu Q, Chen L, Qiu Z, et al., 2017, Skull repair materials 38. De Cola MC, Corallo F, Pria D, et al., 2018, Timing for
applied in cranioplasty: History and progress Transl Neurosci cranioplasty to improve neurological outcome: A systematic
Clin, 3: 48–57. review. Brain Behav, 8: e01106.
https://doi.org/10.18679/CN11-6030_R.2017.007 https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1106
33. Wolff A, Santiago GF, Belzberg M, et al., 2018, Adult 39. Klinger DR, Madden C, Beshay J, et al., 2014, Autologous
cranioplasty reconstruction with customized cranial and acrylic cranioplasty: A review of 10 years and 258 cases.
implants: Preferred technique, timing, and biomaterials. World Neurosurg, 82: e525–e530.
J Craniofac Surg, 29: 887–894.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2013.08.005
https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000004385
40. Zanotti B, Zingaretti N, Verlicchi A, et al., 2016, Cranioplasty:
34. Champlin R. Selection of autologous or allogeneic Review of materials. J Craniofac Surg, 27: 2061–2072.
transplantation. In: Kufe DW, Pollock RE, Weichselbaum
RR, et al., editors. Holland-Frei Cancer Medicine. 6 ed. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000003025
th
Hamilton, ON: BC Decker; 2003. Available from: https:// 41. Satardey RS, Balasubramaniam S, Pandya JS, et al., 2018,
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK12844 Analysis of factors influencing outcome of depressed
fracture of skull. Asian J Neurosurg, 13: 341–347.
35. van de Vijfeijken S, Munker T, Spijker R, et al., 2018,
Autologous bone is inferior to alloplastic cranioplasties: https://doi.org/10.4103/ajns.AJNS_117_16
Volume 2 Issue 1 (2023) 11 https://doi.org/10.36922/an.247

