Page 53 - AN-4-2
P. 53

Advanced Neurology                                                     George Cotzias and L-DOPA therapy



            of L-DOPA. 28,39,78  It is suggested that the presence of resting   The efficacy of apomorphine as a treatment was closely
            tremor may be associated with secondary compensatory   linked to the patient’s response to L-DOPA; only if the
            mechanisms that could mitigate LID, even with L-DOPA   health condition of the patient was getting better by the
            treatment. 76,79  In some cases, LID occurs as a progression   use of L-DOPA, there would be amelioration by the use
            following other motor fluctuations. 13             of apomorphine.  In addition, N-propylnoraporphine
                                                                             80
              Moreover, lower-than-expected rates of LID were   was shown to minimize certain L-DOPA-related adverse
            observed when low daily doses of carbidopa/L-DOPA   effects, though it was ineffective in reducing dyskinesias
                                                                                                    7
            were administered.  The pathophysiology of L-DOPA-  when their underlying cause was not L-DOPA.
                            39
            associated  response  fluctuations  is  complex  and  not  yet   Moreover, the suspicion that carbidopa might be
                          28
            fully understood.  Indeed, it is understood that choosing   effective in the treatment of chorea led Cotzias to pioneer
            L-DOPA  as  a  first-line  therapy  results  in  significant   the  revolutionary carbidopa/L-DOPA  combination,  also
            functional improvements for patients, particularly in terms   known as the peripheral amino acid decarboxylase inhibitor
            of symptomatic relief, during the early years following the   (DDI) medication. 1,3,7,19,32  This therapy is primarily used in
                                                                                 25
                                                                                                     st
            onset of PD.  During the final years of his life, Cotzias   the early stages of PD.  Cotzias tried for the 1  time the
                      28
            provided significant data on the relationship between   synthesis of this drug in 1968 by adding carbidopa to the
            cancer  and the features of L-DOPA. 7              already administered L-DOPA. 3,7
                 7
            7. Development of new drugs by Cotzias               The  benefits  of this medicine  were reduced doses of
                                                               L-DOPA, 1,5,8,23,28,32,36,48  faster efficacy of L-DOPA, and milder
            Although the adverse effects of L-DOPA therapy were   harms caused by the latter. 28,32,33,40,48,60  In 1972, Cotzias
            significant, they could neither win over the exceptional   published the study of DDI in a scientific article.  The
                                                                                                        7,48
            potency of the therapy nor deter Cotzias from using   therapy’s results were so extraordinary that the first oral
            L-DOPA  to  treat  his  patients.   On  the  contrary,  the   form of the DDI, marketed under the trademark Sinemet,
                                      3,7
            side  effects  of  L-DOPA  became  a  strong motivation  for   was released in 1973. 3,5,32
            Cotzias to create new medications combining L-DOPA   Since then, various research studies have confirmed
            with various adjuncts like dopamine agonists – substitute   the valuable impact of the new formula on Parkinsonian
            compounds capable of crossing the blood–brain barrier   patients. 5,17,23,36  Carbidopa/L-DOPA increases the level
            without being converted by local enzymes. 3,36,38  The new   of L-DOPA in the brain from 1% in carbidopa’s absence
            drugs led to a reduction in the required L-DOPA dose and   to 10%  in carbidopa’s presence. L-DOPA/carbidopa is
                                                                                          23
            minimized irregularities associated with its use. 3
                                                               considered the most efficient symptomatic treatment for
              Cotzias recommended the use of apomorphine,      PD, the easiest drug to source, the most affording drug
            the dopamine agonist that could pass the blood–brain   and can be easily monitored.  To address the issue of
                                                                                        39
            barrier without being converted by local enzymes. When   gastrointestinal problems, in the 1990s, the compound
            selected as a treatment option, apomorphine stimulated   was released in Sweden as an intestinal gel. 5,10,19  This
            all dopaminergic receptors, exhibited antidyskinetic   formulation has since become a cost-effective therapy
            evidence, and demonstrated an efficacy nearly equal to that   not only for gastroenterological disorders but also for
            of L-DOPA in improving PD symptoms. 7,32,38        patients with acute abnormalities.  The gel formulation
                                                                                           20
              Apomorphine  was  a  reliable  substance  to  assess  the   maintains nearly stable plasma concentrations of L-DOPA,
                                                                                         28
            dopaminergic receptor responsiveness and the presence of   contributing to its effectiveness.  It is commercialized in
                                                                                              ™28
            dyskinesia.  It cured various stages of PD before functional   Europe under the trade name Duodopa  and is considered
                    7,80
            neurosurgery and was used as a treatment for patients   safer and better tolerated compared to the immediate-
                                                                                             24
            who became disabled following deep cerebral stimulation   release form of carbidopa/L-DOPA.  In 2006, an oral
            or pallidotomy. 7,32,80  Later, the use of apomorphine   solution of carbidopa/L-DOPA was commercialized in the
                                                                   17
            was permitted in European countries and Canada.    USA.  In addition, a skin patch of carbidopa was developed
                                                         80
            Furthermore, it was estimated to be a successful drug for   for patients with metabolism dysfunction, overcoming
            patients resistant to other therapies experiencing motor   the skin barriers and improving the drug’s duration and
                                                                          2,5,8,32
            distortions during the last stages of PD. 3,7,80  At present, a   concentration.
            sublingual form of apomorphine is available.  Moreover,   At present, carbidopa/L-DOPA is defined as the most
                                                64
            apomorphine can serve as a temporary perioperative   impactful oral medicine in PD.  It is the most prescribed
                                                                                        81
            treatment during abdominal surgery for patients with PD.    treatment as it improves PD symptoms, especially at the
                                                         80
            An important parameter to assess the efficacy of dopamine   early stages of PD. It offers mild and infrequent side effects,
                                                                             23
            agonists was the patient’s reaction to L-DOPA. 80  including dyskinesia, as well as a positive influence on the
            Volume 4 Issue 2 (2025)                         47                               doi: 10.36922/an.5177
   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58