Page 49 - AN-2-1
P. 49

Advanced Neurology                                                         Piribedil for Parkinson’s disease




            Table 3. Evidences for piribedil in the treatment of non‑motor symptoms of PD
             Study, year  Region  Trial design  Patients  Treatment    Primary      Main results      Evidence
                                                                       outcome                         levela
            Mentenopoulos  Greece  Open-label,   Stage II–IV PD   Piribedil   NA    Through 20-week     IV
            et al., 1989 [45]  single-cohort   patients (n = 30)  (200 mg/day)      treatment, tremor
                               clinical study            combined with              showed greatest change,
                                                         prior anti-PD drugs        and an improvement of
                                                                                    depression was observed
                                                                                    in 14 patients
            Rondot and   France  Open-label,   PD patients,   Piribedil   NA        The depression score   IV
            Ziegler, 1992 [40]  multicenter,   mainly I–II stages  monotherapy      was decreased from 10.2
                               single-cohort study (n = 113)  (150 – 250 mg/day)    to 7.3 (P < 0.001), and
                                                                                    moods were improved
                                                                                    obviously (28%, P < 0.01)
            Nagaraja and   Indian  Randomized,   Healthy elderly   Piribedil group    Change in MMSE  Through 3-month   II
            Jayashree,         double-blind,   patients with   (50 mg/day,   score  treatment, the cognition
            2001 [46]          placebo-controlled  mildly cognitive   n = 30); placebo   scores in the piribedil
                               clinical trial  impairment    group                  group were improved
                                            (n = 60)     (n = 30)                   more significantly (63.3%
                                                                                    vs. 26.7%, P < 0.01)
            Castro-Caldas   Multi-   Multicenter,   Stages I–III PD   Piribedil   Improvement of   A 12-month piribedil   I
            et al., 2006 [38]  national  randomized,   patients, poorly   (150 mg/day, n = 210)  the UPDRS III   treatment may
                               double-blind,   controlled by   or bromocriptine    score from baseline  significantly improve
                               controlled clinical   levodopa    (25 mg/day,    over 12 months,   cognitive function in PD
                               trial        (n = 425);   n = 215) combined  expressed as the   patients
                                            subgroup analysis  with levodopa  change from
                                            on cognitive               baseline to the last
                                            function (n = 178)         observed value,
                                                                       and second as
                                                                       the response rate
                                                                       defined by a 30% or
                                                                       more decrease on
                                                                       the UPDRS III score
                                                                       at the last value
            Yan-Bo et al.,   China  Prospective cohort  Patients with early  Piribedil   NA  UPDRS scores,   III
            2007 [72]          study        PD (n = 67)  monotherapy                depression, sleep quality
                                                         group (n = 25,             and quality of life in the
                                                         50 – 100 mg/day);          combination group were
                                                         piribedil adjunct          improved significantly
                                                         to compound                at each follow-up time
                                                         levodopa (n = 20);         point; the depression
                                                         and compound               scores in the piribedil
                                                         levodopa                   group were decreased
                                                         monotherapy                from baseline in any
                                                         (n = 22)                   observation window
            Thobois et al.,   France  Randomized,   Patients with   Piribedil group   The improvement  After 12 weeks, the apathy   II
            2013 [47]          double-blind,   mid-stage and   (maximum dose   of apathy under   scores in the piribedil
                               placebo-controlled  advanced PD   300 mg/day,    treatment, as   group were decreased
                               clinical trial  presenting with   n = 19); placebo   assessed by the   more significantly (34.6%
                                            apathy after deep   group (n = 18)  reduction of the   vs. 3.2%, P = 0.015),
                                            brain subthalamic          Starkstein Apathy  and apathy symptom
                                            nucleus                    Scale score, in   was also improved more
                                            stimulation                both treatment   (improved by 46.6% vs.
                                            (n = 37)                   groups       worsened by 2.3%,
                                                                                    P = 0.005). Piribedil
                                                                                    also has a tendency to
                                                                                    improve quality of life and
                                                                                    anhedonia
                                                                                                       (Cont’d...)



            Volume 2 Issue 1 (2023)                         7                          https://doi.org/10.36922/an.290
   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54