Page 92 - AN-3-3
P. 92

Advanced Neurology                                               Rescue stenting in mechanical thrombectomy



            non-RS group (9.7% vs. 14.1%; P = 0.04).  Premat et al.   associated with increased rates of good procedural and
                                              120
            included 352  patients and found no difference in sICH   functional outcomes without increased risk of hemorrhage.
            rates (OR 0.68 [0.37 – 1.27]; P = 0.23). 121       While further trials are warranted to establish the optimal
              Several studies have demonstrated an increased risk   rescue strategies and devices, the current evidence may
            of IST, stent migration, and subsequent reocclusion in   support RS as an alternative intervention in managing
            stent-retriever thrombectomy in ICAS-related LVO. 52,122,123    refractory acute LVOs.
            Appropriate selection, sizing, deployment of the stent,   Acknowledgments
            and use of a proper long-term antithrombotic therapy are
            important to avoid RS-related complications.       None.

            5. The role of interdisciplinarity in              Funding
            neurological emergencies                           None.

            The interplay between neuro-interventionalists and   Conflict of interest
            neurologists represents a cornerstone of effective
            management strategies for neurological emergencies.   Thanh N. Nguyen is an Associate Editor of Stroke: Advisory
            Assessment of risks and benefits of interventional procedures   Board for Brainomix, Aruna Bio, but has no known
            should have an interdisciplinary approach with neuro-  competing financial interests or personal relationships
            interventionalists weighing in potential complications   that could have influenced the work reported in this paper.
            and technical  challenges,  whereas neurologists, on  the   Separately, other authors declared that they have no known
            other hand, bring a comprehensive understanding of   competing interests.
            the  patient’s  medical history,  comorbidities,  and  the
            pathophysiology of neurological disorders. By combining   Author contributions
            these complementary perspectives, the interdisciplinary   Conceptualization: Noor A. Mahmoud, Thanh N. Nguyen
            team can make informed decisions tailoring treatment   Methodology: Noor A. Mahmoud, Mohamad Abdalkader,
            plans to each patient’s unique circumstances.         Piers Klein, Thanh N. Nguyen

            6. Future research                                 Writing–original draft: Noor A. Mahmoud, Mohamad
                                                                  Abdalkader, Piers Klein, Thanh N. Nguyen
            Despite advancements in our understanding of RS,   Writing–review & editing: Noor A. Mahmoud, Sami Al
            challenges and limitations remain. First, optimal patient   Kasab, Adam de Havenon, Xu Tong, Baixue Jia, Marios
            selection for RS is unclear. The current evidence on patient   Psychogios, Urs Fischer, Zhongrong Miao, Thanh N.
            selection is mainly derived from studies, and generalizing   Nguyen
            these findings to clinical practice may be difficult. Caution
            should be used, particularly in cases where the procedure’s   Ethics approval and consent to participate
            potential benefits may be uncertain or when patient or   Not applicable.
            procedural factors place the patient at increased risk.
            Second, device options are limited with only a single FDA-  Consent for publication
            approved device for intracranial stenting and off-label use
            of coronary stents in intracranial pathology. Third, it is   Not applicable.
            unclear how many passes of MT should be attempted before   Availability of data
            attempting  RS. It is  also  unclear which  rescue  technique
            is optimal between RS, balloon angioplasty, and adjunct   Not applicable.
            pharmacological therapy. Finally, no randomized trials have   References
            clearly demonstrated the benefit of RS compared to standard
            thrombectomy care in patients with refractory occlusion or   1.   Feigin VL, Owolabi MO, World Stroke Organization-Lancet
            ICAS-LVO. Prospective studies and randomized controlled   Neurology Commission Stroke Collaboration G. Pragmatic
            trials to address RS and angioplasty are ongoing (ANGEL-  solutions to reduce the global burden of stroke: A  world
            REBOOT, RESCUE ICAS, ICARUS, and PISTAR). 66,124,125  stroke organization-lancet neurology commission.  Lancet
                                                                  Neurol. 2023;22:1160-1206.
            7. Conclusion                                         doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(23)00277-6

            RS is considered a rescue therapy when initial MT attempts   2.   Saver JL, Goyal M, Bonafe A,  et al. Stent-retriever
            fail to achieve successful recanalization. RS appears to be   thrombectomy after intravenous t-PA vs. t-PA alone in


            Volume 3 Issue 3 (2024)                         7                                doi: 10.36922/an.3950
   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97