Page 94 - AN-3-3
P. 94

Advanced Neurology                                               Rescue stenting in mechanical thrombectomy



               good outcome following endovascular therapy. AJNR Am J   reporting standards for intra-arterial cerebral thrombolysis
               Neuroradiol. 2017;38:90-96.                        for acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2003;34:e109-e137.
               doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4968                            doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000082721.62796.09
            24.  Guo S, Jin T, Xu C, Huang W, Shi Z, Geng Y. Rescue stenting   34.  Zaidat OO, Yoo AJ, Khatri P,  et al. Recommendations
               after the failure of mechanical thrombectomy to treat   on angiographic revascularization grading standards for
               acute intracranial atherosclerotic occlusion.  Front Neurol.   acute  ischemic  stroke:  A  consensus  statement.  Stroke.
               2022;13:1001496.                                   2013;44:2650-2663.
               doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.1001496                    doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001972
            25.  Sajja KC, Huded V, Prajapati C, et al. Rescue stenting for   35.  Gerber JC, Miaux YJ, Von Kummer R. Scoring flow
               refractory large vessel occlusions in the thrombectomy Era:   restoration in cerebral angiograms after endovascular
               Intracranial  use  of  coronary  stents  in  low-mid  economic   revascularization in acute ischemic stroke patients.
               settings. Cureus. 2022;14:e23847.                  Neuroradiology. 2015;57:227-240.
               doi: 10.7759/cureus.23847                          doi: 10.1007/s00234-014-1460-x
            26.  Luo G, Gao F, Zhang X, et al. Intracranial stenting as rescue   36.  Almekhlafi MA, Mishra S, Desai JA, et al. Not all “successful”
               therapy after failure of mechanical thrombectomy for basilar   angiographic reperfusion patients are an equal validation
               artery occlusion: Data from the aNGEL-ACT registry. Front   of a modified TICI scoring system.  Interv Neuroradiol.
               Neurol. 2021;12:739213.                            2014;20:21-27.
               doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.739213                     doi: 10.15274/INR-2014-10004
            27.  Huo X, Sun D, Chen W, Han H, et al. Endovascular treatment   37.  LeCouffe NE, Kappelhof M, Treurniet KM, et al. 2B, 2C, or 3:
               for acute large vessel occlusion due to underlying intracranial   What  should  be  the  angiographic  target  for  endovascular
               atherosclerotic disease. Semin Neurol. 2023;43:337-344.  treatment in ischemic stroke? Stroke. 2020;51:1790-1796.
               doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1771207                        doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.028891
            28.  Mohammaden MH, Haussen DC, Al-Bayati AR,  et al.   38.  Goyal M, Fargen KM, Turk AS, et al. 2C or not 2C: Defining
               Stenting and angioplasty in neurothrombectomy: Matched   an improved revascularization grading scale and the need
               analysis of rescue intracranial stenting versus failed   for standardization of angiography outcomes in stroke trials.
               thrombectomy. Stroke. 2022;53:2779-2788.           J Neurointerv Surg. 2014;6:83-86.
               doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.038248                  doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-010665
            29.  Abdalla RN, Cantrell DR, Shaibani A,  et al. Refractory   39.  Liebeskind DS, Bracard S, Guillemin F,  et al. eTICI
               stroke thrombectomy: Prevalence, etiology, and adjunctive   reperfusion: Defining success in endovascular stroke
               treatment in a North American Cohort.  AJNR Am  J   therapy. J Neurointerv Surg. 2019;11:433-438.
               Neuroradiol. 2021;42:1258-1263.
                                                                  doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014127
               doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A7124
                                                               40.  Sun D, Nguyen TN, Pan Y, et al. Unsuccessful recanalization
            30.  De Havenon A, Zaidat OO, Amin-Hanjani S, et al. Large   versus medical management of patients with large ischemic
               vessel occlusion stroke due to intracranial atherosclerotic   core: Analysis of the ANGEL-ASPECT randomized trial.
               disease: Identification, medical and interventional   Clin Neuroradiol. 2024;34:441-450.
               treatment, and outcomes. Stroke. 2023;54:1695-1705.
                                                                  doi: 10.1007/s00062-024-01384-5
               doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.122.040008
                                                               41.  Marei O, Podlasek A, Soo E,  et al. Safety and efficacy of
            31.  Labeyrie MA, Civelli V, Reiner P,  et al. Prevalence and   adjunctive  intra-arterial antithrombotic therapy during
               treatment of spontaneous intracranial artery dissections in   endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke:
               patients with acute stroke due to intracranial large vessel   A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurointerv Surg.
               occlusion. J Neurointerv Surg. 2018;10:761-764.    2024.
               doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-013763               doi: 10.1136/jnis-2023-021244
            32.  Al Kasab S, Nguyen TN, Derdeyn CP, et al. Emergent large   42.  Qureshi  AI,  Lodhi  A, Akhtar  IN,  et al.  Mechanical
               vessel occlusion due to intracranial stenosis: Identification,   thrombectomy with intra-arterial thrombolysis versus
               management, challenges, and future directions.  Stroke.   mechanical thrombectomy alone in patients with acute
               2024;55:355-365.                                   ischemic stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int
               doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.123.043635                  J Stroke. 2024;19:16-28.
            33.  Higashida RT, Furlan AJ, Roberts H, et al. Trial design and      doi: 10.1177/17474930231184369


            Volume 3 Issue 3 (2024)                         9                                doi: 10.36922/an.3950
   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99