Page 105 - AN-4-2
P. 105

Advanced Neurology                                                   PVT in Indonesian neurological patients



            48.  Critchfield E, Soble JR, Marceaux JC,  et  al. Cognitive      doi: 10.1080/13854046.2019.1585574
               impairment does not cause invalid performance: Analyzing   57.  Van der Werf SP, Prins JB, Jongen PJH, Van der Meer JWM,
               performance patterns among cognitively unimpaired,   Bleijenberg G. Abnormal neuropsychological findings are
               impaired, and noncredible participants across six performance   not necessarily a sign of cerebral impairment: A matched
               validity tests. Clin Neuropsychol. 2019;33(6):1083-1101.
                                                                  comparison between chronic fatigue syndrome and multiple
               doi: 10.1080/13854046.2018.1508615                 sclerosis.  Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychol Behav Neurol.
                                                                  2000;13(3):199-203.
            49.  Bodner T, Merten T, Benke T. Performance validity measures
               in clinical patients with aphasia. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol.   58.  Rensen YCM, Vos SH, Aaftink IM, Kessels RPC. Performance
               2019;41(5):476-483.                                validity testing in individuals with alcohol-related cognitive
                                                                  impairments. Psychol Neurosci. 2024;17(2):131-141.
               doi: 10.1080/13803395.2019.1579783
                                                                  doi: 10.1037/pne0000335
            50.  Merten  T,  Bossink  L, Schmand B.  On  the  limits  of  effort
               testing: Symptom validity tests and severity of neurocognitive   59.  Martín-Aragoneses MT, Mejuto G, del Río D, Fernandes SM,
               symptoms in nonlitigant patients. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol.   Rodrigues PFS, López-Higes R. Task demands and sentence
               2007;29(3):308-318.                                reading comprehension among healthy older adults: The
                                                                  complementary roles of cognitive reserve and working
               doi: 10.1080/13803390600693607
                                                                  memory. Brain Sci. 2023;13(3):428.
            51.  Kiewel  NA, Wisdom NM, Bradshaw  MR, Pastorek NJ,
               Strutt  AM. A  retrospective review of Digit span-related      doi: 10.3390/brainsci13030428
               effort  indicators  in probable  Alzheimer’s disease patients.   60.  Tyson BT, Baker S, Greenacre M,  et al. Differentiating
               Clin Neuropsychol. 2012;26(6):965-974.             epilepsy from psychogenic nonepileptic seizures using
                                                                  neuropsychological test data. Epilepsy Behav. 2018;87:39-45.
               doi: 10.1080/13854046.2012.694478
                                                                  doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2018.08.010
            52.  Zenisek R, Millis SR, Banks SJ, Miller JB. Prevalence of below-
               criterion Reliable Digit Span scores in a clinical sample of   61.  Nelson NW, Boone K, Dueck A, Wagener L, Lu P, Grills C.
               older adults. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2016;31(5):426-433.  Relationships between eight measures of suspect effort. Clin
                                                                  Neuropsychol. 2003;17(2):263-272.
               doi: 10.1093/arclin/acw025
                                                                  doi: 10.1076/clin.17.2.263.16511
            53.  Kanser RJ, Rapport LJ, Hanks RA, Patrick SD. Utility of
               WAIS-IV Digit Span indices as measures of performance   62.  Priherdityo   E.   Indonesia  “Lupa”  Catat  Jumlah
               validity in moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. Clin   Penderita Demensia. CNN Indonesia; 2016. Available
               Neuropsychol. 2022;36(7):1950-1963.                from:           https://www.cnnindonesia.com/gaya-
                                                                  hidup/20160924070505-255-160792/indonesia-lupa-catat-
               doi: 10.1080/13854046.2021.1921277
                                                                  jumlah-penderita-demensia [Last accessed on 2023 Jul 20].
            54.  Webber TA, Soble JR. Utility of various WAIS-IV Digit Span
               indices for identifying noncredible performance validity   63.  Nieuwenhuis-Mark RE. The death knoll for the MMSE:
               among cognitively impaired and unimpaired examinees.   Has it outlived its purpose?  J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol.
               Clin Neuropsychol. 2018;32(4):657-670.             2010;23(3):151-157.
                                                                  doi: 10.1177/0891988710363714
               doi: 10.1080/13854046.2017.1415374
                                                               64.  McGuire C, Crawford S, Evans JJ. Effort testing in dementia
            55.  Maiman M, Del Bene VA, MacAllister WS, et al. Reliable
               digit span: Does it adequately measure suboptimal effort   assessment: A  systematic review.  Arch Clin Neuropsychol.
               in an adult epilepsy population?  Arch Clin Neuropsychol.   2019;34:114-131.
               2018;34(2):259-267.                                doi: 10.1093/arclin/acy012
               doi: 10.1093/arclin/acy027                      65.  Dunning DL, Westgate B, Adlam ALR. A meta-analysis of
                                                                  working  memory  impairments in  survivors  of moderate-
            56.  Ruchinskas R. Wechsler adult intelligence scale-4  edition digit
                                                 th
               span performance in subjective cognitive complaints, amnestic   to-severe  traumatic  brain  injury.  Neuropsychology.  2016;
               mild cognitive impairment, and probable dementia of the   30(7):811-819.
               Alzheimer type. Clin Neuropsychol. 2019;33(8):1436-1444.     doi: 10.1037/neu0000285












            Volume 4 Issue 2 (2025)                         99                               doi: 10.36922/an.5661
   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110